COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Santini, Elio José
Publication Date: 2000
Other Authors: Haselein, Clóvis Roberto, Gatto, Darci Alberto
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Ciência Florestal (Online)
DOI: 10.5902/19805098397
Download full: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/397
Summary: Woods from plantation stands of parana, slash and loblolly pines, thinned at least once, were tested with the objective of comparing physical and mechanical properties. Five threes from each specie were harvested from selected stands. The stems were bucked into logs and then transported to the sawmill cooperating in this study. The logs were processed into planks, which were air seasoned, and then cut into pieces according to ASTM standards. Although the average strength of parana pine was slightly larger than the two other pines, significant differences were found only in the tests of static bending (modulus of elasticity and tension at the proportional limit), compression parallel to the grain (maximum crushing strength, modulus of elasticity and tension at the proportional limit) and hardness (cross-section). The  properties  were  not  different  for  slash  and loblolly pines, except in tension perpendicular to the grain, where the strength of loblolly pine was higher than the others. No differences were found for specific gravity and shrinkage among the species.
id UFSM-6_72c069d515a2da17a60cd69f484a5d17
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/397
network_acronym_str UFSM-6
network_name_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
spelling COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODSAnálise comparativa das propriedades físicas e mecânicas da madeira de três coníferas de florestas plantadas.Wood propertiesparana pineslash pineloblolly pine.PropriedadesaraucáriaPinus elliottiiPinus taeda.Woods from plantation stands of parana, slash and loblolly pines, thinned at least once, were tested with the objective of comparing physical and mechanical properties. Five threes from each specie were harvested from selected stands. The stems were bucked into logs and then transported to the sawmill cooperating in this study. The logs were processed into planks, which were air seasoned, and then cut into pieces according to ASTM standards. Although the average strength of parana pine was slightly larger than the two other pines, significant differences were found only in the tests of static bending (modulus of elasticity and tension at the proportional limit), compression parallel to the grain (maximum crushing strength, modulus of elasticity and tension at the proportional limit) and hardness (cross-section). The  properties  were  not  different  for  slash  and loblolly pines, except in tension perpendicular to the grain, where the strength of loblolly pine was higher than the others. No differences were found for specific gravity and shrinkage among the species. Madeiras provenientes de florestas plantadas de Araucaria angustifolia, Pinus elliottii e Pinus taeda submetidas a, pelo menos, um desbaste, foram testadas com o objetivo de comparar suas propriedades físicas e mecânicas. Cinco árvores de cada espécie, obtidas de talhões, previamente, selecionados, foram coletadas, transformadas em toretes e pranchões para posterior confecção, condicionamento e ensaio dos corpos de prova segundo as recomendações da norma ASTM. Embora a resistência média da Araucaria tenha sido ligeiramente superior às duas espécies de Pinus, diferenças significativas foram encontradas apenas nos testes de flexão estática (módulo de elasticidade e tensão no limite proporcional), compressão axial (tensão no limite proporcional, módulo de ruptura e de elasticidade) e dureza axial. Entre as espécies de Pinus, não foram dectadas diferenças nas propriedades, exceto em tração normal às fibras em que a resistência da madeira de P. taeda foi maior que as demais. Com relação à massa específica básica e coeficiente de contração, nenhuma diferença significante foi observada entre as espécies estudadas.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2000-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/39710.5902/19805098397Ciência Florestal; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2000); 85-93Ciência Florestal; v. 10 n. 1 (2000); 85-931980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/397/269Santini, Elio JoséHaselein, Clóvis RobertoGatto, Darci Albertoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-06-07T18:14:25Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/397Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2017-06-07T18:14:25Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
Análise comparativa das propriedades físicas e mecânicas da madeira de três coníferas de florestas plantadas.
title COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
spellingShingle COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
Santini, Elio José
Wood properties
parana pine
slash pine
loblolly pine.
Propriedades
araucária
Pinus elliottii
Pinus taeda.
Santini, Elio José
Wood properties
parana pine
slash pine
loblolly pine.
Propriedades
araucária
Pinus elliottii
Pinus taeda.
title_short COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
title_full COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
title_fullStr COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
title_full_unstemmed COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
title_sort COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
author Santini, Elio José
author_facet Santini, Elio José
Santini, Elio José
Haselein, Clóvis Roberto
Gatto, Darci Alberto
Haselein, Clóvis Roberto
Gatto, Darci Alberto
author_role author
author2 Haselein, Clóvis Roberto
Gatto, Darci Alberto
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santini, Elio José
Haselein, Clóvis Roberto
Gatto, Darci Alberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Wood properties
parana pine
slash pine
loblolly pine.
Propriedades
araucária
Pinus elliottii
Pinus taeda.
topic Wood properties
parana pine
slash pine
loblolly pine.
Propriedades
araucária
Pinus elliottii
Pinus taeda.
description Woods from plantation stands of parana, slash and loblolly pines, thinned at least once, were tested with the objective of comparing physical and mechanical properties. Five threes from each specie were harvested from selected stands. The stems were bucked into logs and then transported to the sawmill cooperating in this study. The logs were processed into planks, which were air seasoned, and then cut into pieces according to ASTM standards. Although the average strength of parana pine was slightly larger than the two other pines, significant differences were found only in the tests of static bending (modulus of elasticity and tension at the proportional limit), compression parallel to the grain (maximum crushing strength, modulus of elasticity and tension at the proportional limit) and hardness (cross-section). The  properties  were  not  different  for  slash  and loblolly pines, except in tension perpendicular to the grain, where the strength of loblolly pine was higher than the others. No differences were found for specific gravity and shrinkage among the species.
publishDate 2000
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2000-03-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/397
10.5902/19805098397
url https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/397
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/19805098397
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/397/269
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2000); 85-93
Ciência Florestal; v. 10 n. 1 (2000); 85-93
1980-5098
0103-9954
reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
collection Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br
_version_ 1822181488045588480
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.5902/19805098397