Clinical performance of an infliximab rapid quantification assay

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Magro, F.
Publication Date: 2017
Other Authors: Afonso, J., Lopes, S., Coelho, R., Gonçalves, R., Caldeira, P., Lago, P., Sousa, H., Ramos, J., Gonçalves, A., Ministro, P., Rosa, I., Meira, T., Andrade, P., Soares, J., Carvalho, D., Sousa, P., Vieira, A., Lopes, J., Dias, C., Geboes, K., Carneiro, F.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2235
Summary: BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-based algorithms can be used to guide infliximab (IFX) adjustments in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. This study aimed to explore a rapid IFX-quantification test from a clinical perspective. METHODS: This manuscript describes a prospective cohort study involving 110 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients on the maintenance phase of IFX. IFX trough levels were quantified using a rapid quantification assay and a commonly-used reference kit. RESULTS: Irrespective of the assay used to measure IFX, its through levels were statistically different between patients with and without endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic score = 0), as well as between patients stratified by their faecal calprotectin (FC) levels. Despite the fact that the two methods correlated well with each other [Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.843, p < 0.001; intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.857, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.791-0.903], there was a discernible systematic variation; values obtained with the reference kit were on average 2.62 units higher than those obtained with the rapid assay. Notwithstanding, 3 µg/ml was shown to be an acceptable cut-off to assess endoscopic status and inflammatory burden levels using both assays. The percentage of patients that had a positive outcome when the IFX concentration measured by the rapid assay ranked above 3 µg/ml was 88% both for a Mayo endoscopic score ⩽ 1 and for an FC concentration <250 µg/g. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, we concluded that using the rapid IFX assessment system with a 3 µg/ml threshold is a reliable alternative to the time-consuming enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in patients on the maintenance phase of IFX.
id RCAP_ea6abdeeda8e16fcc6c409fb6db17349
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chporto.pt:10400.16/2235
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Clinical performance of an infliximab rapid quantification assayinfliximabtherapeutic windowulcerative colitisBACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-based algorithms can be used to guide infliximab (IFX) adjustments in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. This study aimed to explore a rapid IFX-quantification test from a clinical perspective. METHODS: This manuscript describes a prospective cohort study involving 110 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients on the maintenance phase of IFX. IFX trough levels were quantified using a rapid quantification assay and a commonly-used reference kit. RESULTS: Irrespective of the assay used to measure IFX, its through levels were statistically different between patients with and without endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic score = 0), as well as between patients stratified by their faecal calprotectin (FC) levels. Despite the fact that the two methods correlated well with each other [Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.843, p < 0.001; intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.857, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.791-0.903], there was a discernible systematic variation; values obtained with the reference kit were on average 2.62 units higher than those obtained with the rapid assay. Notwithstanding, 3 µg/ml was shown to be an acceptable cut-off to assess endoscopic status and inflammatory burden levels using both assays. The percentage of patients that had a positive outcome when the IFX concentration measured by the rapid assay ranked above 3 µg/ml was 88% both for a Mayo endoscopic score ⩽ 1 and for an FC concentration <250 µg/g. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, we concluded that using the rapid IFX assessment system with a 3 µg/ml threshold is a reliable alternative to the time-consuming enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in patients on the maintenance phase of IFX.SAGE PublicationsRepositório Científico da Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo AntónioMagro, F.Afonso, J.Lopes, S.Coelho, R.Gonçalves, R.Caldeira, P.Lago, P.Sousa, H.Ramos, J.Gonçalves, A.Ministro, P.Rosa, I.Meira, T.Andrade, P.Soares, J.Carvalho, D.Sousa, P.Vieira, A.Lopes, J.Dias, C.Geboes, K.Carneiro, F.2018-10-25T14:40:48Z2017-092017-09-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2235eng1756-283X1756-284810.1177/1756283X17722916info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-02-26T10:06:37Zoai:repositorio.chporto.pt:10400.16/2235Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T21:18:42.116458Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clinical performance of an infliximab rapid quantification assay
title Clinical performance of an infliximab rapid quantification assay
spellingShingle Clinical performance of an infliximab rapid quantification assay
Magro, F.
infliximab
therapeutic window
ulcerative colitis
title_short Clinical performance of an infliximab rapid quantification assay
title_full Clinical performance of an infliximab rapid quantification assay
title_fullStr Clinical performance of an infliximab rapid quantification assay
title_full_unstemmed Clinical performance of an infliximab rapid quantification assay
title_sort Clinical performance of an infliximab rapid quantification assay
author Magro, F.
author_facet Magro, F.
Afonso, J.
Lopes, S.
Coelho, R.
Gonçalves, R.
Caldeira, P.
Lago, P.
Sousa, H.
Ramos, J.
Gonçalves, A.
Ministro, P.
Rosa, I.
Meira, T.
Andrade, P.
Soares, J.
Carvalho, D.
Sousa, P.
Vieira, A.
Lopes, J.
Dias, C.
Geboes, K.
Carneiro, F.
author_role author
author2 Afonso, J.
Lopes, S.
Coelho, R.
Gonçalves, R.
Caldeira, P.
Lago, P.
Sousa, H.
Ramos, J.
Gonçalves, A.
Ministro, P.
Rosa, I.
Meira, T.
Andrade, P.
Soares, J.
Carvalho, D.
Sousa, P.
Vieira, A.
Lopes, J.
Dias, C.
Geboes, K.
Carneiro, F.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico da Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Magro, F.
Afonso, J.
Lopes, S.
Coelho, R.
Gonçalves, R.
Caldeira, P.
Lago, P.
Sousa, H.
Ramos, J.
Gonçalves, A.
Ministro, P.
Rosa, I.
Meira, T.
Andrade, P.
Soares, J.
Carvalho, D.
Sousa, P.
Vieira, A.
Lopes, J.
Dias, C.
Geboes, K.
Carneiro, F.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv infliximab
therapeutic window
ulcerative colitis
topic infliximab
therapeutic window
ulcerative colitis
description BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-based algorithms can be used to guide infliximab (IFX) adjustments in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. This study aimed to explore a rapid IFX-quantification test from a clinical perspective. METHODS: This manuscript describes a prospective cohort study involving 110 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients on the maintenance phase of IFX. IFX trough levels were quantified using a rapid quantification assay and a commonly-used reference kit. RESULTS: Irrespective of the assay used to measure IFX, its through levels were statistically different between patients with and without endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic score = 0), as well as between patients stratified by their faecal calprotectin (FC) levels. Despite the fact that the two methods correlated well with each other [Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.843, p < 0.001; intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.857, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.791-0.903], there was a discernible systematic variation; values obtained with the reference kit were on average 2.62 units higher than those obtained with the rapid assay. Notwithstanding, 3 µg/ml was shown to be an acceptable cut-off to assess endoscopic status and inflammatory burden levels using both assays. The percentage of patients that had a positive outcome when the IFX concentration measured by the rapid assay ranked above 3 µg/ml was 88% both for a Mayo endoscopic score ⩽ 1 and for an FC concentration <250 µg/g. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, we concluded that using the rapid IFX assessment system with a 3 µg/ml threshold is a reliable alternative to the time-consuming enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in patients on the maintenance phase of IFX.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09
2017-09-01T00:00:00Z
2018-10-25T14:40:48Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2235
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2235
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1756-283X
1756-2848
10.1177/1756283X17722916
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE Publications
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE Publications
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833599210637754368