Using probiotics to improve nutrient digestibility and gut-health of weaned pigs : a comparison of maternal and nursery supplementation strategies
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/291539 |
Resumo: | Maternal probiotic supplementation has been found to have a positive impact on the gut health of piglets, not only during the lactation period, but also after weaning. Providing probiotics to nursery pigs is also a common strategy for supplementation. The goal of this study was to evaluate which would be the most effective strategy to improve nutrient digestibility, energy metabolism, and intestinal health in weaned pigs considering the maternal or nursery options. A total of 32 newly weaned pigs were randomly split into a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement considering maternal probiotic supplementation (with or without) in gestation-lactation and probiotic supplementation in the nursery period (with or without). After weaning, experimental diets were provided for 22 days. Total fecal and urine collection was performed from day 15 to 21. Blood samples were collected from all pigs on days 3 and 22 of the experiment to assess serum biochemistry and intestinal permeability. All pigs were euthanized on day 22 for intestinal tissue collection. Pigs born from probiotic-fed sows had greater (p < 0.05) total tract digestibility of dry matter (+1%) and gross energy (+1.3%), and greater (p < 0.05) metabolizable energy coefficient (+1.3%), which resulted in a 46 kcal/kg increase (p < 0.05) in the metabolizable energy content of the diet. Nitrogen intake (p = 0.035), uptake (p = 0.007), and retention (p = 0.012) were all increased in these pigs. Fecal moisture was reduced in pigs born from probiotic-fed sows and pigs fed the probiotic diet only in the nursery (p < 0.05). Pigs born from probiotic-fed sows had reduced intestinal permeability by 16% (p < 0.05), whereas pigs fed the probiotic diet in the nursery only tended to improve this response (p < 0.10). The villus:crypt ratio of pigs born from probiotic-fed sows was greater compared to the control (p < 0.05), while serum levels of alanine aminotransferase were lower (p < 0.05). Pigs born from probiotic-fed sows had increased nutrient digestibility and improved gut health. Therefore, it is concluded that supplementing the sow diets with probiotics rather than just providing diets in the nursery phase is an advantageous strategy. |
id |
UFRGS-2_4c9ab52b8e61fb8266c6c6ac723a39f8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/291539 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Galli, Gabriela MiottoAndretta, InesLevesque, CrystalStefanello, Thais BastosCarvalho, Camila LopesPerez Pelencia, Jorge YairMartins, Gabriel BuenoCony, Bruna Souza de LimaOliveira, Caroline Romeiro deFranceschi, Carolina HaubertKipper, Marcos2025-05-13T06:55:21Z20242297-1769http://hdl.handle.net/10183/291539001255767Maternal probiotic supplementation has been found to have a positive impact on the gut health of piglets, not only during the lactation period, but also after weaning. Providing probiotics to nursery pigs is also a common strategy for supplementation. The goal of this study was to evaluate which would be the most effective strategy to improve nutrient digestibility, energy metabolism, and intestinal health in weaned pigs considering the maternal or nursery options. A total of 32 newly weaned pigs were randomly split into a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement considering maternal probiotic supplementation (with or without) in gestation-lactation and probiotic supplementation in the nursery period (with or without). After weaning, experimental diets were provided for 22 days. Total fecal and urine collection was performed from day 15 to 21. Blood samples were collected from all pigs on days 3 and 22 of the experiment to assess serum biochemistry and intestinal permeability. All pigs were euthanized on day 22 for intestinal tissue collection. Pigs born from probiotic-fed sows had greater (p < 0.05) total tract digestibility of dry matter (+1%) and gross energy (+1.3%), and greater (p < 0.05) metabolizable energy coefficient (+1.3%), which resulted in a 46 kcal/kg increase (p < 0.05) in the metabolizable energy content of the diet. Nitrogen intake (p = 0.035), uptake (p = 0.007), and retention (p = 0.012) were all increased in these pigs. Fecal moisture was reduced in pigs born from probiotic-fed sows and pigs fed the probiotic diet only in the nursery (p < 0.05). Pigs born from probiotic-fed sows had reduced intestinal permeability by 16% (p < 0.05), whereas pigs fed the probiotic diet in the nursery only tended to improve this response (p < 0.10). The villus:crypt ratio of pigs born from probiotic-fed sows was greater compared to the control (p < 0.05), while serum levels of alanine aminotransferase were lower (p < 0.05). Pigs born from probiotic-fed sows had increased nutrient digestibility and improved gut health. Therefore, it is concluded that supplementing the sow diets with probiotics rather than just providing diets in the nursery phase is an advantageous strategy.application/pdfengFrontiers in Veterinary Science. Lausanne. Vol. 11 (Mar. 2024), [art.] 1356455, 12 p.Nutricao animalLeitãoProbióticoDigestibilidadeMetabolismo animalIntestinal healthNurseryProbioticSerum biochemistrySowPigletUsing probiotics to improve nutrient digestibility and gut-health of weaned pigs : a comparison of maternal and nursery supplementation strategiesEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001255767.pdf.txt001255767.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain59287http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/291539/2/001255767.pdf.txt6a7913d3dea95a327113961f3e3622e8MD52ORIGINAL001255767.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1759975http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/291539/1/001255767.pdf9b38862b1a0669e6415223e787f7b3acMD5110183/2915392025-05-14 06:55:30.432935oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/291539Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestlume@ufrgs.bropendoar:2025-05-14T09:55:30Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Using probiotics to improve nutrient digestibility and gut-health of weaned pigs : a comparison of maternal and nursery supplementation strategies |
title |
Using probiotics to improve nutrient digestibility and gut-health of weaned pigs : a comparison of maternal and nursery supplementation strategies |
spellingShingle |
Using probiotics to improve nutrient digestibility and gut-health of weaned pigs : a comparison of maternal and nursery supplementation strategies Galli, Gabriela Miotto Nutricao animal Leitão Probiótico Digestibilidade Metabolismo animal Intestinal health Nursery Probiotic Serum biochemistry Sow Piglet |
title_short |
Using probiotics to improve nutrient digestibility and gut-health of weaned pigs : a comparison of maternal and nursery supplementation strategies |
title_full |
Using probiotics to improve nutrient digestibility and gut-health of weaned pigs : a comparison of maternal and nursery supplementation strategies |
title_fullStr |
Using probiotics to improve nutrient digestibility and gut-health of weaned pigs : a comparison of maternal and nursery supplementation strategies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Using probiotics to improve nutrient digestibility and gut-health of weaned pigs : a comparison of maternal and nursery supplementation strategies |
title_sort |
Using probiotics to improve nutrient digestibility and gut-health of weaned pigs : a comparison of maternal and nursery supplementation strategies |
author |
Galli, Gabriela Miotto |
author_facet |
Galli, Gabriela Miotto Andretta, Ines Levesque, Crystal Stefanello, Thais Bastos Carvalho, Camila Lopes Perez Pelencia, Jorge Yair Martins, Gabriel Bueno Cony, Bruna Souza de Lima Oliveira, Caroline Romeiro de Franceschi, Carolina Haubert Kipper, Marcos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Andretta, Ines Levesque, Crystal Stefanello, Thais Bastos Carvalho, Camila Lopes Perez Pelencia, Jorge Yair Martins, Gabriel Bueno Cony, Bruna Souza de Lima Oliveira, Caroline Romeiro de Franceschi, Carolina Haubert Kipper, Marcos |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Galli, Gabriela Miotto Andretta, Ines Levesque, Crystal Stefanello, Thais Bastos Carvalho, Camila Lopes Perez Pelencia, Jorge Yair Martins, Gabriel Bueno Cony, Bruna Souza de Lima Oliveira, Caroline Romeiro de Franceschi, Carolina Haubert Kipper, Marcos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nutricao animal Leitão Probiótico Digestibilidade Metabolismo animal |
topic |
Nutricao animal Leitão Probiótico Digestibilidade Metabolismo animal Intestinal health Nursery Probiotic Serum biochemistry Sow Piglet |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Intestinal health Nursery Probiotic Serum biochemistry Sow Piglet |
description |
Maternal probiotic supplementation has been found to have a positive impact on the gut health of piglets, not only during the lactation period, but also after weaning. Providing probiotics to nursery pigs is also a common strategy for supplementation. The goal of this study was to evaluate which would be the most effective strategy to improve nutrient digestibility, energy metabolism, and intestinal health in weaned pigs considering the maternal or nursery options. A total of 32 newly weaned pigs were randomly split into a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement considering maternal probiotic supplementation (with or without) in gestation-lactation and probiotic supplementation in the nursery period (with or without). After weaning, experimental diets were provided for 22 days. Total fecal and urine collection was performed from day 15 to 21. Blood samples were collected from all pigs on days 3 and 22 of the experiment to assess serum biochemistry and intestinal permeability. All pigs were euthanized on day 22 for intestinal tissue collection. Pigs born from probiotic-fed sows had greater (p < 0.05) total tract digestibility of dry matter (+1%) and gross energy (+1.3%), and greater (p < 0.05) metabolizable energy coefficient (+1.3%), which resulted in a 46 kcal/kg increase (p < 0.05) in the metabolizable energy content of the diet. Nitrogen intake (p = 0.035), uptake (p = 0.007), and retention (p = 0.012) were all increased in these pigs. Fecal moisture was reduced in pigs born from probiotic-fed sows and pigs fed the probiotic diet only in the nursery (p < 0.05). Pigs born from probiotic-fed sows had reduced intestinal permeability by 16% (p < 0.05), whereas pigs fed the probiotic diet in the nursery only tended to improve this response (p < 0.10). The villus:crypt ratio of pigs born from probiotic-fed sows was greater compared to the control (p < 0.05), while serum levels of alanine aminotransferase were lower (p < 0.05). Pigs born from probiotic-fed sows had increased nutrient digestibility and improved gut health. Therefore, it is concluded that supplementing the sow diets with probiotics rather than just providing diets in the nursery phase is an advantageous strategy. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2024 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2025-05-13T06:55:21Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/291539 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
2297-1769 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001255767 |
identifier_str_mv |
2297-1769 001255767 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/291539 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science. Lausanne. Vol. 11 (Mar. 2024), [art.] 1356455, 12 p. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/291539/2/001255767.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/291539/1/001255767.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
6a7913d3dea95a327113961f3e3622e8 9b38862b1a0669e6415223e787f7b3ac |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
lume@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1834472610202648576 |