Low amplitude and high frequency mechanical stimulation does not affect directly cell differentiation during bone healing

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Torres, Libardo Andrés González
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: Alonso, Stephany de Camilo e, Meireles, Agnes Batista
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Revista Ciência e Natura (Online)
Download full: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaenatura/article/view/30167
Summary: Bone fractures has high incidence and despite its relevance and frequency, some bone healing process features are still unknown. In this work, it is computationally investigated the influence of low amplitude and high frequency mechanical stimulation on cell differentiation during bone healing, using a cell differentiation theory that relates two mechanical variables (strain and flow velocity of interstitial fluid) with the cell fate. For this purpose, a finite element model was developed to study three hypothetical situations, to determine in which proportion external stimulation influences bone healing. Firstly, the mechanical stimulus was computed as 20% of external mechanical stimulus and 80% of the stimulus during gait. Secondly, it was considered 50% external mechanical stimulus and 50% gait stimulus. Finally, it was considered a proportion of 80% external mechanical stimulus and 20% gait stimulus. The results indicated that hypothesis considering high proportions of external stimulation results in unreal delayed healing process and the first hypothetical situation proved to be that which best represents the real process. From the results obtained, it was concluded that external mechanical stimulation does not affected directly cell differentiation during bone healing. Thus, other processes such as flow of oxygen, nutrients or wastes must be considered.
id UFSM-23_7876f2a17cd0fa9a9ea9c0cd52d9c4c9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30167
network_acronym_str UFSM-23
network_name_str Revista Ciência e Natura (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Low amplitude and high frequency mechanical stimulation does not affect directly cell differentiation during bone healingMechanical StimuluBone HealingFinite Element MethodBone fractures has high incidence and despite its relevance and frequency, some bone healing process features are still unknown. In this work, it is computationally investigated the influence of low amplitude and high frequency mechanical stimulation on cell differentiation during bone healing, using a cell differentiation theory that relates two mechanical variables (strain and flow velocity of interstitial fluid) with the cell fate. For this purpose, a finite element model was developed to study three hypothetical situations, to determine in which proportion external stimulation influences bone healing. Firstly, the mechanical stimulus was computed as 20% of external mechanical stimulus and 80% of the stimulus during gait. Secondly, it was considered 50% external mechanical stimulus and 50% gait stimulus. Finally, it was considered a proportion of 80% external mechanical stimulus and 20% gait stimulus. The results indicated that hypothesis considering high proportions of external stimulation results in unreal delayed healing process and the first hypothetical situation proved to be that which best represents the real process. From the results obtained, it was concluded that external mechanical stimulation does not affected directly cell differentiation during bone healing. Thus, other processes such as flow of oxygen, nutrients or wastes must be considered.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2018-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaenatura/article/view/3016710.5902/2179460X30167Ciência e Natura; CIÊNCIA E NATURA, V. 40, 2018; e56Ciência e Natura; CIÊNCIA E NATURA, V. 40, 2018; e562179-460X0100-8307reponame:Revista Ciência e Natura (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMenghttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaenatura/article/view/30167/19644Copyright (c) 2018 Ciência e Naturainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTorres, Libardo Andrés GonzálezAlonso, Stephany de Camilo eMeireles, Agnes Batista2020-04-23T17:42:33Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30167Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaenatura/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaenatura/oaicienciaenatura@ufsm.br || centraldeperiodicos@ufsm.br2179-460X0100-8307opendoar:2020-04-23T17:42:33Revista Ciência e Natura (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Low amplitude and high frequency mechanical stimulation does not affect directly cell differentiation during bone healing
title Low amplitude and high frequency mechanical stimulation does not affect directly cell differentiation during bone healing
spellingShingle Low amplitude and high frequency mechanical stimulation does not affect directly cell differentiation during bone healing
Torres, Libardo Andrés González
Mechanical Stimulu
Bone Healing
Finite Element Method
title_short Low amplitude and high frequency mechanical stimulation does not affect directly cell differentiation during bone healing
title_full Low amplitude and high frequency mechanical stimulation does not affect directly cell differentiation during bone healing
title_fullStr Low amplitude and high frequency mechanical stimulation does not affect directly cell differentiation during bone healing
title_full_unstemmed Low amplitude and high frequency mechanical stimulation does not affect directly cell differentiation during bone healing
title_sort Low amplitude and high frequency mechanical stimulation does not affect directly cell differentiation during bone healing
author Torres, Libardo Andrés González
author_facet Torres, Libardo Andrés González
Alonso, Stephany de Camilo e
Meireles, Agnes Batista
author_role author
author2 Alonso, Stephany de Camilo e
Meireles, Agnes Batista
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Torres, Libardo Andrés González
Alonso, Stephany de Camilo e
Meireles, Agnes Batista
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mechanical Stimulu
Bone Healing
Finite Element Method
topic Mechanical Stimulu
Bone Healing
Finite Element Method
description Bone fractures has high incidence and despite its relevance and frequency, some bone healing process features are still unknown. In this work, it is computationally investigated the influence of low amplitude and high frequency mechanical stimulation on cell differentiation during bone healing, using a cell differentiation theory that relates two mechanical variables (strain and flow velocity of interstitial fluid) with the cell fate. For this purpose, a finite element model was developed to study three hypothetical situations, to determine in which proportion external stimulation influences bone healing. Firstly, the mechanical stimulus was computed as 20% of external mechanical stimulus and 80% of the stimulus during gait. Secondly, it was considered 50% external mechanical stimulus and 50% gait stimulus. Finally, it was considered a proportion of 80% external mechanical stimulus and 20% gait stimulus. The results indicated that hypothesis considering high proportions of external stimulation results in unreal delayed healing process and the first hypothetical situation proved to be that which best represents the real process. From the results obtained, it was concluded that external mechanical stimulation does not affected directly cell differentiation during bone healing. Thus, other processes such as flow of oxygen, nutrients or wastes must be considered.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaenatura/article/view/30167
10.5902/2179460X30167
url https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaenatura/article/view/30167
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/2179460X30167
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaenatura/article/view/30167/19644
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Ciência e Natura
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Ciência e Natura
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência e Natura; CIÊNCIA E NATURA, V. 40, 2018; e56
Ciência e Natura; CIÊNCIA E NATURA, V. 40, 2018; e56
2179-460X
0100-8307
reponame:Revista Ciência e Natura (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Revista Ciência e Natura (Online)
collection Revista Ciência e Natura (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Ciência e Natura (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cienciaenatura@ufsm.br || centraldeperiodicos@ufsm.br
_version_ 1839277883528314880