German law covering the public participation in planning and building infrastructure projects

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bothe, Anja
Publication Date: 2015
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/11144/3401
Summary: Large size infrastructure projects, such as airport, rail and road extensions, are particularly likely to encounter frequent citizens´ protests. The experience with the enhancements of the Stuttgart train station is an especially relevant example, since it has motivated the economic stakeholders, as well as the German federal and regional legislators and administrations, to rethink the project. In this case, which has become known as “Stuttgart 21”, massive resistance only materialized after the planning approval procedure. As a consequence, the "Law for broadening the public participation and for the standardization of the procedures for determining sectorial plans" was introduced in the German legislature in 2012. Among other elements in this law, public participation is now required prior to the formal opening of the procedure for planning and approval of sectorial plans, as described in Article 25, paragraph 3, of the Administrative Procedure Code. In 2013, the Association of German Engineers developed standards governing the communication and public participation in planning and building infrastructure projects. These standards are directed at project sponsors, general and specialist design contractors, project managers, executing companies and their officials. In the same year, regional governments produced binding administrative provisions to intensify public participation in the planning and licensing procedures of large infrastructure projects. These standards and administrative provisions establish several mandatory steps and procedures within the regional planning and approval processes: these mandatory steps include scoping the previous and present participation of the public and their interaction, both at formal and informal levels, conducting an official investigation to show just cause for the project, establishing internet access to the project allowing for on‐line search of the detailed plans by the public, a requirement to request and enable public participation periodically as the planning process develops, and a need to re‐ evaluate these new rules as appropriate. Similar rules have been introduced since the 1980’s by the European Union to advance and implement environmental protection. The main objective of these mandatory steps is a more efficient harmonization of the different interests involved in spatial planning. In order to establish a more solid foundation for a critical analysis of several of the elements in these rules, this paper discusses the essential factors impacting these types of plans, the skills required in their preparation, the strategies leading to acceptance of those plans, and the possible dynamics affecting their implementation. Nevertheless, these legal, administrative and private rules have come under some criticism, as listed below: ‐ several basic aspects of these rules are not sufficiently focused on the associated extra‐legal problems that they raise; ‐ some elements are voluntary rather than mandatory, while others are not precisely defined so as not to scare away potential investors; 19 ‐ while aiming at achieving more efficiency, several new obligations limit, qualitatively as well as quantitatively, the holding of successive stages of public participation, partly due to a clause that excludes the discussion of public rights which have not been presented during prior public participation; ‐ concerning environmental protection interests, the obligations of evaluation and participation focus only on the processes themselves, but do not aim at avoiding any resulting environmental harm.
id RCAP_2e8a098ce3b9963256a86b13fea22eaa
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ual.pt:11144/3401
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling German law covering the public participation in planning and building infrastructure projectspublic participationspatial planninglicensing procedure of infrastrucure projectsLarge size infrastructure projects, such as airport, rail and road extensions, are particularly likely to encounter frequent citizens´ protests. The experience with the enhancements of the Stuttgart train station is an especially relevant example, since it has motivated the economic stakeholders, as well as the German federal and regional legislators and administrations, to rethink the project. In this case, which has become known as “Stuttgart 21”, massive resistance only materialized after the planning approval procedure. As a consequence, the "Law for broadening the public participation and for the standardization of the procedures for determining sectorial plans" was introduced in the German legislature in 2012. Among other elements in this law, public participation is now required prior to the formal opening of the procedure for planning and approval of sectorial plans, as described in Article 25, paragraph 3, of the Administrative Procedure Code. In 2013, the Association of German Engineers developed standards governing the communication and public participation in planning and building infrastructure projects. These standards are directed at project sponsors, general and specialist design contractors, project managers, executing companies and their officials. In the same year, regional governments produced binding administrative provisions to intensify public participation in the planning and licensing procedures of large infrastructure projects. These standards and administrative provisions establish several mandatory steps and procedures within the regional planning and approval processes: these mandatory steps include scoping the previous and present participation of the public and their interaction, both at formal and informal levels, conducting an official investigation to show just cause for the project, establishing internet access to the project allowing for on‐line search of the detailed plans by the public, a requirement to request and enable public participation periodically as the planning process develops, and a need to re‐ evaluate these new rules as appropriate. Similar rules have been introduced since the 1980’s by the European Union to advance and implement environmental protection. The main objective of these mandatory steps is a more efficient harmonization of the different interests involved in spatial planning. In order to establish a more solid foundation for a critical analysis of several of the elements in these rules, this paper discusses the essential factors impacting these types of plans, the skills required in their preparation, the strategies leading to acceptance of those plans, and the possible dynamics affecting their implementation. Nevertheless, these legal, administrative and private rules have come under some criticism, as listed below: ‐ several basic aspects of these rules are not sufficiently focused on the associated extra‐legal problems that they raise; ‐ some elements are voluntary rather than mandatory, while others are not precisely defined so as not to scare away potential investors; 19 ‐ while aiming at achieving more efficiency, several new obligations limit, qualitatively as well as quantitatively, the holding of successive stages of public participation, partly due to a clause that excludes the discussion of public rights which have not been presented during prior public participation; ‐ concerning environmental protection interests, the obligations of evaluation and participation focus only on the processes themselves, but do not aim at avoiding any resulting environmental harm.Light MIST Assotiation for Regional Development2018-01-24T15:31:26Z2015-01-01T00:00:00Z2015conference objectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11144/3401eng978-989-20-6062-0Bothe, Anjainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-08-01T02:04:26Zoai:repositorio.ual.pt:11144/3401Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T18:41:54.012021Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv German law covering the public participation in planning and building infrastructure projects
title German law covering the public participation in planning and building infrastructure projects
spellingShingle German law covering the public participation in planning and building infrastructure projects
Bothe, Anja
public participation
spatial planning
licensing procedure of infrastrucure projects
title_short German law covering the public participation in planning and building infrastructure projects
title_full German law covering the public participation in planning and building infrastructure projects
title_fullStr German law covering the public participation in planning and building infrastructure projects
title_full_unstemmed German law covering the public participation in planning and building infrastructure projects
title_sort German law covering the public participation in planning and building infrastructure projects
author Bothe, Anja
author_facet Bothe, Anja
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bothe, Anja
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv public participation
spatial planning
licensing procedure of infrastrucure projects
topic public participation
spatial planning
licensing procedure of infrastrucure projects
description Large size infrastructure projects, such as airport, rail and road extensions, are particularly likely to encounter frequent citizens´ protests. The experience with the enhancements of the Stuttgart train station is an especially relevant example, since it has motivated the economic stakeholders, as well as the German federal and regional legislators and administrations, to rethink the project. In this case, which has become known as “Stuttgart 21”, massive resistance only materialized after the planning approval procedure. As a consequence, the "Law for broadening the public participation and for the standardization of the procedures for determining sectorial plans" was introduced in the German legislature in 2012. Among other elements in this law, public participation is now required prior to the formal opening of the procedure for planning and approval of sectorial plans, as described in Article 25, paragraph 3, of the Administrative Procedure Code. In 2013, the Association of German Engineers developed standards governing the communication and public participation in planning and building infrastructure projects. These standards are directed at project sponsors, general and specialist design contractors, project managers, executing companies and their officials. In the same year, regional governments produced binding administrative provisions to intensify public participation in the planning and licensing procedures of large infrastructure projects. These standards and administrative provisions establish several mandatory steps and procedures within the regional planning and approval processes: these mandatory steps include scoping the previous and present participation of the public and their interaction, both at formal and informal levels, conducting an official investigation to show just cause for the project, establishing internet access to the project allowing for on‐line search of the detailed plans by the public, a requirement to request and enable public participation periodically as the planning process develops, and a need to re‐ evaluate these new rules as appropriate. Similar rules have been introduced since the 1980’s by the European Union to advance and implement environmental protection. The main objective of these mandatory steps is a more efficient harmonization of the different interests involved in spatial planning. In order to establish a more solid foundation for a critical analysis of several of the elements in these rules, this paper discusses the essential factors impacting these types of plans, the skills required in their preparation, the strategies leading to acceptance of those plans, and the possible dynamics affecting their implementation. Nevertheless, these legal, administrative and private rules have come under some criticism, as listed below: ‐ several basic aspects of these rules are not sufficiently focused on the associated extra‐legal problems that they raise; ‐ some elements are voluntary rather than mandatory, while others are not precisely defined so as not to scare away potential investors; 19 ‐ while aiming at achieving more efficiency, several new obligations limit, qualitatively as well as quantitatively, the holding of successive stages of public participation, partly due to a clause that excludes the discussion of public rights which have not been presented during prior public participation; ‐ concerning environmental protection interests, the obligations of evaluation and participation focus only on the processes themselves, but do not aim at avoiding any resulting environmental harm.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
2015
2018-01-24T15:31:26Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv conference object
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11144/3401
url http://hdl.handle.net/11144/3401
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 978-989-20-6062-0
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Light MIST Assotiation for Regional Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Light MIST Assotiation for Regional Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833597601510850560