Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Antunes, João
Publication Date: 2025
Other Authors: Gonçalves, Maria Conceição, Castanheira, Nádia, Couchinho, Filipa, Paz, Ana Marta
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://doi.org/10.19084/rca.38548
Summary: Soil evaporation and crop transpiration are fundamental processes in modelling water transport, which is crucial for irrigation planning and scheduling. This study compares two methods to determine these components of crop evapotranspiration: (i) the straightforward single crop coefficient method, and (ii) the dual crop coefficient method, which may be more suitable for daily irrigation scheduling. Experimental data were collected from a spinach crop grown in pots between June and September 2022, using drip irrigation with three different soils (two sandy loams and one loam), inside a polytunnel, during two growth cycles. Meteorological data, plant height, and root depth were measured onsite. The particle size distribution was used to obtain soil hydraulic properties for dual crop coefficient method. Soil cover fraction was obtained with the Canopeo software. The results showed that crop evapotranspiration and its partitioning in evaporation and transpiration differ between the two methods. The single crop coefficient method resulted in overall lower crop evapotranspiration throughout the growth cycles, while attributing a relatively larger proportion of evapotranspiration to evaporation, particularly after the midpoint of the growth cycles.
id RCAP_f1cc33ff4ff920ea04e970ecd4e01b9d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/38548
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficientsAvaliação da partição da evapotranspiração: comparação de dois métodos baseados no coeficiente cultural simples e coeficiente cultural dualGeralSoil evaporation and crop transpiration are fundamental processes in modelling water transport, which is crucial for irrigation planning and scheduling. This study compares two methods to determine these components of crop evapotranspiration: (i) the straightforward single crop coefficient method, and (ii) the dual crop coefficient method, which may be more suitable for daily irrigation scheduling. Experimental data were collected from a spinach crop grown in pots between June and September 2022, using drip irrigation with three different soils (two sandy loams and one loam), inside a polytunnel, during two growth cycles. Meteorological data, plant height, and root depth were measured onsite. The particle size distribution was used to obtain soil hydraulic properties for dual crop coefficient method. Soil cover fraction was obtained with the Canopeo software. The results showed that crop evapotranspiration and its partitioning in evaporation and transpiration differ between the two methods. The single crop coefficient method resulted in overall lower crop evapotranspiration throughout the growth cycles, while attributing a relatively larger proportion of evapotranspiration to evaporation, particularly after the midpoint of the growth cycles.A evaporação do solo e a transpiração das plantas são processos fundamentais na modelação do transporte de água, essencial para o planeamento da rega. Este estudo compara dois métodos para determinar esses componentes partindo da evapotranspiração cultural: (i) o coeficiente cultural simples e (ii) o coeficiente cultural dual, que pode ser mais adequado para a programação diária da irrigação. Foram usados dados experimentais de uma cultura de espinafre cultivada em vasos entre junho e setembro de 2022, usando rega por gota-a-gota em três tipos diferentes de solo (dois solos franco-arenosos e um solo franco), dentro de uma estufa, durante dois ciclos de crescimento. Os dados meteorológicos, a altura das plantas e profundidade das raízes foram medidos durante a experiência. As propriedades hidráulicas do solo para o método do coeficiente cultural dual foram estimadas por funções pedo-transferência com base na distribuição do tamanho das partículas do solo. As estimativas da fração coberta do solo foram obtidas com o software Canopeo. Os resultados mostraram que o método do coeficiente de cultural simples resultou numa menor transpiração ao longo dos ciclos de crescimento e atribuiu uma proporção relativamente maior da evapotranspiração à evaporação, especialmente após o meio dos ciclos de crescimento.Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal2025-01-08info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.19084/rca.38548eng2183-041X0871-018XAntunes, JoãoGonçalves, Maria ConceiçãoCastanheira, NádiaCouchinho, FilipaPaz, Ana Martainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-01-09T10:24:00Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/38548Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T19:38:13.637476Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients
Avaliação da partição da evapotranspiração: comparação de dois métodos baseados no coeficiente cultural simples e coeficiente cultural dual
title Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients
spellingShingle Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients
Antunes, João
Geral
title_short Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients
title_full Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients
title_fullStr Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients
title_full_unstemmed Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients
title_sort Comparing approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning: single vs. dual crop coefficients
author Antunes, João
author_facet Antunes, João
Gonçalves, Maria Conceição
Castanheira, Nádia
Couchinho, Filipa
Paz, Ana Marta
author_role author
author2 Gonçalves, Maria Conceição
Castanheira, Nádia
Couchinho, Filipa
Paz, Ana Marta
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Antunes, João
Gonçalves, Maria Conceição
Castanheira, Nádia
Couchinho, Filipa
Paz, Ana Marta
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Geral
topic Geral
description Soil evaporation and crop transpiration are fundamental processes in modelling water transport, which is crucial for irrigation planning and scheduling. This study compares two methods to determine these components of crop evapotranspiration: (i) the straightforward single crop coefficient method, and (ii) the dual crop coefficient method, which may be more suitable for daily irrigation scheduling. Experimental data were collected from a spinach crop grown in pots between June and September 2022, using drip irrigation with three different soils (two sandy loams and one loam), inside a polytunnel, during two growth cycles. Meteorological data, plant height, and root depth were measured onsite. The particle size distribution was used to obtain soil hydraulic properties for dual crop coefficient method. Soil cover fraction was obtained with the Canopeo software. The results showed that crop evapotranspiration and its partitioning in evaporation and transpiration differ between the two methods. The single crop coefficient method resulted in overall lower crop evapotranspiration throughout the growth cycles, while attributing a relatively larger proportion of evapotranspiration to evaporation, particularly after the midpoint of the growth cycles.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-01-08
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.19084/rca.38548
url https://doi.org/10.19084/rca.38548
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2183-041X
0871-018X
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833598225269915648