Esg ratings divergence & developing a proprietary Esg scorecard
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2020 |
Format: | Master thesis |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/105987 |
Summary: | This paper analyses the divergence in Environmental, Social, and Governance(ESG) ratings between two leading providers: Sustainalytics and RobecoSAM.It finds that there are significant divergences in ratings between the two providers and that the rating correlation between them is much lower when compared to the correlation observed between credit rating agency scores. This applies to both their composite ESG ratings and their unidimensional Environmental, Social, and Governance scores. Additionally, this paper attempts to build a transparent, reliable, and cost-effective proprietary ESG scorecard by using a limited amount of data points, however the resulting scores are weakly correlated to the agency ratings. |
id |
RCAP_8ace98ac313ca7af89bb2d6715b71232 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/105987 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Esg ratings divergence & developing a proprietary Esg scorecardESG ratingsESG rating agenciesProprietary ESG scorecardsESG scoringSustainable investmentsEnvironmentalSocialGovernance performanceCorporate sustainabilityDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoThis paper analyses the divergence in Environmental, Social, and Governance(ESG) ratings between two leading providers: Sustainalytics and RobecoSAM.It finds that there are significant divergences in ratings between the two providers and that the rating correlation between them is much lower when compared to the correlation observed between credit rating agency scores. This applies to both their composite ESG ratings and their unidimensional Environmental, Social, and Governance scores. Additionally, this paper attempts to build a transparent, reliable, and cost-effective proprietary ESG scorecard by using a limited amount of data points, however the resulting scores are weakly correlated to the agency ratings.Ribeiro, Gonçalo SommerRUNBonnike, Lucas Sander2023-01-03T01:30:21Z2020-01-242020-01-032020-01-24T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/105987TID:202494730enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-22T17:48:19Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/105987Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T17:19:34.254685Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Esg ratings divergence & developing a proprietary Esg scorecard |
title |
Esg ratings divergence & developing a proprietary Esg scorecard |
spellingShingle |
Esg ratings divergence & developing a proprietary Esg scorecard Bonnike, Lucas Sander ESG ratings ESG rating agencies Proprietary ESG scorecards ESG scoring Sustainable investments Environmental Social Governance performance Corporate sustainability Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão |
title_short |
Esg ratings divergence & developing a proprietary Esg scorecard |
title_full |
Esg ratings divergence & developing a proprietary Esg scorecard |
title_fullStr |
Esg ratings divergence & developing a proprietary Esg scorecard |
title_full_unstemmed |
Esg ratings divergence & developing a proprietary Esg scorecard |
title_sort |
Esg ratings divergence & developing a proprietary Esg scorecard |
author |
Bonnike, Lucas Sander |
author_facet |
Bonnike, Lucas Sander |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Gonçalo Sommer RUN |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bonnike, Lucas Sander |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
ESG ratings ESG rating agencies Proprietary ESG scorecards ESG scoring Sustainable investments Environmental Social Governance performance Corporate sustainability Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão |
topic |
ESG ratings ESG rating agencies Proprietary ESG scorecards ESG scoring Sustainable investments Environmental Social Governance performance Corporate sustainability Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão |
description |
This paper analyses the divergence in Environmental, Social, and Governance(ESG) ratings between two leading providers: Sustainalytics and RobecoSAM.It finds that there are significant divergences in ratings between the two providers and that the rating correlation between them is much lower when compared to the correlation observed between credit rating agency scores. This applies to both their composite ESG ratings and their unidimensional Environmental, Social, and Governance scores. Additionally, this paper attempts to build a transparent, reliable, and cost-effective proprietary ESG scorecard by using a limited amount of data points, however the resulting scores are weakly correlated to the agency ratings. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-24 2020-01-03 2020-01-24T00:00:00Z 2023-01-03T01:30:21Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/105987 TID:202494730 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/105987 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:202494730 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833596612164714496 |