Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Almeida, JG
Publication Date: 2017
Other Authors: Fontes-Carvalho, R, Sampaio, F, Ribeiro, J, Bettencourt, P, Flachskampf, FA, Leite-Moreira, A, Azevedo, A
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10216/111622
Summary: Aims: Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is frequent in the general population; however, the assessment of diastolic function remains challenging. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the recent 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) recommendations in the prevalence and grades of DD compared with the 2009 guidelines and the Canberra Study Criteria (CSC). Methods and results: Within a population-based cohort, a total of 1000 individuals, aged ≥45 years, were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with previously known cardiac disease or ejection fraction <50% were excluded. Diastolic function was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. DD prevalence and grades were determined according to the three classifications. The mean age was 62.0 ± 10.5 years and 37% were men. The prevalence of DD was 1.4% (n = 14) with the 2016 recommendations, 38.1% (n = 381) with the 2009 recommendations, and 30.4% (n = 304) using the CSC. The concordance between the updated recommendations and the other two was poor (from k = 0.13 to k = 0.18, P < 0.001). Regarding the categorization in DD grades, none of the 14 individuals with DD by the 2016 guidelines were assigned to Grade 1 DD, 64% were classified as Grade 2, 7% had Grade 3, and 29% had indeterminate grade. Conclusion: The application of the new 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations resulted in a much lower prevalence of DD. The concordance between the classifications was poor. The updated algorithm seems to be able to diagnose only the most advanced cases.
id RCAP_261d948b697fac6f65ef9bfe320de22a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/111622
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general populationDiastoleEchocardiographyDiastolic dysfunctionHeart failureAims: Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is frequent in the general population; however, the assessment of diastolic function remains challenging. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the recent 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) recommendations in the prevalence and grades of DD compared with the 2009 guidelines and the Canberra Study Criteria (CSC). Methods and results: Within a population-based cohort, a total of 1000 individuals, aged ≥45 years, were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with previously known cardiac disease or ejection fraction <50% were excluded. Diastolic function was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. DD prevalence and grades were determined according to the three classifications. The mean age was 62.0 ± 10.5 years and 37% were men. The prevalence of DD was 1.4% (n = 14) with the 2016 recommendations, 38.1% (n = 381) with the 2009 recommendations, and 30.4% (n = 304) using the CSC. The concordance between the updated recommendations and the other two was poor (from k = 0.13 to k = 0.18, P < 0.001). Regarding the categorization in DD grades, none of the 14 individuals with DD by the 2016 guidelines were assigned to Grade 1 DD, 64% were classified as Grade 2, 7% had Grade 3, and 29% had indeterminate grade. Conclusion: The application of the new 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations resulted in a much lower prevalence of DD. The concordance between the classifications was poor. The updated algorithm seems to be able to diagnose only the most advanced cases.European Society of Cardiology20172017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10216/111622eng2047-241210.1093/ehjci/jex252Almeida, JGFontes-Carvalho, RSampaio, FRibeiro, JBettencourt, PFlachskampf, FALeite-Moreira, AAzevedo, Ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-02-27T17:52:35Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/111622Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T22:29:40.163635Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population
title Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population
spellingShingle Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population
Almeida, JG
Diastole
Echocardiography
Diastolic dysfunction
Heart failure
title_short Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population
title_full Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population
title_fullStr Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population
title_sort Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population
author Almeida, JG
author_facet Almeida, JG
Fontes-Carvalho, R
Sampaio, F
Ribeiro, J
Bettencourt, P
Flachskampf, FA
Leite-Moreira, A
Azevedo, A
author_role author
author2 Fontes-Carvalho, R
Sampaio, F
Ribeiro, J
Bettencourt, P
Flachskampf, FA
Leite-Moreira, A
Azevedo, A
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida, JG
Fontes-Carvalho, R
Sampaio, F
Ribeiro, J
Bettencourt, P
Flachskampf, FA
Leite-Moreira, A
Azevedo, A
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Diastole
Echocardiography
Diastolic dysfunction
Heart failure
topic Diastole
Echocardiography
Diastolic dysfunction
Heart failure
description Aims: Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is frequent in the general population; however, the assessment of diastolic function remains challenging. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the recent 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) recommendations in the prevalence and grades of DD compared with the 2009 guidelines and the Canberra Study Criteria (CSC). Methods and results: Within a population-based cohort, a total of 1000 individuals, aged ≥45 years, were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with previously known cardiac disease or ejection fraction <50% were excluded. Diastolic function was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. DD prevalence and grades were determined according to the three classifications. The mean age was 62.0 ± 10.5 years and 37% were men. The prevalence of DD was 1.4% (n = 14) with the 2016 recommendations, 38.1% (n = 381) with the 2009 recommendations, and 30.4% (n = 304) using the CSC. The concordance between the updated recommendations and the other two was poor (from k = 0.13 to k = 0.18, P < 0.001). Regarding the categorization in DD grades, none of the 14 individuals with DD by the 2016 guidelines were assigned to Grade 1 DD, 64% were classified as Grade 2, 7% had Grade 3, and 29% had indeterminate grade. Conclusion: The application of the new 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations resulted in a much lower prevalence of DD. The concordance between the classifications was poor. The updated algorithm seems to be able to diagnose only the most advanced cases.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10216/111622
url http://hdl.handle.net/10216/111622
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2047-2412
10.1093/ehjci/jex252
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv European Society of Cardiology
publisher.none.fl_str_mv European Society of Cardiology
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833599715666558976