Repeat examinations in conventional radiology analysis

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Freitas, Artur
Publication Date: 2022
Other Authors: Pereira, José Manuel
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://doi.org/10.46885/roentgen.v3i1.72
Summary: Introduction: CR is the first-line method for diagnosing various pathologies and evaluating anatomy. The repetition of these exams is related to the non-fulfillment of good performance criteria that result in an absence/insufficiency of diagnostic value. The decrease in the repetition rate represents an important factor in the area of radiology and community health, contributing to the decrease in the dose received by patients and health professionals. The main objective of this study was to determine which conventional radiology exams are more likely to be repeated by radiology technicians, and their respective causes. Methods: An analytical, observational, and cross-sectional study was carried out. Data were collected by applying an online questionnaire survey to study participants. The study population consisted of Portuguese radiology technicians, graduated in radiology or medical imaging and radiotherapy, working in Portugal or abroad. For the study of associations between variables, the statistical tests of Pearson's correlation and chi-square of independence were used. Results: The sample consisted of 228 participants, of which 176 (77.2%) were female, with an average age of 33.93 (±10.37) years and average length of professional experience of 10.58 (±10.34) years. The knee examination (61%) was considered by the participants as the most likely to be repeated, followed by the chest (29.4%) and shoulder (24.6%). The participants mentioned incorrect positioning as the most common technical error, with the patient's non-cooperation being the main predictor of technical error. A weak negative correlation was observed between the length of experience of professionals and the frequency with which they repeat radiological exams. Conclusion: The exams performed on the knee, shoulder and chest are those with the highest repetition rate, and the most common error the patient's incorrect positioning. The factor that most contributes for the technician to make mistakes is the patient's non-cooperation. Participants emphasize the need to develop continuing training programs and the introduction of short breaks during shifts.
id RCAP_b968d031c06a28d7749088c79f4c046b
oai_identifier_str oai:roentgen.pt:article/72
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Repeat examinations in conventional radiology analysisAnálise de repetição de exames em radiologia convencionalConventional radiologyRadiological examsProfessional experienceQuality controlRepetition of radiological examsRadiologia Convencional;exames radiológicosexperiência profissionalcontrolo de qualidaderepetição de exames radiológicosIntroduction: CR is the first-line method for diagnosing various pathologies and evaluating anatomy. The repetition of these exams is related to the non-fulfillment of good performance criteria that result in an absence/insufficiency of diagnostic value. The decrease in the repetition rate represents an important factor in the area of radiology and community health, contributing to the decrease in the dose received by patients and health professionals. The main objective of this study was to determine which conventional radiology exams are more likely to be repeated by radiology technicians, and their respective causes. Methods: An analytical, observational, and cross-sectional study was carried out. Data were collected by applying an online questionnaire survey to study participants. The study population consisted of Portuguese radiology technicians, graduated in radiology or medical imaging and radiotherapy, working in Portugal or abroad. For the study of associations between variables, the statistical tests of Pearson's correlation and chi-square of independence were used. Results: The sample consisted of 228 participants, of which 176 (77.2%) were female, with an average age of 33.93 (±10.37) years and average length of professional experience of 10.58 (±10.34) years. The knee examination (61%) was considered by the participants as the most likely to be repeated, followed by the chest (29.4%) and shoulder (24.6%). The participants mentioned incorrect positioning as the most common technical error, with the patient's non-cooperation being the main predictor of technical error. A weak negative correlation was observed between the length of experience of professionals and the frequency with which they repeat radiological exams. Conclusion: The exams performed on the knee, shoulder and chest are those with the highest repetition rate, and the most common error the patient's incorrect positioning. The factor that most contributes for the technician to make mistakes is the patient's non-cooperation. Participants emphasize the need to develop continuing training programs and the introduction of short breaks during shifts.Introdução: A Radiologia Convencional é o método de primeira linha no diagnóstico de diversas patologias e avaliação da anatomia. A repetição de exames relaciona-se com o não cumprimento de critérios de boa realização que resultem em ausência/insuficiência de valor diagnóstico. A diminuição da taxa de repetição representa um fator importante na área da radiologia e da saúde comunitária, contribuindo para a diminuição da dose recebida pelos doentes e profissionais de saúde. O objetivo principal deste estudo foi determinar os exames de radiologia convencional mais suscetíveis de serem repetidos pelos técnicos de radiologia, e causas associadas. Métodos: Realizou-se um estudo analítico, observacional e transversal. Os dados foram colhidos através da aplicação online de um inquérito por questionário aos participantes no estudo. A população em estudo consistiu em técnicos de radiologia portugueses, licenciados em radiologia ou imagem médica e radioterapia, a exercer funções em Portugal ou no estrangeiro. Para o estudo de associações entre variáveis, utilizaram-se os testes estatísticos de Correlação de Pearson e Qui-quadrado da independência. Resultados: A amostra foi constituída por 228 participantes, dos quais 176 (77,2%) do sexo feminino, com média de idade de 33.93 (±10.37) anos e tempo médio de experiência profissional de 10.58 (±10.34) anos. O exame ao joelho (61%) foi considerado pelos participantes como o mais provável de ser repetido, seguido do tórax (29.4%) e ombro (24.6%). Os participantes apontaram como erro técnico mais comum o posicionamento incorreto, sendo a não colaboração do doente, o principal fator preditor de erro técnico. Observou-se uma correlação negativa de fraca amplitude entre o tempo de experiência dos profissionais e a frequência com que repetem exames radiológicos. Conclusão: Os exames realizados ao joelho, ombro e tórax, são aqueles que apresentam maior taxa de repetição, sendo o erro mais comum o posicionamento incorreto do doente. O fator que mais contribui para o erro é a não colaboração do doente. Os participantes realçam a necessidade do desenvolvimento de programas de formação contínua e a introdução de pequenas pausas durante os turnos.NUCLIRAD - Núcleo de Desenvolvimento dos Técnicos de Radiologia2022-01-20info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.46885/roentgen.v3i1.72https://doi.org/10.46885/roentgen.v3i1.72ROENTGEN-Scientific Journal of Radiological Techniques; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Research in Radiological Sciences; 22-37ROENTGEN-Revista Científica das Técnicas Radiológicas; v. 3 n. 1 (2022): A Investigação nas Ciências Radiológicas; 22-372184-7657reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://roentgen.pt/index.php/Principal/article/view/72https://roentgen.pt/index.php/Principal/article/view/72/59Direitos de Autor (c) 2022 ROENTGEN-Revista Científica das Técnicas Radiológicasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFreitas, ArturPereira, José Manuel2025-02-26T16:18:26Zoai:roentgen.pt:article/72Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T21:45:24.200178Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Repeat examinations in conventional radiology analysis
Análise de repetição de exames em radiologia convencional
title Repeat examinations in conventional radiology analysis
spellingShingle Repeat examinations in conventional radiology analysis
Freitas, Artur
Conventional radiology
Radiological exams
Professional experience
Quality control
Repetition of radiological exams
Radiologia Convencional;
exames radiológicos
experiência profissional
controlo de qualidade
repetição de exames radiológicos
title_short Repeat examinations in conventional radiology analysis
title_full Repeat examinations in conventional radiology analysis
title_fullStr Repeat examinations in conventional radiology analysis
title_full_unstemmed Repeat examinations in conventional radiology analysis
title_sort Repeat examinations in conventional radiology analysis
author Freitas, Artur
author_facet Freitas, Artur
Pereira, José Manuel
author_role author
author2 Pereira, José Manuel
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Freitas, Artur
Pereira, José Manuel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Conventional radiology
Radiological exams
Professional experience
Quality control
Repetition of radiological exams
Radiologia Convencional;
exames radiológicos
experiência profissional
controlo de qualidade
repetição de exames radiológicos
topic Conventional radiology
Radiological exams
Professional experience
Quality control
Repetition of radiological exams
Radiologia Convencional;
exames radiológicos
experiência profissional
controlo de qualidade
repetição de exames radiológicos
description Introduction: CR is the first-line method for diagnosing various pathologies and evaluating anatomy. The repetition of these exams is related to the non-fulfillment of good performance criteria that result in an absence/insufficiency of diagnostic value. The decrease in the repetition rate represents an important factor in the area of radiology and community health, contributing to the decrease in the dose received by patients and health professionals. The main objective of this study was to determine which conventional radiology exams are more likely to be repeated by radiology technicians, and their respective causes. Methods: An analytical, observational, and cross-sectional study was carried out. Data were collected by applying an online questionnaire survey to study participants. The study population consisted of Portuguese radiology technicians, graduated in radiology or medical imaging and radiotherapy, working in Portugal or abroad. For the study of associations between variables, the statistical tests of Pearson's correlation and chi-square of independence were used. Results: The sample consisted of 228 participants, of which 176 (77.2%) were female, with an average age of 33.93 (±10.37) years and average length of professional experience of 10.58 (±10.34) years. The knee examination (61%) was considered by the participants as the most likely to be repeated, followed by the chest (29.4%) and shoulder (24.6%). The participants mentioned incorrect positioning as the most common technical error, with the patient's non-cooperation being the main predictor of technical error. A weak negative correlation was observed between the length of experience of professionals and the frequency with which they repeat radiological exams. Conclusion: The exams performed on the knee, shoulder and chest are those with the highest repetition rate, and the most common error the patient's incorrect positioning. The factor that most contributes for the technician to make mistakes is the patient's non-cooperation. Participants emphasize the need to develop continuing training programs and the introduction of short breaks during shifts.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-20
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.46885/roentgen.v3i1.72
https://doi.org/10.46885/roentgen.v3i1.72
url https://doi.org/10.46885/roentgen.v3i1.72
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://roentgen.pt/index.php/Principal/article/view/72
https://roentgen.pt/index.php/Principal/article/view/72/59
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2022 ROENTGEN-Revista Científica das Técnicas Radiológicas
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2022 ROENTGEN-Revista Científica das Técnicas Radiológicas
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv NUCLIRAD - Núcleo de Desenvolvimento dos Técnicos de Radiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv NUCLIRAD - Núcleo de Desenvolvimento dos Técnicos de Radiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ROENTGEN-Scientific Journal of Radiological Techniques; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Research in Radiological Sciences; 22-37
ROENTGEN-Revista Científica das Técnicas Radiológicas; v. 3 n. 1 (2022): A Investigação nas Ciências Radiológicas; 22-37
2184-7657
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833599408841687040