Socialism: Utilitarian and deontic
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2023 |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.5.1.179 |
Summary: | This article argues that those who advocate the capitalist market system on the basis of the ‘invisible hand’ or ‘spontaneous order’ belong to a tradition in political philosophy which attempts to find ways to get the most out of a flawed human nature, whereas socialists tend to belong to the opposing tradition which maintains faith in human improvement. The former tradition involves a kind of consequentialism in which goodness can be achieved irrespective of people’s intentions, whereas the latter tradition, with its emphasis on conscious decision making and the ‘good will’, includes Kantian deontology. Both utilitarian and deontological arguments for socialism are discussed, but it is argued that the emphases on human dignity and on deliberate planned action make socialist arguments sit more comfortably with deontology. This is most clearly the case when socialist thinkers transform Kantian monological universality into dialogical and communicative mutuality. |
id |
RCAP_2f30ae0e3a94350717eddb4fc9d34a00 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:journals.uminho.pt:article/5337 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Socialism: Utilitarian and deonticOriginal ArticlesThis article argues that those who advocate the capitalist market system on the basis of the ‘invisible hand’ or ‘spontaneous order’ belong to a tradition in political philosophy which attempts to find ways to get the most out of a flawed human nature, whereas socialists tend to belong to the opposing tradition which maintains faith in human improvement. The former tradition involves a kind of consequentialism in which goodness can be achieved irrespective of people’s intentions, whereas the latter tradition, with its emphasis on conscious decision making and the ‘good will’, includes Kantian deontology. Both utilitarian and deontological arguments for socialism are discussed, but it is argued that the emphases on human dignity and on deliberate planned action make socialist arguments sit more comfortably with deontology. This is most clearly the case when socialist thinkers transform Kantian monological universality into dialogical and communicative mutuality.Argumenta-se neste artigo que aqueles que defendem um sistema de mercado capitalista tendo por base a “mão invisível” ou a “ordem espontânea” pertencem a uma tradição da filosofia política que procura resgatar o máximo possível de uma natureza humana defeituosa, ao passo que os socialistas tendem a pertencer a uma tradição oposta que assenta numa fé no progresso humano. A primeira das tradições pressupõe uma espécie de consequencialismo no qual a bondade pode ser obtida independentemente das intenções das pessoas, ao passo que a segunda, dada a sua ênfase na tomada consciente de decisões e na “vontade boa” esteia-se numa deontologia Kantiana. Discutem-se aqui tanto argumentos de tipo utilitário como deontológico a favor do socialismo, mas sugere-se que a ênfase na dignidade humana e em acções deliberadas e planeadas tornam os argumentos socialistas mais consentâneos com uma abordagem deontológica. Isto é sobretudo evidente quando os pensadores socialistas transformam a universalidade monológica Kantiana numa mutualidade dialógica e comunicativa.Centre for Ethics, Politics, and Society - ELACH, University of Minho2023-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.21814/eps.5.1.179eng2184-25822184-2574Skempton, Simoninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-09-28T10:35:35Zoai:journals.uminho.pt:article/5337Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T12:34:20.039453Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Socialism: Utilitarian and deontic |
title |
Socialism: Utilitarian and deontic |
spellingShingle |
Socialism: Utilitarian and deontic Skempton, Simon Original Articles |
title_short |
Socialism: Utilitarian and deontic |
title_full |
Socialism: Utilitarian and deontic |
title_fullStr |
Socialism: Utilitarian and deontic |
title_full_unstemmed |
Socialism: Utilitarian and deontic |
title_sort |
Socialism: Utilitarian and deontic |
author |
Skempton, Simon |
author_facet |
Skempton, Simon |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Skempton, Simon |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Original Articles |
topic |
Original Articles |
description |
This article argues that those who advocate the capitalist market system on the basis of the ‘invisible hand’ or ‘spontaneous order’ belong to a tradition in political philosophy which attempts to find ways to get the most out of a flawed human nature, whereas socialists tend to belong to the opposing tradition which maintains faith in human improvement. The former tradition involves a kind of consequentialism in which goodness can be achieved irrespective of people’s intentions, whereas the latter tradition, with its emphasis on conscious decision making and the ‘good will’, includes Kantian deontology. Both utilitarian and deontological arguments for socialism are discussed, but it is argued that the emphases on human dignity and on deliberate planned action make socialist arguments sit more comfortably with deontology. This is most clearly the case when socialist thinkers transform Kantian monological universality into dialogical and communicative mutuality. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.5.1.179 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.5.1.179 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2184-2582 2184-2574 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centre for Ethics, Politics, and Society - ELACH, University of Minho |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centre for Ethics, Politics, and Society - ELACH, University of Minho |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833592935925415936 |