Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Other Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | eng |
| Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| Download full: | https://doi.org/10.19084/rca.38548 |
Summary: | Soil evaporation and crop transpiration are fundamental processes in modelling water transport, which is crucial for irrigation planning and scheduling. This study compares two methods to determine these components of crop evapotranspiration: (i) the straightforward single crop coefficient method, and (ii) the dual crop coefficient method, which may be more suitable for daily irrigation scheduling. Experimental data were collected from a spinach crop grown in pots between June and September 2022, using drip irrigation with three different soils (two sandy loams and one loam), inside a polytunnel, during two growth cycles. Meteorological data, plant height, and root depth were measured onsite. The particle size distribution was used to obtain soil hydraulic properties for dual crop coefficient method. Soil cover fraction was obtained with the Canopeo software. The results showed that crop evapotranspiration and its partitioning in evaporation and transpiration differ between the two methods. The single crop coefficient method resulted in overall lower crop evapotranspiration throughout the growth cycles, while attributing a relatively larger proportion of evapotranspiration to evaporation, particularly after the midpoint of the growth cycles. |
| id |
RCAP_f1cc33ff4ff920ea04e970ecd4e01b9d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/38548 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
| network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
| spelling |
Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficientsAvaliação da partição da evapotranspiração: comparação de dois métodos baseados no coeficiente cultural simples e coeficiente cultural dualGeralSoil evaporation and crop transpiration are fundamental processes in modelling water transport, which is crucial for irrigation planning and scheduling. This study compares two methods to determine these components of crop evapotranspiration: (i) the straightforward single crop coefficient method, and (ii) the dual crop coefficient method, which may be more suitable for daily irrigation scheduling. Experimental data were collected from a spinach crop grown in pots between June and September 2022, using drip irrigation with three different soils (two sandy loams and one loam), inside a polytunnel, during two growth cycles. Meteorological data, plant height, and root depth were measured onsite. The particle size distribution was used to obtain soil hydraulic properties for dual crop coefficient method. Soil cover fraction was obtained with the Canopeo software. The results showed that crop evapotranspiration and its partitioning in evaporation and transpiration differ between the two methods. The single crop coefficient method resulted in overall lower crop evapotranspiration throughout the growth cycles, while attributing a relatively larger proportion of evapotranspiration to evaporation, particularly after the midpoint of the growth cycles.A evaporação do solo e a transpiração das plantas são processos fundamentais na modelação do transporte de água, essencial para o planeamento da rega. Este estudo compara dois métodos para determinar esses componentes partindo da evapotranspiração cultural: (i) o coeficiente cultural simples e (ii) o coeficiente cultural dual, que pode ser mais adequado para a programação diária da irrigação. Foram usados dados experimentais de uma cultura de espinafre cultivada em vasos entre junho e setembro de 2022, usando rega por gota-a-gota em três tipos diferentes de solo (dois solos franco-arenosos e um solo franco), dentro de uma estufa, durante dois ciclos de crescimento. Os dados meteorológicos, a altura das plantas e profundidade das raízes foram medidos durante a experiência. As propriedades hidráulicas do solo para o método do coeficiente cultural dual foram estimadas por funções pedo-transferência com base na distribuição do tamanho das partículas do solo. As estimativas da fração coberta do solo foram obtidas com o software Canopeo. Os resultados mostraram que o método do coeficiente de cultural simples resultou numa menor transpiração ao longo dos ciclos de crescimento e atribuiu uma proporção relativamente maior da evapotranspiração à evaporação, especialmente após o meio dos ciclos de crescimento.Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal2025-01-08info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.19084/rca.38548eng2183-041X0871-018XAntunes, JoãoGonçalves, Maria ConceiçãoCastanheira, NádiaCouchinho, FilipaPaz, Ana Martainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-01-09T10:24:00Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/38548Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T19:38:13.637476Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients Avaliação da partição da evapotranspiração: comparação de dois métodos baseados no coeficiente cultural simples e coeficiente cultural dual |
| title |
Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients |
| spellingShingle |
Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients Antunes, João Geral |
| title_short |
Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients |
| title_full |
Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients |
| title_fullStr |
Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients |
| title_sort |
Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients |
| author |
Antunes, João |
| author_facet |
Antunes, João Gonçalves, Maria Conceição Castanheira, Nádia Couchinho, Filipa Paz, Ana Marta |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Gonçalves, Maria Conceição Castanheira, Nádia Couchinho, Filipa Paz, Ana Marta |
| author2_role |
author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Antunes, João Gonçalves, Maria Conceição Castanheira, Nádia Couchinho, Filipa Paz, Ana Marta |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Geral |
| topic |
Geral |
| description |
Soil evaporation and crop transpiration are fundamental processes in modelling water transport, which is crucial for irrigation planning and scheduling. This study compares two methods to determine these components of crop evapotranspiration: (i) the straightforward single crop coefficient method, and (ii) the dual crop coefficient method, which may be more suitable for daily irrigation scheduling. Experimental data were collected from a spinach crop grown in pots between June and September 2022, using drip irrigation with three different soils (two sandy loams and one loam), inside a polytunnel, during two growth cycles. Meteorological data, plant height, and root depth were measured onsite. The particle size distribution was used to obtain soil hydraulic properties for dual crop coefficient method. Soil cover fraction was obtained with the Canopeo software. The results showed that crop evapotranspiration and its partitioning in evaporation and transpiration differ between the two methods. The single crop coefficient method resulted in overall lower crop evapotranspiration throughout the growth cycles, while attributing a relatively larger proportion of evapotranspiration to evaporation, particularly after the midpoint of the growth cycles. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-01-08 |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.19084/rca.38548 |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.19084/rca.38548 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2183-041X 0871-018X |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
| instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| instacron_str |
RCAAP |
| institution |
RCAAP |
| reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
| _version_ |
1833598225269915648 |