International classification for primary care (ICPC) coding by family medicine trainees

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pinto, Daniel
Publication Date: 2010
Other Authors: Corte-Real, Susana
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v26i4.10763
Summary: Objectives: To determine the ability of Portuguese doctors in the second half of their family medicine residency to code with the International Classification of Primary Care - revised version (ICPC-2). Study design: Cross-sectional. Setting: South of mainland Portugal, Azores e Madeira. Participants: Residents in the 29th and 30th courses of the Family Medicine Residency Coordination of South Portugal. Methods:A convenience sample of 100 residents was contacted by email, and asked to code three clinical vignettes written by the authors. The correct coding of reasons for encounter, diagnoses, and processes was determined by the authors with the help of a national ICPC-2 expert. We made a descriptive analysis of the proportion of correct answers, failures of classification, and most frequent errors. The answers of residents with and without previous training in ICPC-2 usage were compared. Results: The participation rate was 47.0%. 56.5% of reasons for encounter, 75.9% of diagnoses, and 48.8% of processes were correctly classified. Residents frequently coded in excess parts of the visit that are not, by the ICPC-2 definition, reasons for encounter; they frequently left out the code “health maintenance/preventive medicine” from problems and reasons for encounter; and, in processes, they seldom code the complete and partial medical examination. Residents who had previous training in ICPC-2 usage correctly coded more reasons for encounter (72.3% vs 55.1%) and problems (85.0% vs 74.8%). Conclusion: Residents appear to be better at coding diagnosis than reasons for encounter or processes. Errors in the coding of preventive activities and medical examination are frequent. Residents who had training in ICPC-2 usage had better results in coding of reasons for encounter and problems.
id RCAP_8c6b9206064f97bb2c9cae01cf674daf
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/10763
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling International classification for primary care (ICPC) coding by family medicine traineesCodificação com a classificação internacional de cuidados primários (ICPC) por internos de Medicina Geral e FamiliarClassificaçãoMedicina FamiliarInternato MédicoClassificationFamily PracticeResidencyObjectives: To determine the ability of Portuguese doctors in the second half of their family medicine residency to code with the International Classification of Primary Care - revised version (ICPC-2). Study design: Cross-sectional. Setting: South of mainland Portugal, Azores e Madeira. Participants: Residents in the 29th and 30th courses of the Family Medicine Residency Coordination of South Portugal. Methods:A convenience sample of 100 residents was contacted by email, and asked to code three clinical vignettes written by the authors. The correct coding of reasons for encounter, diagnoses, and processes was determined by the authors with the help of a national ICPC-2 expert. We made a descriptive analysis of the proportion of correct answers, failures of classification, and most frequent errors. The answers of residents with and without previous training in ICPC-2 usage were compared. Results: The participation rate was 47.0%. 56.5% of reasons for encounter, 75.9% of diagnoses, and 48.8% of processes were correctly classified. Residents frequently coded in excess parts of the visit that are not, by the ICPC-2 definition, reasons for encounter; they frequently left out the code “health maintenance/preventive medicine” from problems and reasons for encounter; and, in processes, they seldom code the complete and partial medical examination. Residents who had previous training in ICPC-2 usage correctly coded more reasons for encounter (72.3% vs 55.1%) and problems (85.0% vs 74.8%). Conclusion: Residents appear to be better at coding diagnosis than reasons for encounter or processes. Errors in the coding of preventive activities and medical examination are frequent. Residents who had training in ICPC-2 usage had better results in coding of reasons for encounter and problems.Objectivos: Determinar a capacidade de médicos na segunda metade do internato em Medicina Geral e Familiar em Portugal para codificar com a Classificação Internacional de Cuidados Primários - segunda edição (ICPC-2). Tipo de estudo: Transversal, analítico. Local: Zonal Sul de Portugal Continental, Açores e Madeira. População: Médicos internos dos 29.º e 30.º cursos da Coordenação de Internato de Medicina Geral e Familiar da Zona Sul. Métodos: Uma amostra de conveniência de 100 internos foi contactada por correio electrónico, sendo-lhes pedido que codificassem as descrições de três consultas elaboradas pelos autores. A codificação correcta dos motivos de consulta, problemas e procedimentos foi determinada pelos autores em colaboração com um perito nacional em ICPC-2. Procedeu-se a uma análise descritiva da proporção de respostas correctas, falhas de classificação e principais erros de codificação observados. Comparam-se as respostas dos internos com e sem formação prévia em ICPC-2. Resultados: A taxa de resposta foi de 47,0%. Foram classificados correctamente 56,5% dos motivos de consulta, 75,9% dos problemas e 48,8% dos procedimentos. Verificou-se que os internos codificaram frequentemente em excesso situações abordadas na consulta que não constituem motivos segundo a definição da ICPC-2; omitiram frequentemente o código «medicina preventiva/manutenção da saúde» dos problemas e motivos de consulta; e, nos procedimentos, raramente foram codificados os exames médicos completo ou parcial realizados na consulta. Os internos que fizeram formação codificaram correctamente mais motivos de consulta (72,3% vs 55,1%) e problemas (85,0% vs 74,8%). Conclusões: Os internos parecem ser melhores na codificação de problemas do que nos motivos de consulta ou procedimentos. São frequentes erros relacionados com a codificação de actividades preventivas e o exame médico. Os internos que fizeram formação específica na utilização da ICPC-2 tiveram melhores resultados na codificação de motivos de consulta e problemas.Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar2010-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v26i4.10763https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v26i4.10763Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 26 No. 4 (2010): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 370-82Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 26 Núm. 4 (2010): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 370-82Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 26 N.º 4 (2010): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 370-822182-51812182-517310.32385/rpmgf.v26i4reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/10763https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/10763/10499Pinto, DanielCorte-Real, Susanainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-17T11:59:18Zoai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/10763Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T18:51:34.113513Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv International classification for primary care (ICPC) coding by family medicine trainees
Codificação com a classificação internacional de cuidados primários (ICPC) por internos de Medicina Geral e Familiar
title International classification for primary care (ICPC) coding by family medicine trainees
spellingShingle International classification for primary care (ICPC) coding by family medicine trainees
Pinto, Daniel
Classificação
Medicina Familiar
Internato Médico
Classification
Family Practice
Residency
title_short International classification for primary care (ICPC) coding by family medicine trainees
title_full International classification for primary care (ICPC) coding by family medicine trainees
title_fullStr International classification for primary care (ICPC) coding by family medicine trainees
title_full_unstemmed International classification for primary care (ICPC) coding by family medicine trainees
title_sort International classification for primary care (ICPC) coding by family medicine trainees
author Pinto, Daniel
author_facet Pinto, Daniel
Corte-Real, Susana
author_role author
author2 Corte-Real, Susana
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinto, Daniel
Corte-Real, Susana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Classificação
Medicina Familiar
Internato Médico
Classification
Family Practice
Residency
topic Classificação
Medicina Familiar
Internato Médico
Classification
Family Practice
Residency
description Objectives: To determine the ability of Portuguese doctors in the second half of their family medicine residency to code with the International Classification of Primary Care - revised version (ICPC-2). Study design: Cross-sectional. Setting: South of mainland Portugal, Azores e Madeira. Participants: Residents in the 29th and 30th courses of the Family Medicine Residency Coordination of South Portugal. Methods:A convenience sample of 100 residents was contacted by email, and asked to code three clinical vignettes written by the authors. The correct coding of reasons for encounter, diagnoses, and processes was determined by the authors with the help of a national ICPC-2 expert. We made a descriptive analysis of the proportion of correct answers, failures of classification, and most frequent errors. The answers of residents with and without previous training in ICPC-2 usage were compared. Results: The participation rate was 47.0%. 56.5% of reasons for encounter, 75.9% of diagnoses, and 48.8% of processes were correctly classified. Residents frequently coded in excess parts of the visit that are not, by the ICPC-2 definition, reasons for encounter; they frequently left out the code “health maintenance/preventive medicine” from problems and reasons for encounter; and, in processes, they seldom code the complete and partial medical examination. Residents who had previous training in ICPC-2 usage correctly coded more reasons for encounter (72.3% vs 55.1%) and problems (85.0% vs 74.8%). Conclusion: Residents appear to be better at coding diagnosis than reasons for encounter or processes. Errors in the coding of preventive activities and medical examination are frequent. Residents who had training in ICPC-2 usage had better results in coding of reasons for encounter and problems.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-07-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v26i4.10763
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v26i4.10763
url https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v26i4.10763
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/10763
https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/10763/10499
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 26 No. 4 (2010): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 370-82
Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 26 Núm. 4 (2010): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 370-82
Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 26 N.º 4 (2010): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral; 370-82
2182-5181
2182-5173
10.32385/rpmgf.v26i4
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833597710710603776