Selection of Species with Soil Phytoremediation Potential After the Application of Protox-Inhibiting Herbicides

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: ALVES,C.
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: GALON,L., KAIZER,R.R., HOLZ,C.M., WINTER,F.L., BASSO,F.J.M., PERIN,G.F., FORTE,C.T.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Planta daninha (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582018000100273
Summary: ABSTRACT: The objective of this work was to evaluate the phytoremediation potential of summer-grown species planted in soils contaminated with the herbicides fomesafen or sulfentrazone. In a greenhouse, doses of fomesafen (0.0, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 kg ha-1) and or sulfentrazone (0.0, 0.3, 0.6 and 1.2 kg ha-1), were applied in the pre-emergence of brown hemp, millet, velvet bean and sorghum. On the field, the recommended doses of fomesafen (0.250 kg ha-1) and sulfentrazone (0.600 kg ha-1) were used in the pre-emergence of brown hemp, velvet bean and sorghum, plus a treatment without cultivation. These species, before planting canola (bioindicator species), were submitted to mowing and burndown. In greenhouse trials, velvet bean, millet and sorghum tolerated fomesafen up to the recommended dose; sulfentrazone caused the total death of these plants. In the field experiments, the cultivation of velvet bean and brown hemp, in general, were the best alternatives preceding canola, in soil contaminated with fomesafen, and mainly velvet bean for sulfentrazone-contaminated areas. The number of siliques per plant of canola and its productivity were superior when using velvet bean as cover crop for both herbicides, regardless of the adopted management. It is possible to conclude that brown hemp and velvet bean were the species that best phytoremediated soils treated with fomesafen or sulfentrazone, and could be used in the decontamination of soils treated with these herbicides, regardless of the adopted management.
id SBCPD-1_4bdeb2c4013c9646d80a5f58f3ddf643
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-83582018000100273
network_acronym_str SBCPD-1
network_name_str Planta daninha (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Selection of Species with Soil Phytoremediation Potential After the Application of Protox-Inhibiting HerbicidesBrassica oleracea var. oleiferaCrotalaria junceaMucuna pruriensABSTRACT: The objective of this work was to evaluate the phytoremediation potential of summer-grown species planted in soils contaminated with the herbicides fomesafen or sulfentrazone. In a greenhouse, doses of fomesafen (0.0, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 kg ha-1) and or sulfentrazone (0.0, 0.3, 0.6 and 1.2 kg ha-1), were applied in the pre-emergence of brown hemp, millet, velvet bean and sorghum. On the field, the recommended doses of fomesafen (0.250 kg ha-1) and sulfentrazone (0.600 kg ha-1) were used in the pre-emergence of brown hemp, velvet bean and sorghum, plus a treatment without cultivation. These species, before planting canola (bioindicator species), were submitted to mowing and burndown. In greenhouse trials, velvet bean, millet and sorghum tolerated fomesafen up to the recommended dose; sulfentrazone caused the total death of these plants. In the field experiments, the cultivation of velvet bean and brown hemp, in general, were the best alternatives preceding canola, in soil contaminated with fomesafen, and mainly velvet bean for sulfentrazone-contaminated areas. The number of siliques per plant of canola and its productivity were superior when using velvet bean as cover crop for both herbicides, regardless of the adopted management. It is possible to conclude that brown hemp and velvet bean were the species that best phytoremediated soils treated with fomesafen or sulfentrazone, and could be used in the decontamination of soils treated with these herbicides, regardless of the adopted management.Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas 2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582018000100273Planta Daninha v.36 2018reponame:Planta daninha (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)instacron:SBCPD10.1590/s0100-83582018360100074info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessALVES,C.GALON,L.KAIZER,R.R.HOLZ,C.M.WINTER,F.L.BASSO,F.J.M.PERIN,G.F.FORTE,C.T.eng2018-08-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-83582018000100273Revistahttp://revistas.cpd.ufv.br/pdaninhaweb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rpdaninha@gmail.com1806-96810100-8358opendoar:2018-08-30T00:00Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Selection of Species with Soil Phytoremediation Potential After the Application of Protox-Inhibiting Herbicides
title Selection of Species with Soil Phytoremediation Potential After the Application of Protox-Inhibiting Herbicides
spellingShingle Selection of Species with Soil Phytoremediation Potential After the Application of Protox-Inhibiting Herbicides
ALVES,C.
Brassica oleracea var. oleifera
Crotalaria juncea
Mucuna pruriens
title_short Selection of Species with Soil Phytoremediation Potential After the Application of Protox-Inhibiting Herbicides
title_full Selection of Species with Soil Phytoremediation Potential After the Application of Protox-Inhibiting Herbicides
title_fullStr Selection of Species with Soil Phytoremediation Potential After the Application of Protox-Inhibiting Herbicides
title_full_unstemmed Selection of Species with Soil Phytoremediation Potential After the Application of Protox-Inhibiting Herbicides
title_sort Selection of Species with Soil Phytoremediation Potential After the Application of Protox-Inhibiting Herbicides
author ALVES,C.
author_facet ALVES,C.
GALON,L.
KAIZER,R.R.
HOLZ,C.M.
WINTER,F.L.
BASSO,F.J.M.
PERIN,G.F.
FORTE,C.T.
author_role author
author2 GALON,L.
KAIZER,R.R.
HOLZ,C.M.
WINTER,F.L.
BASSO,F.J.M.
PERIN,G.F.
FORTE,C.T.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ALVES,C.
GALON,L.
KAIZER,R.R.
HOLZ,C.M.
WINTER,F.L.
BASSO,F.J.M.
PERIN,G.F.
FORTE,C.T.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Brassica oleracea var. oleifera
Crotalaria juncea
Mucuna pruriens
topic Brassica oleracea var. oleifera
Crotalaria juncea
Mucuna pruriens
description ABSTRACT: The objective of this work was to evaluate the phytoremediation potential of summer-grown species planted in soils contaminated with the herbicides fomesafen or sulfentrazone. In a greenhouse, doses of fomesafen (0.0, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 kg ha-1) and or sulfentrazone (0.0, 0.3, 0.6 and 1.2 kg ha-1), were applied in the pre-emergence of brown hemp, millet, velvet bean and sorghum. On the field, the recommended doses of fomesafen (0.250 kg ha-1) and sulfentrazone (0.600 kg ha-1) were used in the pre-emergence of brown hemp, velvet bean and sorghum, plus a treatment without cultivation. These species, before planting canola (bioindicator species), were submitted to mowing and burndown. In greenhouse trials, velvet bean, millet and sorghum tolerated fomesafen up to the recommended dose; sulfentrazone caused the total death of these plants. In the field experiments, the cultivation of velvet bean and brown hemp, in general, were the best alternatives preceding canola, in soil contaminated with fomesafen, and mainly velvet bean for sulfentrazone-contaminated areas. The number of siliques per plant of canola and its productivity were superior when using velvet bean as cover crop for both herbicides, regardless of the adopted management. It is possible to conclude that brown hemp and velvet bean were the species that best phytoremediated soils treated with fomesafen or sulfentrazone, and could be used in the decontamination of soils treated with these herbicides, regardless of the adopted management.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582018000100273
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582018000100273
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s0100-83582018360100074
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha v.36 2018
reponame:Planta daninha (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron:SBCPD
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron_str SBCPD
institution SBCPD
reponame_str Planta daninha (Online)
collection Planta daninha (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rpdaninha@gmail.com
_version_ 1752126496061784064