Sources of information on Medicines in Family Medicine
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2006 |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v22i6.10302 |
Summary: | Background: General Practice is a broad-spectrum medical speciality, requiring thorough information. Mostly, information on medicines is crucial. Aim: To study the information sources on drugs and therapeutics among General Practitioners of the Centre Region of Portugal; Methods: Cross-sectional study in a sample of General Practitioners in ambulatory primary care setting; 50% of the Health Centres of the Central Region of Portugal were invited to answer a simple questionnaire, after a random stratified process of choice of Health Centres in each geographical district. Results: A sample of 317 (17,6% of the total medical population and 27,4% of the randomised population) questionnaires were collected (male=133), from 51 Health Centres (87,9% of the randomised and 56,3% of all the Health Centres). The more quoted information sources on medicines were Journals (49,0%), Text Books (49,0%), Pharmaceutical Industry (44,4%), Simposium Terapêutico (42,4%), Prontuário Terapêutico (38,6%), the Resumo de Características dos Medicamentos (Medicines Characteristics Synopsis) (38,3%), Information from Congresses (37,7%), Information from an Expert Doctor (14,6%), Internet search (1,1%) and Information by a colleague from a Health Centre (6,6%). For 114 respondents (35,9%) there were no service meetings to discuss medical history records and therapeutics issues and for n=227 (72,7%) respondents there is no interest in discussing therapeutic issues with community pharmacists. Conclusions: These results emphasize the importance of written material as a source of medicines information, though independent and credible sources like the Portuguese Prontuário Terapêutico and the Resumo de Características dos Medicamentos are not cited as frequently as expected. There is need to perform medical meetings inside the Health Centre to discuss clinical matters and therapeutics. |
id |
RCAP_c8f8b904532f065a93381d00b5b30f62 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/10302 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Sources of information on Medicines in Family MedicineFontes de informação sobre medicamentos em Clínica Geral/Medicina Geral e FamiliarFarmacoepidemiologiaFarmacoeconomiaMedicamentosInformação sobre MedicamentosClínica GeralMedicinesMedicines InformationPharmacoeconomyPharmacoepidemiologyGeneral PracticeBackground: General Practice is a broad-spectrum medical speciality, requiring thorough information. Mostly, information on medicines is crucial. Aim: To study the information sources on drugs and therapeutics among General Practitioners of the Centre Region of Portugal; Methods: Cross-sectional study in a sample of General Practitioners in ambulatory primary care setting; 50% of the Health Centres of the Central Region of Portugal were invited to answer a simple questionnaire, after a random stratified process of choice of Health Centres in each geographical district. Results: A sample of 317 (17,6% of the total medical population and 27,4% of the randomised population) questionnaires were collected (male=133), from 51 Health Centres (87,9% of the randomised and 56,3% of all the Health Centres). The more quoted information sources on medicines were Journals (49,0%), Text Books (49,0%), Pharmaceutical Industry (44,4%), Simposium Terapêutico (42,4%), Prontuário Terapêutico (38,6%), the Resumo de Características dos Medicamentos (Medicines Characteristics Synopsis) (38,3%), Information from Congresses (37,7%), Information from an Expert Doctor (14,6%), Internet search (1,1%) and Information by a colleague from a Health Centre (6,6%). For 114 respondents (35,9%) there were no service meetings to discuss medical history records and therapeutics issues and for n=227 (72,7%) respondents there is no interest in discussing therapeutic issues with community pharmacists. Conclusions: These results emphasize the importance of written material as a source of medicines information, though independent and credible sources like the Portuguese Prontuário Terapêutico and the Resumo de Características dos Medicamentos are not cited as frequently as expected. There is need to perform medical meetings inside the Health Centre to discuss clinical matters and therapeutics.Objectivo: Conhecer as fontes de informação sobre medicamentos dos Médicos de Clínica Geral da Região Centro de Portugal. Metodologia: Estudo observacional, transversal, pela aplicação de questionário sobre o tema aos médicos de uma amostra representativa dos Centros de Saúde da ARS do Centro, obtida pela aleatorização de 50% dos Centros de Saúde de cada Sub-região de Saúde. Resultados: Responderam 51 Centros de Saúde (49,5% do universo dos Centros de Saúde), num total de médicos n=317 (17,7% do total). Citadas como mais vezes acedidas do que não acedidas, por ordem decrescente: Revistas (49%), Livros de Texto (45%), Indústria Farmacêutica (44,4%), Simposium Terapêutico (42,4%), Prontuário Terapêutico (38,6%), Resumo de Características dos Medicamentos (38,3%), Informação em Congresso (37,7%), informação por perito médico externo ao Centro de Saúde (14,6%), Pesquisa na Internet (11,1%) e Colega do Centro de Saúde (6,6%). Para n=114 não há reuniões no Centro de Saúde para debate da terapêutica e para n=227 (72,7%) não é sentida necessidade de regulares contactos com farmacêuticos para debate da terapêutica dos pacientes. Discussão: Apesar dos vieses como de voluntarismo, de memória e da altura de lançamento, obteve-se uma amostra representativa do Universo em estudo. Tal como em outros estudos, os médicos utilizam muito as fontes bibliográficas, apesar de dever ser discutida a qualidade de tais fontes. É importante verificar que o acesso aos instrumentos normalmente existentes no gabinete médico (Simposium Terapêutico, Prontuário e RCM) vêm na ordenação de maior acesso, em 4º, 5º e 6º lugares. O acesso a suportes informáticos via web parece ser muito pouco respondido. A discussão de casos clínicos, com acessória formação sobre medicamentos, em reuniões de Centro de Saúde, não é julgada existente para 35,9% dos inquiridos. Para aqueles que consideram existir tais reuniões de serviço, 36,9% julgam terem um carácter periódico, referindo 60,1% dos respondentes ter um carácter esporádico. Conclusões: Os resultados obtidos permitem concluir que: As fontes de informação isentas sobre medicamentos - Prontuário e RCM - não são as mais acedidas, devendo ser discutida a qualidade das revistas e livros de texto acedidos. Nos Centros de Saúde há necessidade de incrementar mais periódicas reuniões para debate/discussão da farmacoterapêutica. Não é julgado necessário o contacto com farmacêuticos para debate da terapêutica dos pacientes.Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar2006-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v22i6.10302https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v22i6.10302Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 22 No. 6 (2006): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 689-98Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 22 Núm. 6 (2006): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 689-98Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 22 N.º 6 (2006): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 689-982182-51812182-517310.32385/rpmgf.v22i6reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/10302https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/10302/10038Santiago, Luiz Miguelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-17T11:58:45Zoai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/10302Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T18:50:50.729034Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sources of information on Medicines in Family Medicine Fontes de informação sobre medicamentos em Clínica Geral/Medicina Geral e Familiar |
title |
Sources of information on Medicines in Family Medicine |
spellingShingle |
Sources of information on Medicines in Family Medicine Santiago, Luiz Miguel Farmacoepidemiologia Farmacoeconomia Medicamentos Informação sobre Medicamentos Clínica Geral Medicines Medicines Information Pharmacoeconomy Pharmacoepidemiology General Practice |
title_short |
Sources of information on Medicines in Family Medicine |
title_full |
Sources of information on Medicines in Family Medicine |
title_fullStr |
Sources of information on Medicines in Family Medicine |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sources of information on Medicines in Family Medicine |
title_sort |
Sources of information on Medicines in Family Medicine |
author |
Santiago, Luiz Miguel |
author_facet |
Santiago, Luiz Miguel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santiago, Luiz Miguel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Farmacoepidemiologia Farmacoeconomia Medicamentos Informação sobre Medicamentos Clínica Geral Medicines Medicines Information Pharmacoeconomy Pharmacoepidemiology General Practice |
topic |
Farmacoepidemiologia Farmacoeconomia Medicamentos Informação sobre Medicamentos Clínica Geral Medicines Medicines Information Pharmacoeconomy Pharmacoepidemiology General Practice |
description |
Background: General Practice is a broad-spectrum medical speciality, requiring thorough information. Mostly, information on medicines is crucial. Aim: To study the information sources on drugs and therapeutics among General Practitioners of the Centre Region of Portugal; Methods: Cross-sectional study in a sample of General Practitioners in ambulatory primary care setting; 50% of the Health Centres of the Central Region of Portugal were invited to answer a simple questionnaire, after a random stratified process of choice of Health Centres in each geographical district. Results: A sample of 317 (17,6% of the total medical population and 27,4% of the randomised population) questionnaires were collected (male=133), from 51 Health Centres (87,9% of the randomised and 56,3% of all the Health Centres). The more quoted information sources on medicines were Journals (49,0%), Text Books (49,0%), Pharmaceutical Industry (44,4%), Simposium Terapêutico (42,4%), Prontuário Terapêutico (38,6%), the Resumo de Características dos Medicamentos (Medicines Characteristics Synopsis) (38,3%), Information from Congresses (37,7%), Information from an Expert Doctor (14,6%), Internet search (1,1%) and Information by a colleague from a Health Centre (6,6%). For 114 respondents (35,9%) there were no service meetings to discuss medical history records and therapeutics issues and for n=227 (72,7%) respondents there is no interest in discussing therapeutic issues with community pharmacists. Conclusions: These results emphasize the importance of written material as a source of medicines information, though independent and credible sources like the Portuguese Prontuário Terapêutico and the Resumo de Características dos Medicamentos are not cited as frequently as expected. There is need to perform medical meetings inside the Health Centre to discuss clinical matters and therapeutics. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-11-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v22i6.10302 https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v22i6.10302 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v22i6.10302 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/10302 https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/10302/10038 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 22 No. 6 (2006): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 689-98 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 22 Núm. 6 (2006): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 689-98 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 22 N.º 6 (2006): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 689-98 2182-5181 2182-5173 10.32385/rpmgf.v22i6 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833597704855355392 |