PERIODS OF WEED INTERFERENCE ON TRANSGENIC COTTON ‘IMACD 6001LL’

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Silva, Marcos Paulo da
Publication Date: 2016
Other Authors: Parreira, Mariana Casari, Bressanin, Fernanda Nunes, Alves, Pedro Luis da Costa Aguiar
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Revista Caatinga
Download full: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5341
Summary: The objective of this study was to determine the periods of weed interference and its impact on productivity of cotton 'IMACD 6001LL'. The experiment was conducted in Jaboticabal, São Paulo, the second crop in 2011 and consisted of two treatment groups: the first culture remained free of competing weeds since of emergence up different periods of its development: (0-15 , 0-25, 0-35, 0-45, 0-55, 0-65, 0-75 and 0-183 days - harvest). In the second treatment group was held to the contrary: the crop was in harmony with the weeds since of emergence up to the same stages of development described above. The treatments were arranged in a randomized block design in four replications. During these periods was evaluated dry matter accumulation by weeds. The cotton yield data were subjected to regression analysis and resulting in a CPWC of 35 DAE, the CPWR was 133 DAE and .The weed community was composed mainly of Raphanus raphanistrum, Amaranthus spp., Cyperus rotundus, Alternanthera tenella and Eleusine indica. Living with this community throughout the cycle resulted in reduction almost 85% in cotton yield.
id UFERSA-1_f3d351f59c6df85b563c478028e41f67
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/5341
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling PERIODS OF WEED INTERFERENCE ON TRANSGENIC COTTON ‘IMACD 6001LL’PERÍODOS DE INTERFERÊNCIA DAS PLANTAS DANINHAS EM ALGODOEIRO TRANSGÊNICO IMACD 6001LLGossypium hirsutum. Weed. Competition. Productivity.Gossypium hirsutum. Infestantes. Competição. Produtividade.The objective of this study was to determine the periods of weed interference and its impact on productivity of cotton 'IMACD 6001LL'. The experiment was conducted in Jaboticabal, São Paulo, the second crop in 2011 and consisted of two treatment groups: the first culture remained free of competing weeds since of emergence up different periods of its development: (0-15 , 0-25, 0-35, 0-45, 0-55, 0-65, 0-75 and 0-183 days - harvest). In the second treatment group was held to the contrary: the crop was in harmony with the weeds since of emergence up to the same stages of development described above. The treatments were arranged in a randomized block design in four replications. During these periods was evaluated dry matter accumulation by weeds. The cotton yield data were subjected to regression analysis and resulting in a CPWC of 35 DAE, the CPWR was 133 DAE and .The weed community was composed mainly of Raphanus raphanistrum, Amaranthus spp., Cyperus rotundus, Alternanthera tenella and Eleusine indica. Living with this community throughout the cycle resulted in reduction almost 85% in cotton yield.O objetivo deste trabalho foi determinar os períodos de interferência das plantas daninhas e suas consequências na produtividade da cultura do algodão ‘IMACD 6001LL’. O experimento foi realizado na safrinha 2011 e constou de dois grupos de tratamentos: no primeiro a cultura permaneceu livre da competição das plantas daninhas desde a emergência até épocas crescentes de seu ciclo de desenvolvimento: (0-15; 0-25; 0-35; 0-45; 0-55; 0-65; 0-75 e 0-183 dias - colheita). No segundo grupo de tratamento realizou-se o contrário: a cultura permaneceu em convivência com as plantas daninhas desde a emergência até os mesmos estágios de desenvolvimentos descritos anteriormente. Os tratamentos experimentais foram dispostos no delineamento em blocos casualisados, em quatro repetições. Nestes períodos foi avaliada a matéria seca acumulada pela comunidade infestante geral e específica. Os dados de produtividade do algodoeiro foram submetidos à análise de regressão resultando em um PAI de 35 dias após a emergência (DAE), o PTPI foi de 133 DAE. A comunidade infestante composta principalmente por Raphanus raphanistrum, Amaranthus spp., Cyperus rotundus, Eleusine indica e Alternanthera tenella, presente todo o ciclo da cultura acarretou em quase 85% de perda na produtividade do algodoeiro.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2016-05-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/534110.1590/1983-21252016v29n214rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2016); 375-383Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 2 (2016); 375-3831983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5341/pdf_373Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Marcos Paulo daParreira, Mariana CasariBressanin, Fernanda NunesAlves, Pedro Luis da Costa Aguiar2023-07-19T13:58:27Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/5341Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2023-07-19T13:58:27Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PERIODS OF WEED INTERFERENCE ON TRANSGENIC COTTON ‘IMACD 6001LL’
PERÍODOS DE INTERFERÊNCIA DAS PLANTAS DANINHAS EM ALGODOEIRO TRANSGÊNICO IMACD 6001LL
title PERIODS OF WEED INTERFERENCE ON TRANSGENIC COTTON ‘IMACD 6001LL’
spellingShingle PERIODS OF WEED INTERFERENCE ON TRANSGENIC COTTON ‘IMACD 6001LL’
Silva, Marcos Paulo da
Gossypium hirsutum. Weed. Competition. Productivity.
Gossypium hirsutum. Infestantes. Competição. Produtividade.
title_short PERIODS OF WEED INTERFERENCE ON TRANSGENIC COTTON ‘IMACD 6001LL’
title_full PERIODS OF WEED INTERFERENCE ON TRANSGENIC COTTON ‘IMACD 6001LL’
title_fullStr PERIODS OF WEED INTERFERENCE ON TRANSGENIC COTTON ‘IMACD 6001LL’
title_full_unstemmed PERIODS OF WEED INTERFERENCE ON TRANSGENIC COTTON ‘IMACD 6001LL’
title_sort PERIODS OF WEED INTERFERENCE ON TRANSGENIC COTTON ‘IMACD 6001LL’
author Silva, Marcos Paulo da
author_facet Silva, Marcos Paulo da
Parreira, Mariana Casari
Bressanin, Fernanda Nunes
Alves, Pedro Luis da Costa Aguiar
author_role author
author2 Parreira, Mariana Casari
Bressanin, Fernanda Nunes
Alves, Pedro Luis da Costa Aguiar
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Marcos Paulo da
Parreira, Mariana Casari
Bressanin, Fernanda Nunes
Alves, Pedro Luis da Costa Aguiar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gossypium hirsutum. Weed. Competition. Productivity.
Gossypium hirsutum. Infestantes. Competição. Produtividade.
topic Gossypium hirsutum. Weed. Competition. Productivity.
Gossypium hirsutum. Infestantes. Competição. Produtividade.
description The objective of this study was to determine the periods of weed interference and its impact on productivity of cotton 'IMACD 6001LL'. The experiment was conducted in Jaboticabal, São Paulo, the second crop in 2011 and consisted of two treatment groups: the first culture remained free of competing weeds since of emergence up different periods of its development: (0-15 , 0-25, 0-35, 0-45, 0-55, 0-65, 0-75 and 0-183 days - harvest). In the second treatment group was held to the contrary: the crop was in harmony with the weeds since of emergence up to the same stages of development described above. The treatments were arranged in a randomized block design in four replications. During these periods was evaluated dry matter accumulation by weeds. The cotton yield data were subjected to regression analysis and resulting in a CPWC of 35 DAE, the CPWR was 133 DAE and .The weed community was composed mainly of Raphanus raphanistrum, Amaranthus spp., Cyperus rotundus, Alternanthera tenella and Eleusine indica. Living with this community throughout the cycle resulted in reduction almost 85% in cotton yield.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-05-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5341
10.1590/1983-21252016v29n214rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5341
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252016v29n214rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/5341/pdf_373
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2016); 375-383
Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 2 (2016); 375-383
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1831468649289875456