Functional Tests As Predictors Of Balance, Fear, And Risk Of Falling In Healthy Subjects

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Veras T.G.*
Publication Date: 2022
Other Authors: Venancio R.S.*, Klein S.R.*, Heinz P.D.R.*, Gulart, Aline Almeida, Munari, Anelise Bauer, Mayer, Anamaria Fleig
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da Udesc
dARK ID: ark:/33523/0013000009wt2
Download full: https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/3455
Summary: © 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.Objective: Verify which test, Glitttre-ADL test (TGlittre) or six-minute walk test (6MWT), better predicts balance, fear, and risk of falling in middle-aged and older adults. Method: Twenty-eight individuals (15 women) completed the study protocol, which included: anthropometric assessment, spirometry, Falls Efficacy Scale-International-Brazil (FES-I-Brazil), Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), TGlittre, and 6MWT. The Shapiro Wilk test investigated the distribution of the data. To verify if there was a correlation between the performance in TGlittre and 6MWT and the balance, fear, and risk of falling variables, the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient were used. Simple linear regression and stepwise multiple linear regression were conducted to identify which functional capacity test better predicts balance, fear, and risk of falling. Results: Both TGlittre and 6MWT correlated (r = 0.44, p = .02 and r = −0.59, p = .003, respectively) and were able to predict the TUG (R2 = 0.17 and R2 = 0.26, p < .005, respectively). However, when analyzed in a multiple regression model, the 6MWT was better predictor of TUG (26%). Only TGlittre correlated (r = 0.39 and r = −0.38, p = .04) and was able to predict the FES-I-Brazil and BBS scores (17%), suggesting that TGlittre better reflects the worry about falls and balance in multiple ADL contexts. Conclusions: The 6MWT and the TGlittre are able to predict balance assessed by the TUG. However, the 6MWT has proved to be more effective in predicting TUG results.
id UDESC-2_4c468f8eddea4b90f8f963443facf403
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/3455
network_acronym_str UDESC-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository_id_str 6391
spelling Functional Tests As Predictors Of Balance, Fear, And Risk Of Falling In Healthy Subjects© 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.Objective: Verify which test, Glitttre-ADL test (TGlittre) or six-minute walk test (6MWT), better predicts balance, fear, and risk of falling in middle-aged and older adults. Method: Twenty-eight individuals (15 women) completed the study protocol, which included: anthropometric assessment, spirometry, Falls Efficacy Scale-International-Brazil (FES-I-Brazil), Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), TGlittre, and 6MWT. The Shapiro Wilk test investigated the distribution of the data. To verify if there was a correlation between the performance in TGlittre and 6MWT and the balance, fear, and risk of falling variables, the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient were used. Simple linear regression and stepwise multiple linear regression were conducted to identify which functional capacity test better predicts balance, fear, and risk of falling. Results: Both TGlittre and 6MWT correlated (r = 0.44, p = .02 and r = −0.59, p = .003, respectively) and were able to predict the TUG (R2 = 0.17 and R2 = 0.26, p < .005, respectively). However, when analyzed in a multiple regression model, the 6MWT was better predictor of TUG (26%). Only TGlittre correlated (r = 0.39 and r = −0.38, p = .04) and was able to predict the FES-I-Brazil and BBS scores (17%), suggesting that TGlittre better reflects the worry about falls and balance in multiple ADL contexts. Conclusions: The 6MWT and the TGlittre are able to predict balance assessed by the TUG. However, the 6MWT has proved to be more effective in predicting TUG results.2024-12-05T23:12:15Z2022info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlep. 2213 - 22211532-504010.1080/09593985.2021.1894621https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/3455ark:/33523/0013000009wt2Physiotherapy Theory and Practice3812Veras T.G.*Venancio R.S.*Klein S.R.*Heinz P.D.R.*Gulart, Aline AlmeidaMunari, Anelise BauerMayer, Anamaria Fleigengreponame:Repositório Institucional da Udescinstname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-07T20:41:45Zoai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/3455Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://pergamumweb.udesc.br/biblioteca/index.phpPRIhttps://repositorio-api.udesc.br/server/oai/requestri@udesc.bropendoar:63912024-12-07T20:41:45Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Functional Tests As Predictors Of Balance, Fear, And Risk Of Falling In Healthy Subjects
title Functional Tests As Predictors Of Balance, Fear, And Risk Of Falling In Healthy Subjects
spellingShingle Functional Tests As Predictors Of Balance, Fear, And Risk Of Falling In Healthy Subjects
Veras T.G.*
title_short Functional Tests As Predictors Of Balance, Fear, And Risk Of Falling In Healthy Subjects
title_full Functional Tests As Predictors Of Balance, Fear, And Risk Of Falling In Healthy Subjects
title_fullStr Functional Tests As Predictors Of Balance, Fear, And Risk Of Falling In Healthy Subjects
title_full_unstemmed Functional Tests As Predictors Of Balance, Fear, And Risk Of Falling In Healthy Subjects
title_sort Functional Tests As Predictors Of Balance, Fear, And Risk Of Falling In Healthy Subjects
author Veras T.G.*
author_facet Veras T.G.*
Venancio R.S.*
Klein S.R.*
Heinz P.D.R.*
Gulart, Aline Almeida
Munari, Anelise Bauer
Mayer, Anamaria Fleig
author_role author
author2 Venancio R.S.*
Klein S.R.*
Heinz P.D.R.*
Gulart, Aline Almeida
Munari, Anelise Bauer
Mayer, Anamaria Fleig
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Veras T.G.*
Venancio R.S.*
Klein S.R.*
Heinz P.D.R.*
Gulart, Aline Almeida
Munari, Anelise Bauer
Mayer, Anamaria Fleig
description © 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.Objective: Verify which test, Glitttre-ADL test (TGlittre) or six-minute walk test (6MWT), better predicts balance, fear, and risk of falling in middle-aged and older adults. Method: Twenty-eight individuals (15 women) completed the study protocol, which included: anthropometric assessment, spirometry, Falls Efficacy Scale-International-Brazil (FES-I-Brazil), Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), TGlittre, and 6MWT. The Shapiro Wilk test investigated the distribution of the data. To verify if there was a correlation between the performance in TGlittre and 6MWT and the balance, fear, and risk of falling variables, the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient were used. Simple linear regression and stepwise multiple linear regression were conducted to identify which functional capacity test better predicts balance, fear, and risk of falling. Results: Both TGlittre and 6MWT correlated (r = 0.44, p = .02 and r = −0.59, p = .003, respectively) and were able to predict the TUG (R2 = 0.17 and R2 = 0.26, p < .005, respectively). However, when analyzed in a multiple regression model, the 6MWT was better predictor of TUG (26%). Only TGlittre correlated (r = 0.39 and r = −0.38, p = .04) and was able to predict the FES-I-Brazil and BBS scores (17%), suggesting that TGlittre better reflects the worry about falls and balance in multiple ADL contexts. Conclusions: The 6MWT and the TGlittre are able to predict balance assessed by the TUG. However, the 6MWT has proved to be more effective in predicting TUG results.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2024-12-05T23:12:15Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 1532-5040
10.1080/09593985.2021.1894621
https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/3455
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/33523/0013000009wt2
identifier_str_mv 1532-5040
10.1080/09593985.2021.1894621
ark:/33523/0013000009wt2
url https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/3455
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
38
12
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv p. 2213 - 2221
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Udesc
instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron:UDESC
instname_str Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron_str UDESC
institution UDESC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
collection Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ri@udesc.br
_version_ 1848168361250258944