Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2017 |
| Other Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | eng |
| Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10216/111622 |
Summary: | Aims: Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is frequent in the general population; however, the assessment of diastolic function remains challenging. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the recent 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) recommendations in the prevalence and grades of DD compared with the 2009 guidelines and the Canberra Study Criteria (CSC). Methods and results: Within a population-based cohort, a total of 1000 individuals, aged ≥45 years, were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with previously known cardiac disease or ejection fraction <50% were excluded. Diastolic function was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. DD prevalence and grades were determined according to the three classifications. The mean age was 62.0 ± 10.5 years and 37% were men. The prevalence of DD was 1.4% (n = 14) with the 2016 recommendations, 38.1% (n = 381) with the 2009 recommendations, and 30.4% (n = 304) using the CSC. The concordance between the updated recommendations and the other two was poor (from k = 0.13 to k = 0.18, P < 0.001). Regarding the categorization in DD grades, none of the 14 individuals with DD by the 2016 guidelines were assigned to Grade 1 DD, 64% were classified as Grade 2, 7% had Grade 3, and 29% had indeterminate grade. Conclusion: The application of the new 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations resulted in a much lower prevalence of DD. The concordance between the classifications was poor. The updated algorithm seems to be able to diagnose only the most advanced cases. |
| id |
RCAP_261d948b697fac6f65ef9bfe320de22a |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/111622 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
| network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
| spelling |
Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general populationDiastoleEchocardiographyDiastolic dysfunctionHeart failureAims: Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is frequent in the general population; however, the assessment of diastolic function remains challenging. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the recent 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) recommendations in the prevalence and grades of DD compared with the 2009 guidelines and the Canberra Study Criteria (CSC). Methods and results: Within a population-based cohort, a total of 1000 individuals, aged ≥45 years, were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with previously known cardiac disease or ejection fraction <50% were excluded. Diastolic function was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. DD prevalence and grades were determined according to the three classifications. The mean age was 62.0 ± 10.5 years and 37% were men. The prevalence of DD was 1.4% (n = 14) with the 2016 recommendations, 38.1% (n = 381) with the 2009 recommendations, and 30.4% (n = 304) using the CSC. The concordance between the updated recommendations and the other two was poor (from k = 0.13 to k = 0.18, P < 0.001). Regarding the categorization in DD grades, none of the 14 individuals with DD by the 2016 guidelines were assigned to Grade 1 DD, 64% were classified as Grade 2, 7% had Grade 3, and 29% had indeterminate grade. Conclusion: The application of the new 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations resulted in a much lower prevalence of DD. The concordance between the classifications was poor. The updated algorithm seems to be able to diagnose only the most advanced cases.European Society of Cardiology20172017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10216/111622eng2047-241210.1093/ehjci/jex252Almeida, JGFontes-Carvalho, RSampaio, FRibeiro, JBettencourt, PFlachskampf, FALeite-Moreira, AAzevedo, Ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-02-27T17:52:35Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/111622Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T22:29:40.163635Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population |
| title |
Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population |
| spellingShingle |
Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population Almeida, JG Diastole Echocardiography Diastolic dysfunction Heart failure |
| title_short |
Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population |
| title_full |
Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population |
| title_fullStr |
Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population |
| title_sort |
Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population |
| author |
Almeida, JG |
| author_facet |
Almeida, JG Fontes-Carvalho, R Sampaio, F Ribeiro, J Bettencourt, P Flachskampf, FA Leite-Moreira, A Azevedo, A |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Fontes-Carvalho, R Sampaio, F Ribeiro, J Bettencourt, P Flachskampf, FA Leite-Moreira, A Azevedo, A |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Almeida, JG Fontes-Carvalho, R Sampaio, F Ribeiro, J Bettencourt, P Flachskampf, FA Leite-Moreira, A Azevedo, A |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Diastole Echocardiography Diastolic dysfunction Heart failure |
| topic |
Diastole Echocardiography Diastolic dysfunction Heart failure |
| description |
Aims: Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is frequent in the general population; however, the assessment of diastolic function remains challenging. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the recent 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) recommendations in the prevalence and grades of DD compared with the 2009 guidelines and the Canberra Study Criteria (CSC). Methods and results: Within a population-based cohort, a total of 1000 individuals, aged ≥45 years, were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with previously known cardiac disease or ejection fraction <50% were excluded. Diastolic function was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. DD prevalence and grades were determined according to the three classifications. The mean age was 62.0 ± 10.5 years and 37% were men. The prevalence of DD was 1.4% (n = 14) with the 2016 recommendations, 38.1% (n = 381) with the 2009 recommendations, and 30.4% (n = 304) using the CSC. The concordance between the updated recommendations and the other two was poor (from k = 0.13 to k = 0.18, P < 0.001). Regarding the categorization in DD grades, none of the 14 individuals with DD by the 2016 guidelines were assigned to Grade 1 DD, 64% were classified as Grade 2, 7% had Grade 3, and 29% had indeterminate grade. Conclusion: The application of the new 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations resulted in a much lower prevalence of DD. The concordance between the classifications was poor. The updated algorithm seems to be able to diagnose only the most advanced cases. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10216/111622 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10216/111622 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2047-2412 10.1093/ehjci/jex252 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
European Society of Cardiology |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
European Society of Cardiology |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
| instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| instacron_str |
RCAAP |
| institution |
RCAAP |
| reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
| _version_ |
1833599715666558976 |