Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Newton, Caroline
Publication Date: 2022
Other Authors: Rocco, Roberto
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i1.4838
Summary: In Paraisópolis, a slum in São Paulo (Brazil) housing over 100.000 inhabitants, the Covid crisis seemed to have less of a death toll (0,0217%) than in other areas of the city (an average of 0,0652% as of May 2020); or at least it did at first. The sense of community in the area is strong, leading to many community initiatives and organisations to rise to the challenge of combating the pandemic with little help from the authorities. The community’s initial efficient response to the Covid crisis relied heavily on self‐reliance and self‐organization to mobilise common resources. Despite their later failure in containing the virus, the community’s response to the pandemic is exemplary of a well‐known phenomenon: how communities are able to mobilise the commons to create general welfare. The commons concept is used in this contribution to help us better understand slum governance and the power and limitations of community reliance. At the same time, we aim to refine our understanding of the commons as a contentious category rooted in agonistic relationships instead of the romanticised leftist social imaginary that views the commons as purely anti‐capitalist. Thus, we explicitly argue for a view of the commons and commoning that transcends the narrow “Leftist imaginary” of the commons as egalitarian, inclusive, anti‐capitalist, horizontal, and as expressions of sharing (and caring), and instead views the commons as embedded in everyday realities, where commoning practices emerge as practises that support the reproduction of (social) life.
id RCAP_6c9cfba6876fcee7f3da4c2f30c71535
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4838
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the Citycommons and commoning; community reliance; Covid‐19 responses; grassroots and the state; informal settlementsIn Paraisópolis, a slum in São Paulo (Brazil) housing over 100.000 inhabitants, the Covid crisis seemed to have less of a death toll (0,0217%) than in other areas of the city (an average of 0,0652% as of May 2020); or at least it did at first. The sense of community in the area is strong, leading to many community initiatives and organisations to rise to the challenge of combating the pandemic with little help from the authorities. The community’s initial efficient response to the Covid crisis relied heavily on self‐reliance and self‐organization to mobilise common resources. Despite their later failure in containing the virus, the community’s response to the pandemic is exemplary of a well‐known phenomenon: how communities are able to mobilise the commons to create general welfare. The commons concept is used in this contribution to help us better understand slum governance and the power and limitations of community reliance. At the same time, we aim to refine our understanding of the commons as a contentious category rooted in agonistic relationships instead of the romanticised leftist social imaginary that views the commons as purely anti‐capitalist. Thus, we explicitly argue for a view of the commons and commoning that transcends the narrow “Leftist imaginary” of the commons as egalitarian, inclusive, anti‐capitalist, horizontal, and as expressions of sharing (and caring), and instead views the commons as embedded in everyday realities, where commoning practices emerge as practises that support the reproduction of (social) life.Cogitatio2022-02-22info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i1.4838oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4838Social Inclusion; Vol 10, No 1 (2022): The Politics and Aesthetics of the Urban Commons: Navigating the Gaze of the City, the State, the Market; 91-1022183-2803reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4838https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i1.4838https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4838/4838Copyright (c) 2022 Caroline Newton, Roberto Roccoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNewton, CarolineRocco, Roberto2022-12-20T11:00:11Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4838Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T10:43:50.707156Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City
title Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City
spellingShingle Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City
Newton, Caroline
commons and commoning; community reliance; Covid‐19 responses; grassroots and the state; informal settlements
title_short Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City
title_full Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City
title_fullStr Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City
title_full_unstemmed Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City
title_sort Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City
author Newton, Caroline
author_facet Newton, Caroline
Rocco, Roberto
author_role author
author2 Rocco, Roberto
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Newton, Caroline
Rocco, Roberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv commons and commoning; community reliance; Covid‐19 responses; grassroots and the state; informal settlements
topic commons and commoning; community reliance; Covid‐19 responses; grassroots and the state; informal settlements
description In Paraisópolis, a slum in São Paulo (Brazil) housing over 100.000 inhabitants, the Covid crisis seemed to have less of a death toll (0,0217%) than in other areas of the city (an average of 0,0652% as of May 2020); or at least it did at first. The sense of community in the area is strong, leading to many community initiatives and organisations to rise to the challenge of combating the pandemic with little help from the authorities. The community’s initial efficient response to the Covid crisis relied heavily on self‐reliance and self‐organization to mobilise common resources. Despite their later failure in containing the virus, the community’s response to the pandemic is exemplary of a well‐known phenomenon: how communities are able to mobilise the commons to create general welfare. The commons concept is used in this contribution to help us better understand slum governance and the power and limitations of community reliance. At the same time, we aim to refine our understanding of the commons as a contentious category rooted in agonistic relationships instead of the romanticised leftist social imaginary that views the commons as purely anti‐capitalist. Thus, we explicitly argue for a view of the commons and commoning that transcends the narrow “Leftist imaginary” of the commons as egalitarian, inclusive, anti‐capitalist, horizontal, and as expressions of sharing (and caring), and instead views the commons as embedded in everyday realities, where commoning practices emerge as practises that support the reproduction of (social) life.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-22
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i1.4838
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4838
url https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i1.4838
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4838
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4838
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i1.4838
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4838/4838
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Caroline Newton, Roberto Rocco
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Caroline Newton, Roberto Rocco
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Social Inclusion; Vol 10, No 1 (2022): The Politics and Aesthetics of the Urban Commons: Navigating the Gaze of the City, the State, the Market; 91-102
2183-2803
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833591171835756544