Bone Metastases Detection in Patients with Breast Cancer: Does Bone Scintigraphy Add Information to PET/CT?

• Main Author: Santos, Joana Cristo
• Publication Date: 2023
• Other Authors: Henriques Abreu, Miguel, Santos, Miriam Seoane, Duarte, Hugo, Alpoim, Tiago, Próspero, Inês, Sousa, Susana, Abreu, Pedro Henriques
• Format: Article
• Language: eng
• Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
• Download full: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/112223; https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyad087
• topic: Humans; Female; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Positron-Emission Tomography; Prospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Breast Neoplasms; Bone Neoplasms

Background: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has become in recent years a tool for breast cancer (BC) staging. However, its accuracy to detect bone metastases is classically considered inferior to bone scintigraphy (BS). The purpose of this work is to compare the effectiveness of bone metastases detection between PET/CT and BS. Materials and Methods: Prospective study of 410 female patients treated in a Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2014 and 2020 that performed PET/CT and BS for staging purposes. The image analysis was performed by 2 senior nuclear medicine physicians. The comparison was performed based on accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity on a patient and anatomical region level and was assessed using McNemar’s Test. An average ROC was calculated for the anatomical region analysis. Results: PET/CT presented higher values of accuracy and sensitivity (98.0% and 93.83%), surpassing BS (95.61% and 81.48%) in detecting bone disease. There was a significant difference in favor of PET/CT (sensitivity 93.83% vs. 81.48%), however, there is no significant difference in eliminating false positives (specificity 99.09% vs. 99.09%). PET/CT presented the highest accuracy and sensitivity values for most of the bone segments, only surpassed by BS for the cranium. There was a significant difference in favor of PET/CT in the upper limb, spine, thorax (sternum) and lower limb (pelvis and sacrum), and in favor of BS in the cranium. The ROC showed that PET/CT has a higher sensitivity and consistency across the bone segments. Conclusion: With the correct imaging protocol, PET/CT does not require BS for patients with BC staging.