Exploring ethical principles amongst practicing community pharmacists in Portugal: any reasons for concern?
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2023 |
Other Authors: | , |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/16752 |
Summary: | Pharmacists facing ethical dilemmas have shown weaknesses in principled reasoning and disclosure. The chapter describes research on Portuguese community pharmacists' moral reasoning and narrative ethics. A cross-sectional survey comprising vignettes with practice ethical dilemmas, their possible justifications, and an open box for textual accounts was used as the research tool. More than 270 pharmacists replied, primarily young (<35 years old) female practitioners and 75% were involved in direct contact with patients. At least 50% of the sample showed compliance with the expected ethical-based decisions, except for the non-maleficence principle (10.9%); although receiving the highest proportion of the corresponding justification (30.3%), no open accounts or narratives were registered. The present findings suggest ethical passivity associated with decision-making in practice and a potential conflict between the clinical and the business roles. Explicit ethical norms for practice guidance and additional moral reasoning and narrative training are suggested. |
id |
RCAP_6711c61f89a63f130446629b205f5e55 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ipl.pt:10400.21/16752 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Exploring ethical principles amongst practicing community pharmacists in Portugal: any reasons for concern?EthicsDilemmasMoral reasoningPharmacistPortugalPharmacists facing ethical dilemmas have shown weaknesses in principled reasoning and disclosure. The chapter describes research on Portuguese community pharmacists' moral reasoning and narrative ethics. A cross-sectional survey comprising vignettes with practice ethical dilemmas, their possible justifications, and an open box for textual accounts was used as the research tool. More than 270 pharmacists replied, primarily young (<35 years old) female practitioners and 75% were involved in direct contact with patients. At least 50% of the sample showed compliance with the expected ethical-based decisions, except for the non-maleficence principle (10.9%); although receiving the highest proportion of the corresponding justification (30.3%), no open accounts or narratives were registered. The present findings suggest ethical passivity associated with decision-making in practice and a potential conflict between the clinical and the business roles. Explicit ethical norms for practice guidance and additional moral reasoning and narrative training are suggested.IGI GlobalRCIPLCavaco, Afonso MiguelGrilo, AnaBarros, Luisa20232025-08-31T00:00:00Z2023-01-01T00:00:00Zbook partinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/16752eng978166848064910.4018/978-1-6684-8064-9.ch014info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-02-12T07:31:18Zoai:repositorio.ipl.pt:10400.21/16752Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T19:50:16.185911Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Exploring ethical principles amongst practicing community pharmacists in Portugal: any reasons for concern? |
title |
Exploring ethical principles amongst practicing community pharmacists in Portugal: any reasons for concern? |
spellingShingle |
Exploring ethical principles amongst practicing community pharmacists in Portugal: any reasons for concern? Cavaco, Afonso Miguel Ethics Dilemmas Moral reasoning Pharmacist Portugal |
title_short |
Exploring ethical principles amongst practicing community pharmacists in Portugal: any reasons for concern? |
title_full |
Exploring ethical principles amongst practicing community pharmacists in Portugal: any reasons for concern? |
title_fullStr |
Exploring ethical principles amongst practicing community pharmacists in Portugal: any reasons for concern? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Exploring ethical principles amongst practicing community pharmacists in Portugal: any reasons for concern? |
title_sort |
Exploring ethical principles amongst practicing community pharmacists in Portugal: any reasons for concern? |
author |
Cavaco, Afonso Miguel |
author_facet |
Cavaco, Afonso Miguel Grilo, Ana Barros, Luisa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Grilo, Ana Barros, Luisa |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
RCIPL |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cavaco, Afonso Miguel Grilo, Ana Barros, Luisa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ethics Dilemmas Moral reasoning Pharmacist Portugal |
topic |
Ethics Dilemmas Moral reasoning Pharmacist Portugal |
description |
Pharmacists facing ethical dilemmas have shown weaknesses in principled reasoning and disclosure. The chapter describes research on Portuguese community pharmacists' moral reasoning and narrative ethics. A cross-sectional survey comprising vignettes with practice ethical dilemmas, their possible justifications, and an open box for textual accounts was used as the research tool. More than 270 pharmacists replied, primarily young (<35 years old) female practitioners and 75% were involved in direct contact with patients. At least 50% of the sample showed compliance with the expected ethical-based decisions, except for the non-maleficence principle (10.9%); although receiving the highest proportion of the corresponding justification (30.3%), no open accounts or narratives were registered. The present findings suggest ethical passivity associated with decision-making in practice and a potential conflict between the clinical and the business roles. Explicit ethical norms for practice guidance and additional moral reasoning and narrative training are suggested. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z 2025-08-31T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
book part |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/16752 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/16752 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
9781668480649 10.4018/978-1-6684-8064-9.ch014 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IGI Global |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IGI Global |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833598349834452992 |