Modelling techniques : comparison between BPMN2.0 and IDEF (0&3)
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2018 |
| Format: | Master thesis |
| Language: | eng |
| Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/35815 |
Summary: | Dissertation presented as the partial requirement for obtaining a Master's degree in Information Management, specialization in Information Systems and Technologies Management |
| id |
RCAP_c5599870be16961e5687bdca8cd25d60 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/35815 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
| network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
| spelling |
Modelling techniques : comparison between BPMN2.0 and IDEF (0&3)Business Process ManagementBPMNIDEF0IDEF3Modelling TechniquesDissertation presented as the partial requirement for obtaining a Master's degree in Information Management, specialization in Information Systems and Technologies ManagementUnderstanding the full concepts of modelling techniques is what organizations lack these days which sometimes affects their decision in terms of choosing the tools to model and implement their processes. This, however, is a challenge as organisations tend to choose tools based on current trend or what their competitors used to achieve profit. Other researchers have done similar analysis comparing multiple modelling languages to identify the strength and weakness of each of the languages and to enlighten the users. This study analysed both BPMN2.0 and IDEF (IDEF0 and IDEF3) and built a comparative matrix showing the strengths and weakness of each technique. Design Science Research (DSR) was used for the methodology that involved carrying out surveys and drafting questionnaires. The results gotten from the survey was used to validate the matrix thereby suggesting recommendations with the hope of being useful to both academia and professionals. In doing so first, there was the need to establish an understanding of each tool which incorporates the framework and breakdown structure.Santos, Vitor Manuel Pereira Duarte dosRUNKelani, Khadija Temidayo2018-05-02T16:57:27Z2018-04-192018-04-19T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/35815TID:201906236enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-22T17:32:15Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/35815Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T17:03:19.887549Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Modelling techniques : comparison between BPMN2.0 and IDEF (0&3) |
| title |
Modelling techniques : comparison between BPMN2.0 and IDEF (0&3) |
| spellingShingle |
Modelling techniques : comparison between BPMN2.0 and IDEF (0&3) Kelani, Khadija Temidayo Business Process Management BPMN IDEF0 IDEF3 Modelling Techniques |
| title_short |
Modelling techniques : comparison between BPMN2.0 and IDEF (0&3) |
| title_full |
Modelling techniques : comparison between BPMN2.0 and IDEF (0&3) |
| title_fullStr |
Modelling techniques : comparison between BPMN2.0 and IDEF (0&3) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Modelling techniques : comparison between BPMN2.0 and IDEF (0&3) |
| title_sort |
Modelling techniques : comparison between BPMN2.0 and IDEF (0&3) |
| author |
Kelani, Khadija Temidayo |
| author_facet |
Kelani, Khadija Temidayo |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Vitor Manuel Pereira Duarte dos RUN |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kelani, Khadija Temidayo |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Business Process Management BPMN IDEF0 IDEF3 Modelling Techniques |
| topic |
Business Process Management BPMN IDEF0 IDEF3 Modelling Techniques |
| description |
Dissertation presented as the partial requirement for obtaining a Master's degree in Information Management, specialization in Information Systems and Technologies Management |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-05-02T16:57:27Z 2018-04-19 2018-04-19T00:00:00Z |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| format |
masterThesis |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/35815 TID:201906236 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/35815 |
| identifier_str_mv |
TID:201906236 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
| instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| instacron_str |
RCAAP |
| institution |
RCAAP |
| reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
| _version_ |
1833596401210097664 |