Grisotti flap reconstruction: on the edge of breast conserving surgery

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ormonde,Mariana
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: Cabral,Francisco, Santos,Catarina Rodrigues, Costa,Cristina Sousa, Vargas-Moniz,João, Santos,Antónia, Alves,Rui Serra
Format: Other
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-58302020000200003
Summary: Overview and aims: Breast tumors that invade or are proximal to the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) have been classically treated with mastectomy. As an alternative, on the edge of breast conserving surgery, these cases may be approached using central lumpectomy and immediate reconstruction with Grisotti flap. The aim of this study was to determine the involved margins rate and locoregional and systemic relapse rates in patients that underwent this surgical technique. Study Design: Retrospective observational descriptive study. Population: Women that underwent central lumpectomy and Grisotti flap reconstruction in our center, during a 4-year period. Methods: We reviewed clinical charts on patients’ data including: diagnosis, indication for surgery, pathological findings, adjuvant treatments and relapse. Descriptive and bivariate analysis was performed. Results: A total of 45 women were enrolled in the study. From these, 82.2% had invasive breast cancer, and the others had in situ disease. For characterization of tumor proximity to NAC, all patients were evaluated using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. All women underwent central lumpectomy with NAC excision, followed by Grisotti flap reconstruction. From these, 68.9% also underwent contralateral symmetrization on the same operating time. Also, in 80% we were able to perform sentinel lymph node biopsy and in 20% axillary lymphadenectomy was done. Median surgery duration was 71 minutes and median in-hospital stays was 1 day. In two cases, positive margins were present and reintervention was necessary. Considering other cancer treatments, 8.9% underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 48.9% adjuvant chemotherapy, 93.3% radiotherapy and 88.9% hormonal therapy. For a median follow-up time of 31 months, we report one case of locoregional relapse and one case of systemic relapse. Conclusions: Central lumpectomy combined with immediate Grisotti flap reconstruction is a good alternative for centrally located breast tumors. We report low positive margins rates (4.4%) and low relapse rates (2.3% for locoregional and 2.3% for systemic relapse).
id RCAP_54035ba1ccb971b68f48572c4740729d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1646-58302020000200003
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Grisotti flap reconstruction: on the edge of breast conserving surgeryBreast cancerBreast conserving surgeryGrisottiOverview and aims: Breast tumors that invade or are proximal to the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) have been classically treated with mastectomy. As an alternative, on the edge of breast conserving surgery, these cases may be approached using central lumpectomy and immediate reconstruction with Grisotti flap. The aim of this study was to determine the involved margins rate and locoregional and systemic relapse rates in patients that underwent this surgical technique. Study Design: Retrospective observational descriptive study. Population: Women that underwent central lumpectomy and Grisotti flap reconstruction in our center, during a 4-year period. Methods: We reviewed clinical charts on patients’ data including: diagnosis, indication for surgery, pathological findings, adjuvant treatments and relapse. Descriptive and bivariate analysis was performed. Results: A total of 45 women were enrolled in the study. From these, 82.2% had invasive breast cancer, and the others had in situ disease. For characterization of tumor proximity to NAC, all patients were evaluated using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. All women underwent central lumpectomy with NAC excision, followed by Grisotti flap reconstruction. From these, 68.9% also underwent contralateral symmetrization on the same operating time. Also, in 80% we were able to perform sentinel lymph node biopsy and in 20% axillary lymphadenectomy was done. Median surgery duration was 71 minutes and median in-hospital stays was 1 day. In two cases, positive margins were present and reintervention was necessary. Considering other cancer treatments, 8.9% underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 48.9% adjuvant chemotherapy, 93.3% radiotherapy and 88.9% hormonal therapy. For a median follow-up time of 31 months, we report one case of locoregional relapse and one case of systemic relapse. Conclusions: Central lumpectomy combined with immediate Grisotti flap reconstruction is a good alternative for centrally located breast tumors. We report low positive margins rates (4.4%) and low relapse rates (2.3% for locoregional and 2.3% for systemic relapse).Euromédice, Edições Médicas Lda.2020-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/othertext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-58302020000200003Acta Obstétrica e Ginecológica Portuguesa v.14 n.2 2020reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-58302020000200003Ormonde,MarianaCabral,FranciscoSantos,Catarina RodriguesCosta,Cristina SousaVargas-Moniz,JoãoSantos,AntóniaAlves,Rui Serrainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:21:48Zoai:scielo:S1646-58302020000200003Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T13:09:11.247346Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Grisotti flap reconstruction: on the edge of breast conserving surgery
title Grisotti flap reconstruction: on the edge of breast conserving surgery
spellingShingle Grisotti flap reconstruction: on the edge of breast conserving surgery
Ormonde,Mariana
Breast cancer
Breast conserving surgery
Grisotti
title_short Grisotti flap reconstruction: on the edge of breast conserving surgery
title_full Grisotti flap reconstruction: on the edge of breast conserving surgery
title_fullStr Grisotti flap reconstruction: on the edge of breast conserving surgery
title_full_unstemmed Grisotti flap reconstruction: on the edge of breast conserving surgery
title_sort Grisotti flap reconstruction: on the edge of breast conserving surgery
author Ormonde,Mariana
author_facet Ormonde,Mariana
Cabral,Francisco
Santos,Catarina Rodrigues
Costa,Cristina Sousa
Vargas-Moniz,João
Santos,Antónia
Alves,Rui Serra
author_role author
author2 Cabral,Francisco
Santos,Catarina Rodrigues
Costa,Cristina Sousa
Vargas-Moniz,João
Santos,Antónia
Alves,Rui Serra
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ormonde,Mariana
Cabral,Francisco
Santos,Catarina Rodrigues
Costa,Cristina Sousa
Vargas-Moniz,João
Santos,Antónia
Alves,Rui Serra
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Breast cancer
Breast conserving surgery
Grisotti
topic Breast cancer
Breast conserving surgery
Grisotti
description Overview and aims: Breast tumors that invade or are proximal to the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) have been classically treated with mastectomy. As an alternative, on the edge of breast conserving surgery, these cases may be approached using central lumpectomy and immediate reconstruction with Grisotti flap. The aim of this study was to determine the involved margins rate and locoregional and systemic relapse rates in patients that underwent this surgical technique. Study Design: Retrospective observational descriptive study. Population: Women that underwent central lumpectomy and Grisotti flap reconstruction in our center, during a 4-year period. Methods: We reviewed clinical charts on patients’ data including: diagnosis, indication for surgery, pathological findings, adjuvant treatments and relapse. Descriptive and bivariate analysis was performed. Results: A total of 45 women were enrolled in the study. From these, 82.2% had invasive breast cancer, and the others had in situ disease. For characterization of tumor proximity to NAC, all patients were evaluated using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. All women underwent central lumpectomy with NAC excision, followed by Grisotti flap reconstruction. From these, 68.9% also underwent contralateral symmetrization on the same operating time. Also, in 80% we were able to perform sentinel lymph node biopsy and in 20% axillary lymphadenectomy was done. Median surgery duration was 71 minutes and median in-hospital stays was 1 day. In two cases, positive margins were present and reintervention was necessary. Considering other cancer treatments, 8.9% underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 48.9% adjuvant chemotherapy, 93.3% radiotherapy and 88.9% hormonal therapy. For a median follow-up time of 31 months, we report one case of locoregional relapse and one case of systemic relapse. Conclusions: Central lumpectomy combined with immediate Grisotti flap reconstruction is a good alternative for centrally located breast tumors. We report low positive margins rates (4.4%) and low relapse rates (2.3% for locoregional and 2.3% for systemic relapse).
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format other
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-58302020000200003
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-58302020000200003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-58302020000200003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Euromédice, Edições Médicas Lda.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Euromédice, Edições Médicas Lda.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Obstétrica e Ginecológica Portuguesa v.14 n.2 2020
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833593486341832704