Normative values of the Balance Evaluation System Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, Timed Up and Go Test and Usual Gait Speed in healthy older Portuguese people

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Sara Isabel Lebre de
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Marques, Alda, Santos, Joana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v33i2.12039
Resumo: Objective: This study aimed to establish age and gender-related normative values for the Balance Evaluation System Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and Usual Gait Speed (UGS) for Portuguese healthy older people aged 60 to 89 years. Design: An exploratory cross-sectional study was conducted. Local: Portugal. Population: Portuguese healthy older people aged 60 to 89 years. Methods: Participants were recruited from the community. Socio-demographic, anthropometric and general clinical data were collected with a structured questionnaire based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Balance was assessed with the BESTest, Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest, mobility with the TUG and gait speed with the six meters UGS. Normative scores were reported by age decades (60-69; 70-79 and 80-89 years old) and gender. Results: One hundred and thirteen healthy older people (75.8±8.9 years; 70.5% female) participated in this study. Mean scores for the BESTest (86.5±15.6; 82.6±14.5; 72.6±15.0), Mini-BESTest (22.4±6.3; 21.6±5.9; 16.2±6.2), Brief-BESTest (17.5±6.3; 16.0±6.0; 10.2±5.5) and UGS (122.3±46.8cm/s; 116.6±47.3cm/s; 73.8±32.6cm/s) decreased whereas TUG (8.9±2.8s; 9.5±4.0s; 16.8±5.3s) increased as age advanced. Female presented worse results than male. Mean scores of all measures were significantly different among age and gender groups (p
id RCAP_a3a79bed3d138f46e50d2115140203f1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/12039
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Normative values of the Balance Evaluation System Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, Timed Up and Go Test and Usual Gait Speed in healthy older Portuguese peopleValores normativos do Balance Evaluation System Test(BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, Timed Up and Go Test e Usual Gait Speed em pessoas idosas Portuguesas saudáveisNormative valuesBalanceMobilityGait speedOlder peoplePortugal.Valores normativosEquilíbrioMobilidadeVelocidade da marchaPessoas idosasPortugal.Objective: This study aimed to establish age and gender-related normative values for the Balance Evaluation System Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and Usual Gait Speed (UGS) for Portuguese healthy older people aged 60 to 89 years. Design: An exploratory cross-sectional study was conducted. Local: Portugal. Population: Portuguese healthy older people aged 60 to 89 years. Methods: Participants were recruited from the community. Socio-demographic, anthropometric and general clinical data were collected with a structured questionnaire based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Balance was assessed with the BESTest, Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest, mobility with the TUG and gait speed with the six meters UGS. Normative scores were reported by age decades (60-69; 70-79 and 80-89 years old) and gender. Results: One hundred and thirteen healthy older people (75.8±8.9 years; 70.5% female) participated in this study. Mean scores for the BESTest (86.5±15.6; 82.6±14.5; 72.6±15.0), Mini-BESTest (22.4±6.3; 21.6±5.9; 16.2±6.2), Brief-BESTest (17.5±6.3; 16.0±6.0; 10.2±5.5) and UGS (122.3±46.8cm/s; 116.6±47.3cm/s; 73.8±32.6cm/s) decreased whereas TUG (8.9±2.8s; 9.5±4.0s; 16.8±5.3s) increased as age advanced. Female presented worse results than male. Mean scores of all measures were significantly different among age and gender groups (pObjetivo: O objetivo deste estudo é estabelecer valores normativos relacionados com a idade e o género para o Balance Evaluation System Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, Timed Up and Go (TUG) test e Usual Gait Speed (UGS) para a população idosa Portuguesa, saudável, entre os 60 e os 89 anos. Tipo de estudo: Realizou-se um estudo transversal exploratório. Local: Portugal. População: Pessoas idosas Portuguesas, saudáveis, com idades entre os 60 e os 89 anos. Métodos: Os participantes foram recrutados na comunidade. Os dados sociodemográficos, antropométricos e de informação clínica geral foram recolhidos através de um questionário estruturado baseado na Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde. O equilíbrio foi avaliado com os BESTest, o Mini-BESTest e o Brief-BESTest, a mobilidade com a TUG e a velocidade da marcha com os seis metros da UGS. Os valores normativos foram reportados por décadas de idade (60-69; 70-79 e 80-89 anos) e por género. Resultados: Cento e treze pessoas idosas saudáveis (75,8±8,9 anos; 70,5% feminino) participaram neste estudo. A média do BESTest (86,5±15,6; 82,6±14,5; 72,6±15,0), Mini-BESTest (22,4±6,3; 21,6±5,9; 16,2±6,2), Brief-BESTest (17,5±6,3; 16,0±6,0; 10,2±5,5) e UGS (122,3±46,8cm/s; 116,6±47,3cm/s; 73,8±32,6cm/s) diminuíram, enquanto a média da TUG (8,9±2,8s; 9,5±4,0s; 16,8±5,3s) aumentou com o avançar da idade. O sexo feminino apresentou piores resultados. A média de todas as medidas foi significativamente diferente entre grupos de idade e género (pAssociação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar2017-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v33i2.12039https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v33i2.12039Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2017): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 106-116Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 33 Núm. 2 (2017): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 106-116Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 33 N.º 2 (2017): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 106-1162182-51812182-517310.32385/rpmgf.v33i2reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/12039https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/12039/11329Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida, Sara Isabel Lebre deMarques, AldaSantos, Joana2024-09-17T12:00:05Zoai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/12039Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T18:52:07.323151Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Normative values of the Balance Evaluation System Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, Timed Up and Go Test and Usual Gait Speed in healthy older Portuguese people
Valores normativos do Balance Evaluation System Test(BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, Timed Up and Go Test e Usual Gait Speed em pessoas idosas Portuguesas saudáveis
title Normative values of the Balance Evaluation System Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, Timed Up and Go Test and Usual Gait Speed in healthy older Portuguese people
spellingShingle Normative values of the Balance Evaluation System Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, Timed Up and Go Test and Usual Gait Speed in healthy older Portuguese people
Almeida, Sara Isabel Lebre de
Normative values
Balance
Mobility
Gait speed
Older people
Portugal.
Valores normativos
Equilíbrio
Mobilidade
Velocidade da marcha
Pessoas idosas
Portugal.
title_short Normative values of the Balance Evaluation System Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, Timed Up and Go Test and Usual Gait Speed in healthy older Portuguese people
title_full Normative values of the Balance Evaluation System Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, Timed Up and Go Test and Usual Gait Speed in healthy older Portuguese people
title_fullStr Normative values of the Balance Evaluation System Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, Timed Up and Go Test and Usual Gait Speed in healthy older Portuguese people
title_full_unstemmed Normative values of the Balance Evaluation System Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, Timed Up and Go Test and Usual Gait Speed in healthy older Portuguese people
title_sort Normative values of the Balance Evaluation System Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, Timed Up and Go Test and Usual Gait Speed in healthy older Portuguese people
author Almeida, Sara Isabel Lebre de
author_facet Almeida, Sara Isabel Lebre de
Marques, Alda
Santos, Joana
author_role author
author2 Marques, Alda
Santos, Joana
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida, Sara Isabel Lebre de
Marques, Alda
Santos, Joana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Normative values
Balance
Mobility
Gait speed
Older people
Portugal.
Valores normativos
Equilíbrio
Mobilidade
Velocidade da marcha
Pessoas idosas
Portugal.
topic Normative values
Balance
Mobility
Gait speed
Older people
Portugal.
Valores normativos
Equilíbrio
Mobilidade
Velocidade da marcha
Pessoas idosas
Portugal.
description Objective: This study aimed to establish age and gender-related normative values for the Balance Evaluation System Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and Usual Gait Speed (UGS) for Portuguese healthy older people aged 60 to 89 years. Design: An exploratory cross-sectional study was conducted. Local: Portugal. Population: Portuguese healthy older people aged 60 to 89 years. Methods: Participants were recruited from the community. Socio-demographic, anthropometric and general clinical data were collected with a structured questionnaire based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Balance was assessed with the BESTest, Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest, mobility with the TUG and gait speed with the six meters UGS. Normative scores were reported by age decades (60-69; 70-79 and 80-89 years old) and gender. Results: One hundred and thirteen healthy older people (75.8±8.9 years; 70.5% female) participated in this study. Mean scores for the BESTest (86.5±15.6; 82.6±14.5; 72.6±15.0), Mini-BESTest (22.4±6.3; 21.6±5.9; 16.2±6.2), Brief-BESTest (17.5±6.3; 16.0±6.0; 10.2±5.5) and UGS (122.3±46.8cm/s; 116.6±47.3cm/s; 73.8±32.6cm/s) decreased whereas TUG (8.9±2.8s; 9.5±4.0s; 16.8±5.3s) increased as age advanced. Female presented worse results than male. Mean scores of all measures were significantly different among age and gender groups (p
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v33i2.12039
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v33i2.12039
url https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v33i2.12039
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/12039
https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/12039/11329
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2017): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 106-116
Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 33 Núm. 2 (2017): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 106-116
Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 33 N.º 2 (2017): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 106-116
2182-5181
2182-5173
10.32385/rpmgf.v33i2
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833597719898226688

Registros relacionados