Phytogenic blend protective effects against microbes but affects health and production in broilers

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Galli G.M.*
Publication Date: 2021
Other Authors: Petrolli T.G.*, Aniecevski E.*, Santo A.D.*, Leite F.*, Griss L.G., Dazuk V.*, Boiago M.M., dos Santos H.V., Simoes C.A.D.P., Wagner R., Bissacotti B.F., Schentiger M.R., Da Silva A.S.*
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da Udesc
dARK ID: ark:/33523/0013000000m3c
Download full: https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/3881
Summary: © 2020 Elsevier LtdThe aim of this study was to determine whether addition of a phytogenic blend in the feed of broilers to replace conventional antimicrobials as a performance enhancer would improve or maintain productive efficiency. The phytogenic blend was based on curcuminoids, cinnamaldehyde and glycerol monolaurate. We used 480 birds divided into three groups with eight repetitions per group and 20 birds per repetition. The groups were identified as antimicrobial-treated: basal feed with antibiotics and coccidiostatic agents; phytogenic blend: basal feed with blend; and control, only basal feed. Zootechnical performance was measured on days from 1 to 42, with body weight measured at days 1, 7, 21 and 42. We collected excreta for parasitological analysis and total bacterial counts to determine if the phytogenic blend had kept the bacteria and coccidia in counts smaller or similar to that resulting from use of conventional performance enhancer. Other variables were also measured to complement our research, i.e., if the consumption of bend is good for the health of the birds (without causing toxicity and negatively altering the metabolism and intestinal morphometry) and does not interfere in the quality of the meat. Because the bacteria are often opportunistic, we challenged all birds at 23 days of age with high doses of oral oocysts (28,000 oocysts). Birds supplemented with the blend showed inferior performance compared to birds in the control and antimicrobial treated group (P < 0.05). We found a smaller number of oocysts of Eimeria spp. in the excreta at 42 days in the treatment with blend and antimicrobial treated group (P < 0.05). In terms of total bacterial counts, there were lower counts in the birds of the blend group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The blend increased the yellow intensity and the luminosity of the meat (P < 0.05), as well as cooking weight losses (P < 0.05) compared those of the control. We observed higher total levels of saturated fatty acids in meat from the blend and antimicrobial treated group (P < 0.05), as well as lower levels of monounsaturated fatty acids in the blend group (P < 0.05). The inclusion of a phytogenic blend to replace conventional antimicrobials and anticoccidial agents in the diet of chickens was able to control bacteria as well as coccidia; however, it ends up harming health and production.
id UDESC-2_60aa4fd57153fe7b0f5ec9c26b002289
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/3881
network_acronym_str UDESC-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository_id_str 6391
spelling Phytogenic blend protective effects against microbes but affects health and production in broilers© 2020 Elsevier LtdThe aim of this study was to determine whether addition of a phytogenic blend in the feed of broilers to replace conventional antimicrobials as a performance enhancer would improve or maintain productive efficiency. The phytogenic blend was based on curcuminoids, cinnamaldehyde and glycerol monolaurate. We used 480 birds divided into three groups with eight repetitions per group and 20 birds per repetition. The groups were identified as antimicrobial-treated: basal feed with antibiotics and coccidiostatic agents; phytogenic blend: basal feed with blend; and control, only basal feed. Zootechnical performance was measured on days from 1 to 42, with body weight measured at days 1, 7, 21 and 42. We collected excreta for parasitological analysis and total bacterial counts to determine if the phytogenic blend had kept the bacteria and coccidia in counts smaller or similar to that resulting from use of conventional performance enhancer. Other variables were also measured to complement our research, i.e., if the consumption of bend is good for the health of the birds (without causing toxicity and negatively altering the metabolism and intestinal morphometry) and does not interfere in the quality of the meat. Because the bacteria are often opportunistic, we challenged all birds at 23 days of age with high doses of oral oocysts (28,000 oocysts). Birds supplemented with the blend showed inferior performance compared to birds in the control and antimicrobial treated group (P < 0.05). We found a smaller number of oocysts of Eimeria spp. in the excreta at 42 days in the treatment with blend and antimicrobial treated group (P < 0.05). In terms of total bacterial counts, there were lower counts in the birds of the blend group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The blend increased the yellow intensity and the luminosity of the meat (P < 0.05), as well as cooking weight losses (P < 0.05) compared those of the control. We observed higher total levels of saturated fatty acids in meat from the blend and antimicrobial treated group (P < 0.05), as well as lower levels of monounsaturated fatty acids in the blend group (P < 0.05). The inclusion of a phytogenic blend to replace conventional antimicrobials and anticoccidial agents in the diet of chickens was able to control bacteria as well as coccidia; however, it ends up harming health and production.2024-12-06T11:38:58Z2021info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1096-120810.1016/j.micpath.2020.104590https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/3881ark:/33523/0013000000m3cMicrobial Pathogenesis152Galli G.M.*Petrolli T.G.*Aniecevski E.*Santo A.D.*Leite F.*Griss L.G.Dazuk V.*Boiago M.M.dos Santos H.V.Simoes C.A.D.P.Wagner R.Bissacotti B.F.Schentiger M.R.Da Silva A.S.*engreponame:Repositório Institucional da Udescinstname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-07T20:43:00Zoai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/3881Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://pergamumweb.udesc.br/biblioteca/index.phpPRIhttps://repositorio-api.udesc.br/server/oai/requestri@udesc.bropendoar:63912024-12-07T20:43Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Phytogenic blend protective effects against microbes but affects health and production in broilers
title Phytogenic blend protective effects against microbes but affects health and production in broilers
spellingShingle Phytogenic blend protective effects against microbes but affects health and production in broilers
Galli G.M.*
title_short Phytogenic blend protective effects against microbes but affects health and production in broilers
title_full Phytogenic blend protective effects against microbes but affects health and production in broilers
title_fullStr Phytogenic blend protective effects against microbes but affects health and production in broilers
title_full_unstemmed Phytogenic blend protective effects against microbes but affects health and production in broilers
title_sort Phytogenic blend protective effects against microbes but affects health and production in broilers
author Galli G.M.*
author_facet Galli G.M.*
Petrolli T.G.*
Aniecevski E.*
Santo A.D.*
Leite F.*
Griss L.G.
Dazuk V.*
Boiago M.M.
dos Santos H.V.
Simoes C.A.D.P.
Wagner R.
Bissacotti B.F.
Schentiger M.R.
Da Silva A.S.*
author_role author
author2 Petrolli T.G.*
Aniecevski E.*
Santo A.D.*
Leite F.*
Griss L.G.
Dazuk V.*
Boiago M.M.
dos Santos H.V.
Simoes C.A.D.P.
Wagner R.
Bissacotti B.F.
Schentiger M.R.
Da Silva A.S.*
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Galli G.M.*
Petrolli T.G.*
Aniecevski E.*
Santo A.D.*
Leite F.*
Griss L.G.
Dazuk V.*
Boiago M.M.
dos Santos H.V.
Simoes C.A.D.P.
Wagner R.
Bissacotti B.F.
Schentiger M.R.
Da Silva A.S.*
description © 2020 Elsevier LtdThe aim of this study was to determine whether addition of a phytogenic blend in the feed of broilers to replace conventional antimicrobials as a performance enhancer would improve or maintain productive efficiency. The phytogenic blend was based on curcuminoids, cinnamaldehyde and glycerol monolaurate. We used 480 birds divided into three groups with eight repetitions per group and 20 birds per repetition. The groups were identified as antimicrobial-treated: basal feed with antibiotics and coccidiostatic agents; phytogenic blend: basal feed with blend; and control, only basal feed. Zootechnical performance was measured on days from 1 to 42, with body weight measured at days 1, 7, 21 and 42. We collected excreta for parasitological analysis and total bacterial counts to determine if the phytogenic blend had kept the bacteria and coccidia in counts smaller or similar to that resulting from use of conventional performance enhancer. Other variables were also measured to complement our research, i.e., if the consumption of bend is good for the health of the birds (without causing toxicity and negatively altering the metabolism and intestinal morphometry) and does not interfere in the quality of the meat. Because the bacteria are often opportunistic, we challenged all birds at 23 days of age with high doses of oral oocysts (28,000 oocysts). Birds supplemented with the blend showed inferior performance compared to birds in the control and antimicrobial treated group (P < 0.05). We found a smaller number of oocysts of Eimeria spp. in the excreta at 42 days in the treatment with blend and antimicrobial treated group (P < 0.05). In terms of total bacterial counts, there were lower counts in the birds of the blend group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The blend increased the yellow intensity and the luminosity of the meat (P < 0.05), as well as cooking weight losses (P < 0.05) compared those of the control. We observed higher total levels of saturated fatty acids in meat from the blend and antimicrobial treated group (P < 0.05), as well as lower levels of monounsaturated fatty acids in the blend group (P < 0.05). The inclusion of a phytogenic blend to replace conventional antimicrobials and anticoccidial agents in the diet of chickens was able to control bacteria as well as coccidia; however, it ends up harming health and production.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
2024-12-06T11:38:58Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 1096-1208
10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104590
https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/3881
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/33523/0013000000m3c
identifier_str_mv 1096-1208
10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104590
ark:/33523/0013000000m3c
url https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/3881
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Microbial Pathogenesis
152
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Udesc
instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron:UDESC
instname_str Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron_str UDESC
institution UDESC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
collection Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ri@udesc.br
_version_ 1842258071307419648