Reaction of non-cucurbitacea to Monosporascus spp.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bento Tavares, Moises
Publication Date: 2022
Other Authors: Mitsa Paiva Negreiros, Andreia, Luzia Alves Cavalcante, Allinny, Hellen Fernandes de Oliveira, Sara, Armengol, Josep, Sales Júnior, Rui
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
Download full: http://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/85009
Summary: With the recent discovery of five new species of the Monosporascus genus, a fungal genus involved in “Monosporascus root rot and vine decline,” pathogenicity studies have become important to understand the impact of these new species on cultivated plants, mainly on plant species used as an alternative for crop rotation. This study aimed to evaluate the pathogenicity of Monosporascus spp. in non-cucurbitaceous cultures. The tests were carried out in duplicate in a greenhouse in a completely randomized design, with the treatments: One isolate of each species of Monosporascus (M. brasiliensis, M. caatinguensis, M. cannonballus, M. mossoroensis, M. nordestinus, and M. semiaridus) and the absolute control, and five cultures (cowpea, jack bean, corn, sorghum, and bell pepper). Seeds of these cultures were sown in pots containing soil + Tropstrate HT® (ratio 2:1, v / v), previously inoculated with wheat seeds colonized with the species of Monosporascus. After 50 days of sowing, plants were evaluated for incidence, disease severity, length of shoot and roots, fresh and dry weight of shoots and roots. All inoculated Monosporascus species were able to induce damage in cowpea and bell pepper cultures, with M. cannonballus being the most aggressive. Corn, jack beans, and sorghum presented few or no symptoms of the disease and may be indicated as alternative cultures to be used in crop rotation with cucurbits. Studies with a greater number of isolates and cultivars for each culture tested in this study should be carried out to strengthen the data obtained.
id UFC-2_89d33afd5829a3721bc4f7e65cd38d85
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/85009
network_acronym_str UFC-2
network_name_str Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Reaction of non-cucurbitacea to Monosporascus spp.Crop rotation. Host range. Pathogenicity test. Soilborne pathogen. Virulence.With the recent discovery of five new species of the Monosporascus genus, a fungal genus involved in “Monosporascus root rot and vine decline,” pathogenicity studies have become important to understand the impact of these new species on cultivated plants, mainly on plant species used as an alternative for crop rotation. This study aimed to evaluate the pathogenicity of Monosporascus spp. in non-cucurbitaceous cultures. The tests were carried out in duplicate in a greenhouse in a completely randomized design, with the treatments: One isolate of each species of Monosporascus (M. brasiliensis, M. caatinguensis, M. cannonballus, M. mossoroensis, M. nordestinus, and M. semiaridus) and the absolute control, and five cultures (cowpea, jack bean, corn, sorghum, and bell pepper). Seeds of these cultures were sown in pots containing soil + Tropstrate HT® (ratio 2:1, v / v), previously inoculated with wheat seeds colonized with the species of Monosporascus. After 50 days of sowing, plants were evaluated for incidence, disease severity, length of shoot and roots, fresh and dry weight of shoots and roots. All inoculated Monosporascus species were able to induce damage in cowpea and bell pepper cultures, with M. cannonballus being the most aggressive. Corn, jack beans, and sorghum presented few or no symptoms of the disease and may be indicated as alternative cultures to be used in crop rotation with cucurbits. Studies with a greater number of isolates and cultivars for each culture tested in this study should be carried out to strengthen the data obtained.Revista Ciência Agronômica2022-11-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/85009Revista Ciência Agronômica; v. 54 (2023)1806-66900045-6888reponame:Revista ciência agronômica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCenghttp://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/85009/229161Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Ciência Agronômicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBento Tavares, MoisesMitsa Paiva Negreiros, AndreiaLuzia Alves Cavalcante, AllinnyHellen Fernandes de Oliveira, SaraArmengol, JosepSales Júnior, Rui2023-07-14T12:18:07Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/85009Revistahttps://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/oai||alekdutra@ufc.br|| ccarev@ufc.br1806-66900045-6888opendoar:2023-07-14T12:18:07Revista ciência agronômica (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reaction of non-cucurbitacea to Monosporascus spp.
title Reaction of non-cucurbitacea to Monosporascus spp.
spellingShingle Reaction of non-cucurbitacea to Monosporascus spp.
Bento Tavares, Moises
Crop rotation. Host range. Pathogenicity test. Soilborne pathogen. Virulence.
title_short Reaction of non-cucurbitacea to Monosporascus spp.
title_full Reaction of non-cucurbitacea to Monosporascus spp.
title_fullStr Reaction of non-cucurbitacea to Monosporascus spp.
title_full_unstemmed Reaction of non-cucurbitacea to Monosporascus spp.
title_sort Reaction of non-cucurbitacea to Monosporascus spp.
author Bento Tavares, Moises
author_facet Bento Tavares, Moises
Mitsa Paiva Negreiros, Andreia
Luzia Alves Cavalcante, Allinny
Hellen Fernandes de Oliveira, Sara
Armengol, Josep
Sales Júnior, Rui
author_role author
author2 Mitsa Paiva Negreiros, Andreia
Luzia Alves Cavalcante, Allinny
Hellen Fernandes de Oliveira, Sara
Armengol, Josep
Sales Júnior, Rui
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bento Tavares, Moises
Mitsa Paiva Negreiros, Andreia
Luzia Alves Cavalcante, Allinny
Hellen Fernandes de Oliveira, Sara
Armengol, Josep
Sales Júnior, Rui
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Crop rotation. Host range. Pathogenicity test. Soilborne pathogen. Virulence.
topic Crop rotation. Host range. Pathogenicity test. Soilborne pathogen. Virulence.
description With the recent discovery of five new species of the Monosporascus genus, a fungal genus involved in “Monosporascus root rot and vine decline,” pathogenicity studies have become important to understand the impact of these new species on cultivated plants, mainly on plant species used as an alternative for crop rotation. This study aimed to evaluate the pathogenicity of Monosporascus spp. in non-cucurbitaceous cultures. The tests were carried out in duplicate in a greenhouse in a completely randomized design, with the treatments: One isolate of each species of Monosporascus (M. brasiliensis, M. caatinguensis, M. cannonballus, M. mossoroensis, M. nordestinus, and M. semiaridus) and the absolute control, and five cultures (cowpea, jack bean, corn, sorghum, and bell pepper). Seeds of these cultures were sown in pots containing soil + Tropstrate HT® (ratio 2:1, v / v), previously inoculated with wheat seeds colonized with the species of Monosporascus. After 50 days of sowing, plants were evaluated for incidence, disease severity, length of shoot and roots, fresh and dry weight of shoots and roots. All inoculated Monosporascus species were able to induce damage in cowpea and bell pepper cultures, with M. cannonballus being the most aggressive. Corn, jack beans, and sorghum presented few or no symptoms of the disease and may be indicated as alternative cultures to be used in crop rotation with cucurbits. Studies with a greater number of isolates and cultivars for each culture tested in this study should be carried out to strengthen the data obtained.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/85009
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/85009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/85009/229161
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Ciência Agronômica
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Ciência Agronômica
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ciência Agronômica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ciência Agronômica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ciência Agronômica; v. 54 (2023)
1806-6690
0045-6888
reponame:Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
collection Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista ciência agronômica (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||alekdutra@ufc.br|| ccarev@ufc.br
_version_ 1826232467096338432