Export Ready — 

A comparison among optimization software to solve bi-objective sectorization problem

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Teymourifar, Aydin
Publication Date: 2023
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/41995
Summary: In this study, we compare the performance of optimization software to solve the bi-objective sectorization problem. The used solution method is based on an approach that has not been used before in the literature on sectorization, in which, the bi-objective model is transformed into single-objective ones, whose results are regarded as ideal points for the objective functions in the bi-objective model. Anti-ideal points are also searched similarly. Then, using the ideal and anti-ideal points, the bi-objective model is redefined as a single-objective one and solved. The difficulties of solving the models, which are basically non-linear, are discussed. Furthermore, the models are linearized, in which case how the number of variables and constraints changes is discussed. Mathematical models are implemented in Python's Pulp library, Lingo, IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio, and GAMS software, and the obtained results are presented. Furthermore, metaheuristics available in Python's Pymoo library are utilized to solve the models' single- and bi-objective versions. In the experimental results section, benchmarks of different sizes are derived for the problem, and the results are presented. It is observed that the solvers do not perform satisfactorily in solving models; of all of them, GAMS achieves the best results. The utilized metaheuristics from the Pymoo library gain feasible results in reasonable times. In the conclusion section, suggestions are given for solving similar problems. Furthermore, this article summarizes the managerial applications of the sectorization problems.
id RCAP_1fa21fefe4d8e7ea5dafef9fac026565
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/41995
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling A comparison among optimization software to solve bi-objective sectorization problemMulti-objective optimizationSectorizationMixed integer non-linear programmingGAMSCPLEXLingoPythonPulpPymooGANSGA-IIIn this study, we compare the performance of optimization software to solve the bi-objective sectorization problem. The used solution method is based on an approach that has not been used before in the literature on sectorization, in which, the bi-objective model is transformed into single-objective ones, whose results are regarded as ideal points for the objective functions in the bi-objective model. Anti-ideal points are also searched similarly. Then, using the ideal and anti-ideal points, the bi-objective model is redefined as a single-objective one and solved. The difficulties of solving the models, which are basically non-linear, are discussed. Furthermore, the models are linearized, in which case how the number of variables and constraints changes is discussed. Mathematical models are implemented in Python's Pulp library, Lingo, IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio, and GAMS software, and the obtained results are presented. Furthermore, metaheuristics available in Python's Pymoo library are utilized to solve the models' single- and bi-objective versions. In the experimental results section, benchmarks of different sizes are derived for the problem, and the results are presented. It is observed that the solvers do not perform satisfactorily in solving models; of all of them, GAMS achieves the best results. The utilized metaheuristics from the Pymoo library gain feasible results in reasonable times. In the conclusion section, suggestions are given for solving similar problems. Furthermore, this article summarizes the managerial applications of the sectorization problems.VeritatiTeymourifar, Aydin2023-07-31T15:55:54Z2023-08-012023-08-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/41995eng2405-844010.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18602info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-13T15:39:59Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/41995Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T02:14:24.108511Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison among optimization software to solve bi-objective sectorization problem
title A comparison among optimization software to solve bi-objective sectorization problem
spellingShingle A comparison among optimization software to solve bi-objective sectorization problem
Teymourifar, Aydin
Multi-objective optimization
Sectorization
Mixed integer non-linear programming
GAMS
CPLEX
Lingo
Python
Pulp
Pymoo
GA
NSGA-II
title_short A comparison among optimization software to solve bi-objective sectorization problem
title_full A comparison among optimization software to solve bi-objective sectorization problem
title_fullStr A comparison among optimization software to solve bi-objective sectorization problem
title_full_unstemmed A comparison among optimization software to solve bi-objective sectorization problem
title_sort A comparison among optimization software to solve bi-objective sectorization problem
author Teymourifar, Aydin
author_facet Teymourifar, Aydin
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Veritati
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teymourifar, Aydin
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Multi-objective optimization
Sectorization
Mixed integer non-linear programming
GAMS
CPLEX
Lingo
Python
Pulp
Pymoo
GA
NSGA-II
topic Multi-objective optimization
Sectorization
Mixed integer non-linear programming
GAMS
CPLEX
Lingo
Python
Pulp
Pymoo
GA
NSGA-II
description In this study, we compare the performance of optimization software to solve the bi-objective sectorization problem. The used solution method is based on an approach that has not been used before in the literature on sectorization, in which, the bi-objective model is transformed into single-objective ones, whose results are regarded as ideal points for the objective functions in the bi-objective model. Anti-ideal points are also searched similarly. Then, using the ideal and anti-ideal points, the bi-objective model is redefined as a single-objective one and solved. The difficulties of solving the models, which are basically non-linear, are discussed. Furthermore, the models are linearized, in which case how the number of variables and constraints changes is discussed. Mathematical models are implemented in Python's Pulp library, Lingo, IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio, and GAMS software, and the obtained results are presented. Furthermore, metaheuristics available in Python's Pymoo library are utilized to solve the models' single- and bi-objective versions. In the experimental results section, benchmarks of different sizes are derived for the problem, and the results are presented. It is observed that the solvers do not perform satisfactorily in solving models; of all of them, GAMS achieves the best results. The utilized metaheuristics from the Pymoo library gain feasible results in reasonable times. In the conclusion section, suggestions are given for solving similar problems. Furthermore, this article summarizes the managerial applications of the sectorization problems.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-31T15:55:54Z
2023-08-01
2023-08-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/41995
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/41995
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2405-8440
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18602
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833601280086376448