On the practical use of weld improvement methods
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2001 |
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | eng |
| Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| Download full: | https://hdl.handle.net/10316/10759 https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.49 |
Summary: | Many laboratory studies have shown the beneficial effects of weld improvement methods on the fatigue strength of welded details. However, no structural codes systematically include weld improvement methods in detail classification. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the possibilities of using these methods in practice on either new or existing structures. This paper provides the reader with practical rules for designing and computing the fatigue strength of improved welded joints. A computation method based on the concept of effective stress range is introduced to model the effects of peening improvement methods on fatigue strength. For the most popular improvement methods, the fatigue strength of improved details can be deduced from the extensive existing database of full-scale test results. However, for non-classified details, or when fabrication and improvement processes require validation, testing of the improved details is the only method available to guarantee the fatigue strength of a particular detail. In this paper a recent application of validation through testing in the case of longitudinal attachments is described. |
| id |
RCAP_822017dfaf34c4e7df197e1f09863bdb |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/10759 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
| network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
| spelling |
On the practical use of weld improvement methodsFatigueWelded structuresImprovement methodsGrindingPeeningLarge-scale testingFabricationMany laboratory studies have shown the beneficial effects of weld improvement methods on the fatigue strength of welded details. However, no structural codes systematically include weld improvement methods in detail classification. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the possibilities of using these methods in practice on either new or existing structures. This paper provides the reader with practical rules for designing and computing the fatigue strength of improved welded joints. A computation method based on the concept of effective stress range is introduced to model the effects of peening improvement methods on fatigue strength. For the most popular improvement methods, the fatigue strength of improved details can be deduced from the extensive existing database of full-scale test results. However, for non-classified details, or when fabrication and improvement processes require validation, testing of the improved details is the only method available to guarantee the fatigue strength of a particular detail. In this paper a recent application of validation through testing in the case of longitudinal attachments is described.John Wiley & Sons2001-08-13info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/10759https://hdl.handle.net/10316/10759https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.49engProgress in Structural Engineering and Materials. 3:1 (2001) 95-1051365-0556Nussbaumer, A.Imhof, D.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2019-05-29T00:45:18Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/10759Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T05:17:45.131836Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
On the practical use of weld improvement methods |
| title |
On the practical use of weld improvement methods |
| spellingShingle |
On the practical use of weld improvement methods Nussbaumer, A. Fatigue Welded structures Improvement methods Grinding Peening Large-scale testing Fabrication |
| title_short |
On the practical use of weld improvement methods |
| title_full |
On the practical use of weld improvement methods |
| title_fullStr |
On the practical use of weld improvement methods |
| title_full_unstemmed |
On the practical use of weld improvement methods |
| title_sort |
On the practical use of weld improvement methods |
| author |
Nussbaumer, A. |
| author_facet |
Nussbaumer, A. Imhof, D. |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Imhof, D. |
| author2_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nussbaumer, A. Imhof, D. |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fatigue Welded structures Improvement methods Grinding Peening Large-scale testing Fabrication |
| topic |
Fatigue Welded structures Improvement methods Grinding Peening Large-scale testing Fabrication |
| description |
Many laboratory studies have shown the beneficial effects of weld improvement methods on the fatigue strength of welded details. However, no structural codes systematically include weld improvement methods in detail classification. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the possibilities of using these methods in practice on either new or existing structures. This paper provides the reader with practical rules for designing and computing the fatigue strength of improved welded joints. A computation method based on the concept of effective stress range is introduced to model the effects of peening improvement methods on fatigue strength. For the most popular improvement methods, the fatigue strength of improved details can be deduced from the extensive existing database of full-scale test results. However, for non-classified details, or when fabrication and improvement processes require validation, testing of the improved details is the only method available to guarantee the fatigue strength of a particular detail. In this paper a recent application of validation through testing in the case of longitudinal attachments is described. |
| publishDate |
2001 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2001-08-13 |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/10759 https://hdl.handle.net/10316/10759 https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.49 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/10759 https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.49 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials. 3:1 (2001) 95-105 1365-0556 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
John Wiley & Sons |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
John Wiley & Sons |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
| instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| instacron_str |
RCAAP |
| institution |
RCAAP |
| reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
| _version_ |
1833602311199391745 |