Trust-based negotiation in multiagent systems: a systematic review
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2023 |
Other Authors: | , |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/89517 |
Summary: | In this work, we conducted a systematic review on trust-based negotiation in Multiagent Systems (MAS), through a bibliometric analysis over the past 25 years of research publications, on three of the most popular scientific databases (Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science). Our analysis reveals that this research topic is regaining interest, after some oscillating years, and the impact of its contributions is equivalent to other equally important research variants like ontology and argumentation (in a negotiation scenario). Discarding the human-to-agent trust challenges, we only focus on agent-to-agent trust concepts, and we performed an analysis of the different types of trust dimensions, using the findings and concerns of past review works, as we identify and select the dimensions that, in our opinion, have the most potential to lead the research advances on the topic of trust in MAS. Furthermore, we discuss the current challenges and open issues associated with those trust dimensions, and how current advancements in the literature could provide insights for the solution of those challenges, or even the finding of new research paths. |
id |
RCAP_ab348e61d86772ec9cb2f9dc4255f8d9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/89517 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Trust-based negotiation in multiagent systems: a systematic reviewMultiagent SystemsNegotiationTrustIn this work, we conducted a systematic review on trust-based negotiation in Multiagent Systems (MAS), through a bibliometric analysis over the past 25 years of research publications, on three of the most popular scientific databases (Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science). Our analysis reveals that this research topic is regaining interest, after some oscillating years, and the impact of its contributions is equivalent to other equally important research variants like ontology and argumentation (in a negotiation scenario). Discarding the human-to-agent trust challenges, we only focus on agent-to-agent trust concepts, and we performed an analysis of the different types of trust dimensions, using the findings and concerns of past review works, as we identify and select the dimensions that, in our opinion, have the most potential to lead the research advances on the topic of trust in MAS. Furthermore, we discuss the current challenges and open issues associated with those trust dimensions, and how current advancements in the literature could provide insights for the solution of those challenges, or even the finding of new research paths.This work has been supported by national funds through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology) through the Projects UIDB/04728/2020, UIDP/04728/2020, and the Ricardo Barbosa doctoral Grant with the reference UI/BD/154187/2022Springer NatureUniversidade do MinhoBarbosa, RicardoSantos, RicardoNovais, Paulo2023-072023-07-01T00:00:00Zconference paperinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/89517eng978-3-031-37592-71865-09291865-093710.1007/978-3-031-37593-4_11978-3-031-37593-4https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-37593-4_11info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-11T05:23:40Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/89517Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T15:17:05.945198Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Trust-based negotiation in multiagent systems: a systematic review |
title |
Trust-based negotiation in multiagent systems: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Trust-based negotiation in multiagent systems: a systematic review Barbosa, Ricardo Multiagent Systems Negotiation Trust |
title_short |
Trust-based negotiation in multiagent systems: a systematic review |
title_full |
Trust-based negotiation in multiagent systems: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Trust-based negotiation in multiagent systems: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Trust-based negotiation in multiagent systems: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Trust-based negotiation in multiagent systems: a systematic review |
author |
Barbosa, Ricardo |
author_facet |
Barbosa, Ricardo Santos, Ricardo Novais, Paulo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos, Ricardo Novais, Paulo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barbosa, Ricardo Santos, Ricardo Novais, Paulo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Multiagent Systems Negotiation Trust |
topic |
Multiagent Systems Negotiation Trust |
description |
In this work, we conducted a systematic review on trust-based negotiation in Multiagent Systems (MAS), through a bibliometric analysis over the past 25 years of research publications, on three of the most popular scientific databases (Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science). Our analysis reveals that this research topic is regaining interest, after some oscillating years, and the impact of its contributions is equivalent to other equally important research variants like ontology and argumentation (in a negotiation scenario). Discarding the human-to-agent trust challenges, we only focus on agent-to-agent trust concepts, and we performed an analysis of the different types of trust dimensions, using the findings and concerns of past review works, as we identify and select the dimensions that, in our opinion, have the most potential to lead the research advances on the topic of trust in MAS. Furthermore, we discuss the current challenges and open issues associated with those trust dimensions, and how current advancements in the literature could provide insights for the solution of those challenges, or even the finding of new research paths. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07 2023-07-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
conference paper |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/89517 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/89517 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
978-3-031-37592-7 1865-0929 1865-0937 10.1007/978-3-031-37593-4_11 978-3-031-37593-4 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-37593-4_11 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Nature |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Nature |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833595218848382976 |