Foraging behaviour of four albatross species by night and day

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Phalan, Ben
Publication Date: 2007
Other Authors: Phillips, Richard A., Silk, Janet R. D., Afanasyev, Vsevolod, Fukuda, Akira, Fox, James, Catry, Paulo, Higuchi, Hiroyoshi, Croxall, John P.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/1428
Summary: We integrated information from satellite transmitters, GPS loggers and wet/dry activity loggers to compare the at-sea behaviour of 4 sympatric albatross species by night and day: wandering Diomedea exulans, grey-headed Thalassarche chrysostoma, black-browed T. melanophrys and light-mantled sooty Phoebetria palpebrata (in total, 350 foraging trips by 101 individuals). Trip duration, distance and maximum range varied more within species between stages (incubation, broodguard and post-brood) than between species at the same stage, implying that reproductive constraints are more important than interspecific competition in shaping foraging behaviour. Wandering albatrosses spent more time on the water in fewer, longer bouts than other species. The proportion of time spent on the water was similar among the 3 smaller species. The partitioning of foraging activity between day and night varied little between species: all landed and took off more often, but spent less time overall on the water during the day than at night. This supports observations that albatrosses forage most actively during daylight, even though many of their fish and squid prey approach the surface only at night. Albatrosses were more active on bright moonlit nights, seem to have no fixed daily requirement for sleep, rest or digestion time on the water, can navigate in darkness, and are probably unhindered by the slight reduction in mean wind strength at night. They are probably less active at night because their ability to see and capture prey from the air is reduced and it is then more energy-efficient for them to rest or to catch prey using a ‘sit-and-wait’ foraging strategy.
id RCAP_510716f1fbcd9b6b485d2e28dee450d2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/1428
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Foraging behaviour of four albatross species by night and dayActivity patternsProcellariiformesSeabirdDiel cycleLunar rhythmBird islandSouth GeorgiaWe integrated information from satellite transmitters, GPS loggers and wet/dry activity loggers to compare the at-sea behaviour of 4 sympatric albatross species by night and day: wandering Diomedea exulans, grey-headed Thalassarche chrysostoma, black-browed T. melanophrys and light-mantled sooty Phoebetria palpebrata (in total, 350 foraging trips by 101 individuals). Trip duration, distance and maximum range varied more within species between stages (incubation, broodguard and post-brood) than between species at the same stage, implying that reproductive constraints are more important than interspecific competition in shaping foraging behaviour. Wandering albatrosses spent more time on the water in fewer, longer bouts than other species. The proportion of time spent on the water was similar among the 3 smaller species. The partitioning of foraging activity between day and night varied little between species: all landed and took off more often, but spent less time overall on the water during the day than at night. This supports observations that albatrosses forage most actively during daylight, even though many of their fish and squid prey approach the surface only at night. Albatrosses were more active on bright moonlit nights, seem to have no fixed daily requirement for sleep, rest or digestion time on the water, can navigate in darkness, and are probably unhindered by the slight reduction in mean wind strength at night. They are probably less active at night because their ability to see and capture prey from the air is reduced and it is then more energy-efficient for them to rest or to catch prey using a ‘sit-and-wait’ foraging strategy.Inter-ResearchRepositório do ISPAPhalan, BenPhillips, Richard A.Silk, Janet R. D.Afanasyev, VsevolodFukuda, AkiraFox, JamesCatry, PauloHiguchi, HiroyoshiCroxall, John P.2012-05-29T19:49:29Z20072007-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/1428eng0171-8630info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-07T15:05:19Zoai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/1428Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T01:08:59.599852Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Foraging behaviour of four albatross species by night and day
title Foraging behaviour of four albatross species by night and day
spellingShingle Foraging behaviour of four albatross species by night and day
Phalan, Ben
Activity patterns
Procellariiformes
Seabird
Diel cycle
Lunar rhythm
Bird island
South Georgia
title_short Foraging behaviour of four albatross species by night and day
title_full Foraging behaviour of four albatross species by night and day
title_fullStr Foraging behaviour of four albatross species by night and day
title_full_unstemmed Foraging behaviour of four albatross species by night and day
title_sort Foraging behaviour of four albatross species by night and day
author Phalan, Ben
author_facet Phalan, Ben
Phillips, Richard A.
Silk, Janet R. D.
Afanasyev, Vsevolod
Fukuda, Akira
Fox, James
Catry, Paulo
Higuchi, Hiroyoshi
Croxall, John P.
author_role author
author2 Phillips, Richard A.
Silk, Janet R. D.
Afanasyev, Vsevolod
Fukuda, Akira
Fox, James
Catry, Paulo
Higuchi, Hiroyoshi
Croxall, John P.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório do ISPA
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Phalan, Ben
Phillips, Richard A.
Silk, Janet R. D.
Afanasyev, Vsevolod
Fukuda, Akira
Fox, James
Catry, Paulo
Higuchi, Hiroyoshi
Croxall, John P.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Activity patterns
Procellariiformes
Seabird
Diel cycle
Lunar rhythm
Bird island
South Georgia
topic Activity patterns
Procellariiformes
Seabird
Diel cycle
Lunar rhythm
Bird island
South Georgia
description We integrated information from satellite transmitters, GPS loggers and wet/dry activity loggers to compare the at-sea behaviour of 4 sympatric albatross species by night and day: wandering Diomedea exulans, grey-headed Thalassarche chrysostoma, black-browed T. melanophrys and light-mantled sooty Phoebetria palpebrata (in total, 350 foraging trips by 101 individuals). Trip duration, distance and maximum range varied more within species between stages (incubation, broodguard and post-brood) than between species at the same stage, implying that reproductive constraints are more important than interspecific competition in shaping foraging behaviour. Wandering albatrosses spent more time on the water in fewer, longer bouts than other species. The proportion of time spent on the water was similar among the 3 smaller species. The partitioning of foraging activity between day and night varied little between species: all landed and took off more often, but spent less time overall on the water during the day than at night. This supports observations that albatrosses forage most actively during daylight, even though many of their fish and squid prey approach the surface only at night. Albatrosses were more active on bright moonlit nights, seem to have no fixed daily requirement for sleep, rest or digestion time on the water, can navigate in darkness, and are probably unhindered by the slight reduction in mean wind strength at night. They are probably less active at night because their ability to see and capture prey from the air is reduced and it is then more energy-efficient for them to rest or to catch prey using a ‘sit-and-wait’ foraging strategy.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007
2007-01-01T00:00:00Z
2012-05-29T19:49:29Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/1428
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/1428
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0171-8630
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Inter-Research
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Inter-Research
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833600851384467456