Horizontal and Vertical Handheld Pointing Devices Comparison for Increasing Human Systems Integration at the Design Stage

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lourenço, Miguel
Publication Date: 2017
Other Authors: Pitarma, Rui, Coelho, Denis
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10314/3947
Summary: In addition to postural and biomechanical aspects related to usage of handheld pointing devices it is also important to perform usability assessment. The paper reports on an experimental study comparing two computer pointing devices, a standard horizontal PC mouse and a vertical device (for neutral pronation of the forearm), both commercially available. The standardized tasks implemented by software and performed by 20 experienced computer mouse users included pointing, dragging and steering. The usability parameters of effectiveness and efficiency were calculated and the participants subjectively assessed their discomfort, effort and ease of use in relation to each device in each task. Efficiency and effectiveness were higher for the horizontal device. Assessments of discomfort, effort and ease of use across the different tasks also supported the consideration of preference for the horizontal device in detriment of the vertical model. The results suggest that designing hybrid configurations may configure a better compromise.
id RCAP_c625e68a48544e280f8cf5f850ccec69
oai_identifier_str oai:bdigital.ipg.pt:10314/3947
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Horizontal and Vertical Handheld Pointing Devices Comparison for Increasing Human Systems Integration at the Design StageErgonomics · Human-systems Integration · Usability · Handheld Pointing DevicesIn addition to postural and biomechanical aspects related to usage of handheld pointing devices it is also important to perform usability assessment. The paper reports on an experimental study comparing two computer pointing devices, a standard horizontal PC mouse and a vertical device (for neutral pronation of the forearm), both commercially available. The standardized tasks implemented by software and performed by 20 experienced computer mouse users included pointing, dragging and steering. The usability parameters of effectiveness and efficiency were calculated and the participants subjectively assessed their discomfort, effort and ease of use in relation to each device in each task. Efficiency and effectiveness were higher for the horizontal device. Assessments of discomfort, effort and ease of use across the different tasks also supported the consideration of preference for the horizontal device in detriment of the vertical model. The results suggest that designing hybrid configurations may configure a better compromise.Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing - Advances in Human Factors and System Interactions2018-03-26T15:22:48Z2018-03-262017-01-01T00:00:00Zbook partinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://hdl.handle.net/10314/3947http://hdl.handle.net/10314/3947eng978-3-319-41955-8/2194-5357Lourenço, MiguelPitarma, RuiCoelho, Denisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-01-05T02:59:57Zoai:bdigital.ipg.pt:10314/3947Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T19:25:04.662601Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Horizontal and Vertical Handheld Pointing Devices Comparison for Increasing Human Systems Integration at the Design Stage
title Horizontal and Vertical Handheld Pointing Devices Comparison for Increasing Human Systems Integration at the Design Stage
spellingShingle Horizontal and Vertical Handheld Pointing Devices Comparison for Increasing Human Systems Integration at the Design Stage
Lourenço, Miguel
Ergonomics · Human-systems Integration · Usability · Handheld Pointing Devices
title_short Horizontal and Vertical Handheld Pointing Devices Comparison for Increasing Human Systems Integration at the Design Stage
title_full Horizontal and Vertical Handheld Pointing Devices Comparison for Increasing Human Systems Integration at the Design Stage
title_fullStr Horizontal and Vertical Handheld Pointing Devices Comparison for Increasing Human Systems Integration at the Design Stage
title_full_unstemmed Horizontal and Vertical Handheld Pointing Devices Comparison for Increasing Human Systems Integration at the Design Stage
title_sort Horizontal and Vertical Handheld Pointing Devices Comparison for Increasing Human Systems Integration at the Design Stage
author Lourenço, Miguel
author_facet Lourenço, Miguel
Pitarma, Rui
Coelho, Denis
author_role author
author2 Pitarma, Rui
Coelho, Denis
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lourenço, Miguel
Pitarma, Rui
Coelho, Denis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ergonomics · Human-systems Integration · Usability · Handheld Pointing Devices
topic Ergonomics · Human-systems Integration · Usability · Handheld Pointing Devices
description In addition to postural and biomechanical aspects related to usage of handheld pointing devices it is also important to perform usability assessment. The paper reports on an experimental study comparing two computer pointing devices, a standard horizontal PC mouse and a vertical device (for neutral pronation of the forearm), both commercially available. The standardized tasks implemented by software and performed by 20 experienced computer mouse users included pointing, dragging and steering. The usability parameters of effectiveness and efficiency were calculated and the participants subjectively assessed their discomfort, effort and ease of use in relation to each device in each task. Efficiency and effectiveness were higher for the horizontal device. Assessments of discomfort, effort and ease of use across the different tasks also supported the consideration of preference for the horizontal device in detriment of the vertical model. The results suggest that designing hybrid configurations may configure a better compromise.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
2018-03-26T15:22:48Z
2018-03-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv book part
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10314/3947
http://hdl.handle.net/10314/3947
url http://hdl.handle.net/10314/3947
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 978-3-319-41955-8/2194-5357
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing - Advances in Human Factors and System Interactions
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing - Advances in Human Factors and System Interactions
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833598083191013376