Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Chromoscopy Versus Conventional Endoscopy for the Detection of Polyps in the Colon and Rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD006439
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2016 |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7968 |
Summary: | Although colonoscopy is considered the most accurate test for the investigation of colorectal polyps, lesions ≤ 10 mm may be missed in approximately 10%. Chromoscopy may increase the detection of colorectal polyps. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the benefit of cromoscopy in colorectal polyps detection. Seven randomized controlled trials were included (incuding 2,727 participants) comparing polyp detection (both neoplastic and non- neoplastic polyps) in patients submitted to conventional colonoscopy or colonoscopy with chromoscopy. Chromoscopy was associated with a significant improvement in all detection endpoints (number of polyps, number of neoplastic polyps, number of diminutive polyps, number of neoplastic diminutive polyps, proportion of patients with at least one polyp and proportion of patients with at least one neoplastic polyp). However, when highdefinition colonoscopes were used in the control group, chromoscopy benefit does not seem to be significant. Besides, routine use of chromoscopy may have implications in the accessibility of colonoscopy and in the effectiveness of screening programs. Moreover, the benefit of chromoscopy in the era of high-definition colonoscopy is questionable. |
id |
RCAP_17c99278dc84b7cf8b1b79d3aa7d7dad |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7968 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Chromoscopy Versus Conventional Endoscopy for the Detection of Polyps in the Colon and Rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD006439Análise da Revisão Cochrane: Cromoscopia Versus Colonoscopia Convencional na Deteção de Pólipos ColoRetais. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD006439Colonic Polyps/diagnosisColonoscopyIndicators and ReagentsIndigo CarmineIntestinal Polyps/diagnosisPrecancerous Conditions/diagnosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRectal Diseases/diagnosis.ColonoscopiaDoenças Retais/diagnósticoIndicadores e ReagentesÍndigo CarmimLesões Pré-Cancerosas/ diagnósticoPólipos do Colon/diagnósticoPólipos Intestinais/diagnósticoRevisão Sistemática.Although colonoscopy is considered the most accurate test for the investigation of colorectal polyps, lesions ≤ 10 mm may be missed in approximately 10%. Chromoscopy may increase the detection of colorectal polyps. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the benefit of cromoscopy in colorectal polyps detection. Seven randomized controlled trials were included (incuding 2,727 participants) comparing polyp detection (both neoplastic and non- neoplastic polyps) in patients submitted to conventional colonoscopy or colonoscopy with chromoscopy. Chromoscopy was associated with a significant improvement in all detection endpoints (number of polyps, number of neoplastic polyps, number of diminutive polyps, number of neoplastic diminutive polyps, proportion of patients with at least one polyp and proportion of patients with at least one neoplastic polyp). However, when highdefinition colonoscopes were used in the control group, chromoscopy benefit does not seem to be significant. Besides, routine use of chromoscopy may have implications in the accessibility of colonoscopy and in the effectiveness of screening programs. Moreover, the benefit of chromoscopy in the era of high-definition colonoscopy is questionable.Apesar de a colonoscopia convencional ser considerada o exame com maior acuidade para o diagnóstico de pólipos colo-retais, lesões com ≤ 10 mm podem ser falhadas em aproximadamente 10% dos casos. A cromoscopia pode melhorar a deteção de pólipos colo-retais. Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática e meta-análise para avaliar o benefício da cromoscopia na deteção de pólipos colo-retais. Foram incluídos sete ensaios clínicos aleatorizados (incluindo 2 727 participantes) que compararam a deteção de pólipos (neoplásicos e não-neoplásicos) em doentes submetidos a colonoscopia convencional ou a colonoscopia com cromoscopia. A cromoscopia associou-se a uma melhoria significativa nos vários endpoints de deteção (número de pólipos, número de pólipos neoplásicos, número de pólipos diminutos, número de pólipos neoplásicos diminutos, proporção de doentes com pelo menos um pólipo e proporção de doentes com pelo menos um pólipo neoplásico). Contudo, quando a colonoscopia no grupo de controlo foi efetuada com colonoscópios de alta definição, o benefício da cromoscopia parece não ser significativo. Além disso, o uso rotineiro da cromoscopia pode ter implicações na acessibilidade da colonoscopia e na efetividade dos programas de rastreio, questionando-se ainda o benefício da cromoscopia na era da colonoscopia de alta definição.Ordem dos Médicos2016-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7968oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7968Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 29 No. 10 (2016): October; 583-586Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 29 N.º 10 (2016): Outubro; 583-5861646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7968https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7968/4780https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7968/8805Direitos de Autor (c) 2016 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLibânio, DiogoAzevedo, Luís Filipe2022-12-20T11:05:22Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7968Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T10:40:54.536239Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Chromoscopy Versus Conventional Endoscopy for the Detection of Polyps in the Colon and Rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD006439 Análise da Revisão Cochrane: Cromoscopia Versus Colonoscopia Convencional na Deteção de Pólipos ColoRetais. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD006439 |
title |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Chromoscopy Versus Conventional Endoscopy for the Detection of Polyps in the Colon and Rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD006439 |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Chromoscopy Versus Conventional Endoscopy for the Detection of Polyps in the Colon and Rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD006439 Libânio, Diogo Colonic Polyps/diagnosis Colonoscopy Indicators and Reagents Indigo Carmine Intestinal Polyps/diagnosis Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Rectal Diseases/diagnosis. Colonoscopia Doenças Retais/diagnóstico Indicadores e Reagentes Índigo Carmim Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/ diagnóstico Pólipos do Colon/diagnóstico Pólipos Intestinais/diagnóstico Revisão Sistemática. |
title_short |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Chromoscopy Versus Conventional Endoscopy for the Detection of Polyps in the Colon and Rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD006439 |
title_full |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Chromoscopy Versus Conventional Endoscopy for the Detection of Polyps in the Colon and Rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD006439 |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Chromoscopy Versus Conventional Endoscopy for the Detection of Polyps in the Colon and Rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD006439 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Chromoscopy Versus Conventional Endoscopy for the Detection of Polyps in the Colon and Rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD006439 |
title_sort |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Chromoscopy Versus Conventional Endoscopy for the Detection of Polyps in the Colon and Rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD006439 |
author |
Libânio, Diogo |
author_facet |
Libânio, Diogo Azevedo, Luís Filipe |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Azevedo, Luís Filipe |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Libânio, Diogo Azevedo, Luís Filipe |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Colonic Polyps/diagnosis Colonoscopy Indicators and Reagents Indigo Carmine Intestinal Polyps/diagnosis Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Rectal Diseases/diagnosis. Colonoscopia Doenças Retais/diagnóstico Indicadores e Reagentes Índigo Carmim Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/ diagnóstico Pólipos do Colon/diagnóstico Pólipos Intestinais/diagnóstico Revisão Sistemática. |
topic |
Colonic Polyps/diagnosis Colonoscopy Indicators and Reagents Indigo Carmine Intestinal Polyps/diagnosis Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Rectal Diseases/diagnosis. Colonoscopia Doenças Retais/diagnóstico Indicadores e Reagentes Índigo Carmim Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/ diagnóstico Pólipos do Colon/diagnóstico Pólipos Intestinais/diagnóstico Revisão Sistemática. |
description |
Although colonoscopy is considered the most accurate test for the investigation of colorectal polyps, lesions ≤ 10 mm may be missed in approximately 10%. Chromoscopy may increase the detection of colorectal polyps. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the benefit of cromoscopy in colorectal polyps detection. Seven randomized controlled trials were included (incuding 2,727 participants) comparing polyp detection (both neoplastic and non- neoplastic polyps) in patients submitted to conventional colonoscopy or colonoscopy with chromoscopy. Chromoscopy was associated with a significant improvement in all detection endpoints (number of polyps, number of neoplastic polyps, number of diminutive polyps, number of neoplastic diminutive polyps, proportion of patients with at least one polyp and proportion of patients with at least one neoplastic polyp). However, when highdefinition colonoscopes were used in the control group, chromoscopy benefit does not seem to be significant. Besides, routine use of chromoscopy may have implications in the accessibility of colonoscopy and in the effectiveness of screening programs. Moreover, the benefit of chromoscopy in the era of high-definition colonoscopy is questionable. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-31 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7968 oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7968 |
url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7968 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7968 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7968 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7968/4780 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7968/8805 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2016 Acta Médica Portuguesa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2016 Acta Médica Portuguesa |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 29 No. 10 (2016): October; 583-586 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 29 N.º 10 (2016): Outubro; 583-586 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833591119417442304 |