Fatores que estruturam metacomunidades em fitotelmos de restinga

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nallis, Bruna Golinelli
Publication Date: 2020
Format: Master thesis
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
Download full: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/13796
Summary: Neotropical ecosystems harbour an imense biodiversity, covering phytophysiognomies with unique characteristics. The restingas are phyto-physiognomies characteristic of coastal regions, with hot temperatures, poor soils and low water availability, characteristics that make survival difficult in this region, however there are plant species that make life in these places easier. An example is the Bromeliacea family, which has species with phytothelmos capable of retaining water and organic matter, creating an opportunistic environment for other forms of life.. Considering the fact that these plants have unique characteristics to harbor other organisms, each bromeliad can be considered as a habitat patch within a metacommunity. We studied the factors responsible for the structuring of the metacommunity in two species of bromeliad: Aechmea nudicaulis (low phytotelmata heterogeneity) and Vriesea friburgensis (high phytotelmata heterogeneity) in a restinga from south Brazil. We found that communities are composed by many common and few rare invertebrate species. Only a small proportion of community composition variation (10%) was related to the explanatory factors considered, with bromeliad species and the vegetation cover index (NDVI) around the plants being the most relevant. The results also show that, contrary to expectations, bromeliads with greater habitat heterogeneity (V. friburgensis) had less species richness. Applying rank abundance models, we found that the individual communities were similar to null models, without apparent structuring by species niche processes. However, when the communities were grouped by plant species (summing the abundance of several bromeliads), we found that the Zipf and Mandelbrot models, which consider patch dynamics of colonization and extinction by generalist and specialist species, were the most suitable models. Our results demonstrate that the bromeliad communities do not behave individually as isolated systems, but rather as habitat patches within a metacommunity, whith random patch dynamics of colonization and local extinctions in a set of bromeliads. Understanding this metacommunity dynamic helps us to understand the importance of conserving restinga areas to preserve Neotropical biodiversity.
id SCAR_ae5cca1813f393fe2b1fac0c31e6d2c1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:20.500.14289/13796
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str 4322
spelling Nallis, Bruna GolinelliPires, José Salatiel Rodrigueshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3412204514901170Saito, Victor Satoruhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3312862423985585http://lattes.cnpq.br/4307445259869165cd3b5fb7-777f-41bf-8e45-828e9cd9ecb02021-02-01T12:38:29Z2021-02-01T12:38:29Z2020-11-26NALLIS, Bruna Golinelli. Fatores que estruturam metacomunidades em fitotelmos de restinga. 2020. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2020. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/13796.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/13796Neotropical ecosystems harbour an imense biodiversity, covering phytophysiognomies with unique characteristics. The restingas are phyto-physiognomies characteristic of coastal regions, with hot temperatures, poor soils and low water availability, characteristics that make survival difficult in this region, however there are plant species that make life in these places easier. An example is the Bromeliacea family, which has species with phytothelmos capable of retaining water and organic matter, creating an opportunistic environment for other forms of life.. Considering the fact that these plants have unique characteristics to harbor other organisms, each bromeliad can be considered as a habitat patch within a metacommunity. We studied the factors responsible for the structuring of the metacommunity in two species of bromeliad: Aechmea nudicaulis (low phytotelmata heterogeneity) and Vriesea friburgensis (high phytotelmata heterogeneity) in a restinga from south Brazil. We found that communities are composed by many common and few rare invertebrate species. Only a small proportion of community composition variation (10%) was related to the explanatory factors considered, with bromeliad species and the vegetation cover index (NDVI) around the plants being the most relevant. The results also show that, contrary to expectations, bromeliads with greater habitat heterogeneity (V. friburgensis) had less species richness. Applying rank abundance models, we found that the individual communities were similar to null models, without apparent structuring by species niche processes. However, when the communities were grouped by plant species (summing the abundance of several bromeliads), we found that the Zipf and Mandelbrot models, which consider patch dynamics of colonization and extinction by generalist and specialist species, were the most suitable models. Our results demonstrate that the bromeliad communities do not behave individually as isolated systems, but rather as habitat patches within a metacommunity, whith random patch dynamics of colonization and local extinctions in a set of bromeliads. Understanding this metacommunity dynamic helps us to understand the importance of conserving restinga areas to preserve Neotropical biodiversity.Os ecossistemas neotropicais abrigam uma imensa biodiversidade, cobrindo fitofisionomias com características únicas. As restingas são fitofisionomias características das regiões costeiras, com temperaturas quentes, solos pobres e baixa disponibilidade de água, características que dificultam a sobrevivencia nessa região, contudo existem espécies vegetais que tornam a vida nesses locais mais facíl. Um exemplo é a família Bromeliacea, que possui espécies com fitotelmos capazes de reter água e matéria orgânica, criando um ambiente oportunista para outras formas de vida. Considerando o fato de que essas plantas têm características únicas para abrigar outros organismos, cada bromélia pode ser considerada como um fragmento de habitat dentro de uma metacomunidade. Estudamos os fatores responsáveis pela estruturação da metacomunidade de macroinvertebrados em duas espécies de bromélias: Aechmea nudicaulis (baixa heterogeneidade de fitotelmata) e Vriesea friburgensis (alta heterogeneidade de fitotelmata) em uma restinga do sul do Brasil. Descobrimos que as comunidades são compostas por muitas espécies comuns e poucas de invertebrados raros. Apenas uma pequena proporção da variação da composição da comunidade (10%) foi relacionada aos fatores explicativos considerados, sendo as espécies de bromélias e o índice de cobertura vegetal (NDVI) ao redor das plantas os mais relevantes. Os resultados também mostram que, ao contrário do esperado, as bromélias com maior heterogeneidade de habitat (V. friburgensis) apresentaram menor riqueza de espécies. Aplicando modelos de ranquaeamento de abundância, descobrimos que as comunidades individuais eram semelhantes aos modelos nulos, sem aparente estruturação por processos de nicho de espécies. No entanto, quando as comunidades foram agrupadas por espécies vegetais (somando a abundância de várias bromélias), descobrimos que os modelos de Zipf e Mandelbrot, que consideram a dinâmica de manchas de colonização e extinção por espécies generalistas e especializadas, eram os modelos mais adequados. Nossos resultados demonstram que as comunidades de bromélias não se comportam individualmente como sistemas isolados, mas como manchas de habitat dentro de uma metacomunidade, com dinâmica aleatória de manchas de colonização e extinções locais em um conjunto de bromélias. O entendimento dessa dinâmica de metacomunidade nos ajuda a entender a importância de conservar áreas de restinga para preservar a biodiversidade neotropical.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)engUniversidade Federal de São CarlosCâmpus São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais - PPGERNUFSCarAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBromeliasFlorianópolisMacroinvertebradosMata AtlânticaBromeliadsMacroinvertebratesAtlantic ForestCIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIAFatores que estruturam metacomunidades em fitotelmos de restingaThe structure of a phytotelmata metacommunity in restingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis60060016d5af69-f991-49e3-b1de-5866f0202ea7reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINALFatores que estruturam metacomunidades em restinga.pdfFatores que estruturam metacomunidades em restinga.pdfDissertação sobre metacomunidadesapplication/pdf705442https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/82dc730d-5cf0-48c9-b27d-29d21c16b949/download708255c3375ffb86a9debea85f41ea16MD51trueAnonymousREADCarta_Comprovante_VERSÃOFINAL_da_Dissetação-Tese.pdfCarta_Comprovante_VERSÃOFINAL_da_Dissetação-Tese.pdfCarta comprovanteapplication/pdf488335https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/de419b81-e2a7-4f9e-805f-f12a1b2e8767/download211e00cdfe1c2a07a295fd4cc488e4a2MD53falseAnonymousREAD2020-11-10CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8811https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/aff7c55d-8fad-45ac-83e7-4feba8425374/downloade39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34MD54falseAnonymousREADTEXTFatores que estruturam metacomunidades em restinga.pdf.txtFatores que estruturam metacomunidades em restinga.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain65261https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/70600587-a560-4047-9379-b09cfa998127/downloaddba9c90b75b0362bc1ff227630faf9bdMD59falseAnonymousREADCarta_Comprovante_VERSÃOFINAL_da_Dissetação-Tese.pdf.txtCarta_Comprovante_VERSÃOFINAL_da_Dissetação-Tese.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain859https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/d5b3d157-1bee-4e62-b71b-b66b4261dc8b/download18c0b5b48b1e94f18a65dd69d0f19abcMD511falseAnonymousREAD2020-11-10THUMBNAILFatores que estruturam metacomunidades em restinga.pdf.jpgFatores que estruturam metacomunidades em restinga.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4028https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/1263a763-adde-4e88-b970-b3de1197fd67/download2c7cdb5a0539b438aed79a9c2cbe50feMD510falseAnonymousREADCarta_Comprovante_VERSÃOFINAL_da_Dissetação-Tese.pdf.jpgCarta_Comprovante_VERSÃOFINAL_da_Dissetação-Tese.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg14057https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/3e25b5ae-64ae-498b-85df-e75ad35299ab/downloadf31448a10d83b042436c40700bee7659MD512falseAnonymousREAD2020-11-1020.500.14289/137962025-02-05 18:37:29.94http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilopen.accessoai:repositorio.ufscar.br:20.500.14289/13796https://repositorio.ufscar.brRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestrepositorio.sibi@ufscar.bropendoar:43222025-02-05T21:37:29Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Fatores que estruturam metacomunidades em fitotelmos de restinga
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv The structure of a phytotelmata metacommunity in restinga
title Fatores que estruturam metacomunidades em fitotelmos de restinga
spellingShingle Fatores que estruturam metacomunidades em fitotelmos de restinga
Nallis, Bruna Golinelli
Bromelias
Florianópolis
Macroinvertebrados
Mata Atlântica
Bromeliads
Macroinvertebrates
Atlantic Forest
CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA
title_short Fatores que estruturam metacomunidades em fitotelmos de restinga
title_full Fatores que estruturam metacomunidades em fitotelmos de restinga
title_fullStr Fatores que estruturam metacomunidades em fitotelmos de restinga
title_full_unstemmed Fatores que estruturam metacomunidades em fitotelmos de restinga
title_sort Fatores que estruturam metacomunidades em fitotelmos de restinga
author Nallis, Bruna Golinelli
author_facet Nallis, Bruna Golinelli
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4307445259869165
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nallis, Bruna Golinelli
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Pires, José Salatiel Rodrigues
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3412204514901170
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv Saito, Victor Satoru
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3312862423985585
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv cd3b5fb7-777f-41bf-8e45-828e9cd9ecb0
contributor_str_mv Pires, José Salatiel Rodrigues
Saito, Victor Satoru
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bromelias
Florianópolis
Macroinvertebrados
Mata Atlântica
topic Bromelias
Florianópolis
Macroinvertebrados
Mata Atlântica
Bromeliads
Macroinvertebrates
Atlantic Forest
CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Bromeliads
Macroinvertebrates
Atlantic Forest
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA
description Neotropical ecosystems harbour an imense biodiversity, covering phytophysiognomies with unique characteristics. The restingas are phyto-physiognomies characteristic of coastal regions, with hot temperatures, poor soils and low water availability, characteristics that make survival difficult in this region, however there are plant species that make life in these places easier. An example is the Bromeliacea family, which has species with phytothelmos capable of retaining water and organic matter, creating an opportunistic environment for other forms of life.. Considering the fact that these plants have unique characteristics to harbor other organisms, each bromeliad can be considered as a habitat patch within a metacommunity. We studied the factors responsible for the structuring of the metacommunity in two species of bromeliad: Aechmea nudicaulis (low phytotelmata heterogeneity) and Vriesea friburgensis (high phytotelmata heterogeneity) in a restinga from south Brazil. We found that communities are composed by many common and few rare invertebrate species. Only a small proportion of community composition variation (10%) was related to the explanatory factors considered, with bromeliad species and the vegetation cover index (NDVI) around the plants being the most relevant. The results also show that, contrary to expectations, bromeliads with greater habitat heterogeneity (V. friburgensis) had less species richness. Applying rank abundance models, we found that the individual communities were similar to null models, without apparent structuring by species niche processes. However, when the communities were grouped by plant species (summing the abundance of several bromeliads), we found that the Zipf and Mandelbrot models, which consider patch dynamics of colonization and extinction by generalist and specialist species, were the most suitable models. Our results demonstrate that the bromeliad communities do not behave individually as isolated systems, but rather as habitat patches within a metacommunity, whith random patch dynamics of colonization and local extinctions in a set of bromeliads. Understanding this metacommunity dynamic helps us to understand the importance of conserving restinga areas to preserve Neotropical biodiversity.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020-11-26
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-02-01T12:38:29Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2021-02-01T12:38:29Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv NALLIS, Bruna Golinelli. Fatores que estruturam metacomunidades em fitotelmos de restinga. 2020. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2020. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/13796.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/13796
identifier_str_mv NALLIS, Bruna Golinelli. Fatores que estruturam metacomunidades em fitotelmos de restinga. 2020. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2020. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/13796.
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/13796
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv 16d5af69-f991-49e3-b1de-5866f0202ea7
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais - PPGERN
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/82dc730d-5cf0-48c9-b27d-29d21c16b949/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/de419b81-e2a7-4f9e-805f-f12a1b2e8767/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/aff7c55d-8fad-45ac-83e7-4feba8425374/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/70600587-a560-4047-9379-b09cfa998127/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/d5b3d157-1bee-4e62-b71b-b66b4261dc8b/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/1263a763-adde-4e88-b970-b3de1197fd67/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/3e25b5ae-64ae-498b-85df-e75ad35299ab/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 708255c3375ffb86a9debea85f41ea16
211e00cdfe1c2a07a295fd4cc488e4a2
e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34
dba9c90b75b0362bc1ff227630faf9bd
18c0b5b48b1e94f18a65dd69d0f19abc
2c7cdb5a0539b438aed79a9c2cbe50fe
f31448a10d83b042436c40700bee7659
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.sibi@ufscar.br
_version_ 1834469008180510720