Motivation in sport and exercise: a comparison between the BRSQ and BREQ

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rodrigues, F
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: Macedo, Rui, Teixeira, DS, Cid-Lucas, Fernando, Monteiro, D
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/19248
Summary: This study aimed to test whether the Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire and the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire can measure the same constructs in an equivalent manner. Advanced statistical procedures were used to examine if these scales could be interchangeably applied to the sport and the exercise context. In total, 2256 indi- viduals (athletes = 1099; exercisers = 1157) completed translated and validated question- naires measuring all types of motivation based on Self-Determination Theory. Several measurement models were tested, such as confirmatory factor models, exploratory struc- tural equation models, and bifactor specifications. The exploratory structural equation modelling approach provided the best fit to the data in both groups. Multigroup analysis was performed within samples and between athletes and exercisers. Measurement model invariance was confirmed between samples from the same context; however, it did not achieve equivalence between scales. We hope this examination of context invariance analy- sis using specific validated scales can further help advance conceptual understanding of the measurement in sport and exercise.
id RCAP_1b9d26e1a10d5c308274ee3623bae5a6
oai_identifier_str oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/19248
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Motivation in sport and exercise: a comparison between the BRSQ and BREQPhysical activitySportExerciseSelf-determined motivationThis study aimed to test whether the Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire and the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire can measure the same constructs in an equivalent manner. Advanced statistical procedures were used to examine if these scales could be interchangeably applied to the sport and the exercise context. In total, 2256 indi- viduals (athletes = 1099; exercisers = 1157) completed translated and validated question- naires measuring all types of motivation based on Self-Determination Theory. Several measurement models were tested, such as confirmatory factor models, exploratory struc- tural equation models, and bifactor specifications. The exploratory structural equation modelling approach provided the best fit to the data in both groups. Multigroup analysis was performed within samples and between athletes and exercisers. Measurement model invariance was confirmed between samples from the same context; however, it did not achieve equivalence between scales. We hope this examination of context invariance analy- sis using specific validated scales can further help advance conceptual understanding of the measurement in sport and exercise.SpringerREPOSITÓRIO P.PORTORodrigues, FMacedo, RuiTeixeira, DSCid-Lucas, FernandoMonteiro, D2021-12-30T18:45:09Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/19248eng10.1007/s11135-020-00988-6info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-07T10:09:12Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/19248Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T00:37:12.152314Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Motivation in sport and exercise: a comparison between the BRSQ and BREQ
title Motivation in sport and exercise: a comparison between the BRSQ and BREQ
spellingShingle Motivation in sport and exercise: a comparison between the BRSQ and BREQ
Rodrigues, F
Physical activity
Sport
Exercise
Self-determined motivation
title_short Motivation in sport and exercise: a comparison between the BRSQ and BREQ
title_full Motivation in sport and exercise: a comparison between the BRSQ and BREQ
title_fullStr Motivation in sport and exercise: a comparison between the BRSQ and BREQ
title_full_unstemmed Motivation in sport and exercise: a comparison between the BRSQ and BREQ
title_sort Motivation in sport and exercise: a comparison between the BRSQ and BREQ
author Rodrigues, F
author_facet Rodrigues, F
Macedo, Rui
Teixeira, DS
Cid-Lucas, Fernando
Monteiro, D
author_role author
author2 Macedo, Rui
Teixeira, DS
Cid-Lucas, Fernando
Monteiro, D
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv REPOSITÓRIO P.PORTO
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, F
Macedo, Rui
Teixeira, DS
Cid-Lucas, Fernando
Monteiro, D
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Physical activity
Sport
Exercise
Self-determined motivation
topic Physical activity
Sport
Exercise
Self-determined motivation
description This study aimed to test whether the Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire and the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire can measure the same constructs in an equivalent manner. Advanced statistical procedures were used to examine if these scales could be interchangeably applied to the sport and the exercise context. In total, 2256 indi- viduals (athletes = 1099; exercisers = 1157) completed translated and validated question- naires measuring all types of motivation based on Self-Determination Theory. Several measurement models were tested, such as confirmatory factor models, exploratory struc- tural equation models, and bifactor specifications. The exploratory structural equation modelling approach provided the best fit to the data in both groups. Multigroup analysis was performed within samples and between athletes and exercisers. Measurement model invariance was confirmed between samples from the same context; however, it did not achieve equivalence between scales. We hope this examination of context invariance analy- sis using specific validated scales can further help advance conceptual understanding of the measurement in sport and exercise.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
2021-12-30T18:45:09Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/19248
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/19248
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1007/s11135-020-00988-6
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833600620436652032