Confiscation as one of the methods ro protect intellectual property rights

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Olexander, Svitlychnyy
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Nataliia, Myronenko, Inna, Voroshylova, Sergii Yurko, Sergii, Myrza, Svetlana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito
Texto Completo: https://seer.atitus.edu.br/index.php/revistadedireito/article/view/4916
Resumo: It is well-known fact that products and goods produced with the usage of the object of intellectual property rights has additional demand, bring additional profits to their right holders, and as a result such goods often become the object of offenses. It has been indicated that, taking into account the unsatisfactory situation of intellectual property protection and the problems of the state system of intellectual property, Ukraine, like the entire civilized world, pays attention to ensuring private and public interests in the field of intellectual property. The authors of the article have analyzed the situation of legal protection and have paid attention to the measures taken by Ukraine to reform the state system of intellectual property. It has been established that social relations in the researched area concern criminal and administrative legal mechanisms related to seizing. It has been emphasized that different types of fines, criminal or administrative confiscation are applied to the violator depending on the violation of the legal norm. The authors have analyzed national and foreign regulatory legal acts, where attention is focused on one of the types of penalty – confiscation. The shortcomings of the Ukrainian legislation have been pointed out and amendments to it have been offered for the purpose of its improvement.
id IMED-3_80734909b43253fbedf8e1609a6fb0bc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.imed1.tempsite.ws:article/4916
network_acronym_str IMED-3
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito
repository_id_str
spelling Confiscation as one of the methods ro protect intellectual property rightsConfiscação como um dos métodos para proteger os direitos de propriedade intelectualProtection; liability for infringement of intellectual property rights; trademark; legal prohibition; systematization of legislation; quality of legislation; improvement of legislationProteção; responsabilidade por violação de direitos de propriedade intelectual; marca; proibição legal; sistematização da legislação; qualidade da legislação; aperfeiçoamento da legislaçãoIt is well-known fact that products and goods produced with the usage of the object of intellectual property rights has additional demand, bring additional profits to their right holders, and as a result such goods often become the object of offenses. It has been indicated that, taking into account the unsatisfactory situation of intellectual property protection and the problems of the state system of intellectual property, Ukraine, like the entire civilized world, pays attention to ensuring private and public interests in the field of intellectual property. The authors of the article have analyzed the situation of legal protection and have paid attention to the measures taken by Ukraine to reform the state system of intellectual property. It has been established that social relations in the researched area concern criminal and administrative legal mechanisms related to seizing. It has been emphasized that different types of fines, criminal or administrative confiscation are applied to the violator depending on the violation of the legal norm. The authors have analyzed national and foreign regulatory legal acts, where attention is focused on one of the types of penalty – confiscation. The shortcomings of the Ukrainian legislation have been pointed out and amendments to it have been offered for the purpose of its improvement.É sabido que produtos e bens produzidos com a utilização do objeto de direitos de propriedade intelectual têm demanda adicional, trazem lucros adicionais aos seus titulares de direitos e, como resultado, tais bens muitas vezes tornam-se objeto de infrações. Foi indicado que, tendo em conta a situação insatisfatória da protecção da propriedade intelectual e os problemas do sistema estatal de propriedade intelectual, a Ucrânia, como todo o mundo civilizado, está atenta à garantia dos interesses públicos e privados no domínio da propriedade intelectual. Os autores do artigo analisaram a situação da protecção jurídica e prestaram atenção às medidas tomadas pela Ucrânia para reformar o sistema estatal de propriedade intelectual. Foi estabelecido que as relações sociais na área pesquisada dizem respeito aos mecanismos jurídicos criminais e administrativos relacionados à apreensão. Enfatizou-se que diferentes tipos de multas, confiscos criminais ou administrativos são aplicados ao infrator dependendo da violação da norma legal. Os autores analisaram atos jurídicos regulamentares nacionais e estrangeiros, onde a atenção se centra num dos tipos de pena – o confisco. Foram apontadas as deficiências da legislação ucraniana e propostas alterações à mesma com o objectivo de a melhorar.Complexo de Ensino Superior Meridional S.A.Olexander, SvitlychnyyNataliia, MyronenkoInna, VoroshylovaSergii Yurko, SergiiMyrza, Svetlana2023-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.atitus.edu.br/index.php/revistadedireito/article/view/491610.18256/2238-0604.2023.v19i1.4916Revista Brasileira de Direito; v. 19, n. 1 (2023): RBD. Jan.-Abril./2023; e4916Revista Brasileira de Direito; v. 19, n. 1 (2023): RBD. Jan.-Abril./2023; e4916Revista Brasileira de Direito; v. 19, n. 1 (2023): RBD. Jan.-Abril./2023; e4916Revista Brasileira de Direito; v. 19, n. 1 (2023): RBD. Jan.-Abril./2023; e4916Revista Brasileira de Direito; v. 19, n. 1 (2023): RBD. Jan.-Abril./2023; e4916Revista Brasileira de Direito; v. 19, n. 1 (2023): RBD. Jan.-Abril./2023; e49162238-06042238-060410.18256/2238-0604.2023.v19i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direitoinstname:Faculdade Meridional (IMED)instacron:IMEDenghttps://seer.atitus.edu.br/index.php/revistadedireito/article/view/4916/3212/*ref*/ANDROSHCHUK, Hennadii. USTR publishes the annual Special Report 301 on the protection of intellectual property. Legal newspaper, 26 May 2021. Available at: https://yur-gazeta.com/golovna/ustr-publikue-richniy-specialniy-zvit-301-pro-zahist-intelektualnoyi-vlasnosti.html. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/BAKONINA, Olena. The Constitutional Court confirmed the constitutionality of provisions on special confiscation. Jurliga. June 30, 2022. Available at: https://jurliga.ligazakon.net/news/212232_konstitutsyniy-sud-pdtverdiv-konstitutsynst-polozhen-pro-spetsalnu-konfskatsyu. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/BARANOV, Alexander et al. Mechanism of state economic security management in the direction of intellectual property rights protection: Сases of selected industries. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, v. 10. no. 1, p. 19-34, 2020./*ref*/BARKHATOVA, Natalia. The Archpole design bureau accused Sheremetyevo of plagiarizing furniture. RB.RU. January 2020. Available at: https://rb.ru/news/archpole-sheremetevo/. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/BELGIUM. Council of State. House if Representatives. Criminal Code of Belgium of August 21, 2021. Available at: https://legislationline.org/sites/default/files/documents/6e/BELG_CC_fr.pdf. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/BILOUSOVA, Nina et al. Intellectual property and patent science. Kyiv: KPI named after Igor Sikorskyi, Polytechnic Publishing House, 2021./*ref*/COUNCIL OF EUROPE. Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of Terrorism of May 16, 2005. Available at: https://zakon. rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/994_948?find=1&text# =конфіскація#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/GUSAROV, Serhii. Certain aspects of state service reform. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, v. 28. no. 1, p. 14-25, 2020./*ref*/IVASHOVA, Liudmyla; ANTONOVA, Liudmyla; IVASHOV, Mykhailo. The institutional mechanism for the protection of intellectual property rights in the context of Ukraine’s integration into the EU. Public administration and customs administration, v. 4. no. 35, p. 39-49, 2022./*ref*/KOROTUN, Olena. Administrative and legal protection of intellectual property in Ukraine. 2020. Dissertation (D.Sc. in Law). Kyiv./*ref*/KULCHYTSKYI, Nazar; SLIUSAR, Andrii. Well, a very special confiscation. Legal Gazette. July 2, 2020. Available at: https://vkp.ua/publication/nu-duzhe-spetsialna-konfiskatsiya. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/LEBEDIEVA, Ganna. Protection of the rights and interests of individuals violated as a result of the use of objects of intellectual property law. 2021. Dissertation (D.Sc.). Odesa./*ref*/LISOVYI, Artem. Prevention of copyright violations on the Internet. 2021. Dissertation (PhD in Law). Kyiv./*ref*/MERNYK, Anastasiia. Control of observance of human rights during their restrictions in the conditions of special legal regimes. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, v. 30. no. 1, pp. 31-43, 2023./*ref*/ORTYNSKA, Mariia. The way to protect intellectual property within criminal proceedings and factors that can prevent this. Law and Business, v. 25-26, pp. 1375-1376, 2018. Available at: https://zib.com.ua/ru/print/133501-kak_zaschitit_intellektualnuyu_sobstvennost_v_ugolovnom_proc.html. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/PETRYSHYN, Oleksandr; PETRYSHYN, Oleh; HYLIAKA, Oleh. The problem of non-implementation of judgements of the European Court of Human Rights in Ukraine in the context of the rule of law (methodological and comparanive aspects). Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, v. 28. no. 2, pp. 17-24, 2021./*ref*/RABINOVYCH, Petro; DUDASH, Tamara. Legal argumentation: Some general theoretical aspects. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, v. 29. no. 1, pp. 13-25, 2022./*ref*/SHMORGUN, Vyacheslav. Administrative and legal protection of means of individualization of participants in economic turnover, goods and services. 2020. Dissertation (PhD in Law). Kyiv./*ref*/SOLOVE, Daniel J. The Myth of the Privacy Paradox. The George Washington law review. Washington, v. 89. no. 1, p. 51, 2021./*ref*/TEREMETSKYI, Vladyslav et al. Features of legal protection of medical inventions: present and future. Pathologia, v. 16, n. 3(47), p. 417-423, 2019. https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2019.3.188972/*ref*/TEREMETSKYI, Vladyslav; AVRAMOVA Olga; ANDRIIV Vasyl. Risks of Deprivation of the Ownership Right by the Examples of The Nationalization and Re-Privatization. Journal of Law and Political Sciences, v. 23, n. 2/C, p. 83-103, 2020. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/15r3HAXqJ7Mow4-jaoLcBKZo8hEeL_xJY/view/. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/UKRAINE. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Order No. 943 «Some issues of the National Intellectual Property Authority» of October 28, 2022). Available at: https://zakononline.com.ua/ documents/ show/511765708995. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/UKRAINE. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Resolution No. 179 «National economic strategy for the period until 2030» of March 10, 2021. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/179-2021-р. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/UKRAINE. The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court. Decision in case No. 400/548/19 of April 18, 2020). Available at: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/88952401. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses of December 7, 1984. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Constitution of Ukraine of June 28, 1996. Available at: https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/constitution. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Criminal Code of Ukraine of April 5, 2001. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Customs Code of Ukraine of March 13, 2012. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4495-17#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine No. 2974 «On amendments to some legislative acts of Ukraine regarding strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights» of March 20, 2023. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2974-20#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine No. 981-VIII «On the adoption of the Protocol on Amendments to the TRIPS Agreement» of February 3, 2016. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/981-19#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine No. 703-IX «On amendments to some laws of Ukraine regarding the creation of a national intellectual property body» of January 1, 2023. Available at: https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/703-20#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002./*ref*/WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. Agreement on trade aspects of intellectual property rights of April 15, 1994. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/981_018#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.Direitos autorais 2023 Revista Brasileira de Direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-09T18:42:27Zoai:ojs.imed1.tempsite.ws:article/4916Revistahttps://seer.atitus.edu.br/index.php/revistadedireitoPRIhttps://seer.atitus.edu.br/index.php/revistadedireito/oaifausto.morais@atitus.edu.br2238-06041807-1228opendoar:2024-04-09T18:42:27Revista Brasileira de Direito - Faculdade Meridional (IMED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Confiscation as one of the methods ro protect intellectual property rights
Confiscação como um dos métodos para proteger os direitos de propriedade intelectual
title Confiscation as one of the methods ro protect intellectual property rights
spellingShingle Confiscation as one of the methods ro protect intellectual property rights
Olexander, Svitlychnyy
Protection; liability for infringement of intellectual property rights; trademark; legal prohibition; systematization of legislation; quality of legislation; improvement of legislation
Proteção; responsabilidade por violação de direitos de propriedade intelectual; marca; proibição legal; sistematização da legislação; qualidade da legislação; aperfeiçoamento da legislação
title_short Confiscation as one of the methods ro protect intellectual property rights
title_full Confiscation as one of the methods ro protect intellectual property rights
title_fullStr Confiscation as one of the methods ro protect intellectual property rights
title_full_unstemmed Confiscation as one of the methods ro protect intellectual property rights
title_sort Confiscation as one of the methods ro protect intellectual property rights
author Olexander, Svitlychnyy
author_facet Olexander, Svitlychnyy
Nataliia, Myronenko
Inna, Voroshylova
Sergii Yurko, Sergii
Myrza, Svetlana
author_role author
author2 Nataliia, Myronenko
Inna, Voroshylova
Sergii Yurko, Sergii
Myrza, Svetlana
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Olexander, Svitlychnyy
Nataliia, Myronenko
Inna, Voroshylova
Sergii Yurko, Sergii
Myrza, Svetlana
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv

dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Protection; liability for infringement of intellectual property rights; trademark; legal prohibition; systematization of legislation; quality of legislation; improvement of legislation
Proteção; responsabilidade por violação de direitos de propriedade intelectual; marca; proibição legal; sistematização da legislação; qualidade da legislação; aperfeiçoamento da legislação
topic Protection; liability for infringement of intellectual property rights; trademark; legal prohibition; systematization of legislation; quality of legislation; improvement of legislation
Proteção; responsabilidade por violação de direitos de propriedade intelectual; marca; proibição legal; sistematização da legislação; qualidade da legislação; aperfeiçoamento da legislação
description It is well-known fact that products and goods produced with the usage of the object of intellectual property rights has additional demand, bring additional profits to their right holders, and as a result such goods often become the object of offenses. It has been indicated that, taking into account the unsatisfactory situation of intellectual property protection and the problems of the state system of intellectual property, Ukraine, like the entire civilized world, pays attention to ensuring private and public interests in the field of intellectual property. The authors of the article have analyzed the situation of legal protection and have paid attention to the measures taken by Ukraine to reform the state system of intellectual property. It has been established that social relations in the researched area concern criminal and administrative legal mechanisms related to seizing. It has been emphasized that different types of fines, criminal or administrative confiscation are applied to the violator depending on the violation of the legal norm. The authors have analyzed national and foreign regulatory legal acts, where attention is focused on one of the types of penalty – confiscation. The shortcomings of the Ukrainian legislation have been pointed out and amendments to it have been offered for the purpose of its improvement.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-31
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.atitus.edu.br/index.php/revistadedireito/article/view/4916
10.18256/2238-0604.2023.v19i1.4916
url https://seer.atitus.edu.br/index.php/revistadedireito/article/view/4916
identifier_str_mv 10.18256/2238-0604.2023.v19i1.4916
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.atitus.edu.br/index.php/revistadedireito/article/view/4916/3212
/*ref*/ANDROSHCHUK, Hennadii. USTR publishes the annual Special Report 301 on the protection of intellectual property. Legal newspaper, 26 May 2021. Available at: https://yur-gazeta.com/golovna/ustr-publikue-richniy-specialniy-zvit-301-pro-zahist-intelektualnoyi-vlasnosti.html. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/BAKONINA, Olena. The Constitutional Court confirmed the constitutionality of provisions on special confiscation. Jurliga. June 30, 2022. Available at: https://jurliga.ligazakon.net/news/212232_konstitutsyniy-sud-pdtverdiv-konstitutsynst-polozhen-pro-spetsalnu-konfskatsyu. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/BARANOV, Alexander et al. Mechanism of state economic security management in the direction of intellectual property rights protection: Сases of selected industries. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, v. 10. no. 1, p. 19-34, 2020.
/*ref*/BARKHATOVA, Natalia. The Archpole design bureau accused Sheremetyevo of plagiarizing furniture. RB.RU. January 2020. Available at: https://rb.ru/news/archpole-sheremetevo/. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/BELGIUM. Council of State. House if Representatives. Criminal Code of Belgium of August 21, 2021. Available at: https://legislationline.org/sites/default/files/documents/6e/BELG_CC_fr.pdf. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/BILOUSOVA, Nina et al. Intellectual property and patent science. Kyiv: KPI named after Igor Sikorskyi, Polytechnic Publishing House, 2021.
/*ref*/COUNCIL OF EUROPE. Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of Terrorism of May 16, 2005. Available at: https://zakon. rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/994_948?find=1&text# =конфіскація#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/GUSAROV, Serhii. Certain aspects of state service reform. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, v. 28. no. 1, p. 14-25, 2020.
/*ref*/IVASHOVA, Liudmyla; ANTONOVA, Liudmyla; IVASHOV, Mykhailo. The institutional mechanism for the protection of intellectual property rights in the context of Ukraine’s integration into the EU. Public administration and customs administration, v. 4. no. 35, p. 39-49, 2022.
/*ref*/KOROTUN, Olena. Administrative and legal protection of intellectual property in Ukraine. 2020. Dissertation (D.Sc. in Law). Kyiv.
/*ref*/KULCHYTSKYI, Nazar; SLIUSAR, Andrii. Well, a very special confiscation. Legal Gazette. July 2, 2020. Available at: https://vkp.ua/publication/nu-duzhe-spetsialna-konfiskatsiya. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/LEBEDIEVA, Ganna. Protection of the rights and interests of individuals violated as a result of the use of objects of intellectual property law. 2021. Dissertation (D.Sc.). Odesa.
/*ref*/LISOVYI, Artem. Prevention of copyright violations on the Internet. 2021. Dissertation (PhD in Law). Kyiv.
/*ref*/MERNYK, Anastasiia. Control of observance of human rights during their restrictions in the conditions of special legal regimes. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, v. 30. no. 1, pp. 31-43, 2023.
/*ref*/ORTYNSKA, Mariia. The way to protect intellectual property within criminal proceedings and factors that can prevent this. Law and Business, v. 25-26, pp. 1375-1376, 2018. Available at: https://zib.com.ua/ru/print/133501-kak_zaschitit_intellektualnuyu_sobstvennost_v_ugolovnom_proc.html. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/PETRYSHYN, Oleksandr; PETRYSHYN, Oleh; HYLIAKA, Oleh. The problem of non-implementation of judgements of the European Court of Human Rights in Ukraine in the context of the rule of law (methodological and comparanive aspects). Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, v. 28. no. 2, pp. 17-24, 2021.
/*ref*/RABINOVYCH, Petro; DUDASH, Tamara. Legal argumentation: Some general theoretical aspects. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, v. 29. no. 1, pp. 13-25, 2022.
/*ref*/SHMORGUN, Vyacheslav. Administrative and legal protection of means of individualization of participants in economic turnover, goods and services. 2020. Dissertation (PhD in Law). Kyiv.
/*ref*/SOLOVE, Daniel J. The Myth of the Privacy Paradox. The George Washington law review. Washington, v. 89. no. 1, p. 51, 2021.
/*ref*/TEREMETSKYI, Vladyslav et al. Features of legal protection of medical inventions: present and future. Pathologia, v. 16, n. 3(47), p. 417-423, 2019. https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2019.3.188972
/*ref*/TEREMETSKYI, Vladyslav; AVRAMOVA Olga; ANDRIIV Vasyl. Risks of Deprivation of the Ownership Right by the Examples of The Nationalization and Re-Privatization. Journal of Law and Political Sciences, v. 23, n. 2/C, p. 83-103, 2020. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/15r3HAXqJ7Mow4-jaoLcBKZo8hEeL_xJY/view/. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/UKRAINE. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Order No. 943 «Some issues of the National Intellectual Property Authority» of October 28, 2022). Available at: https://zakononline.com.ua/ documents/ show/511765708995. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/UKRAINE. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Resolution No. 179 «National economic strategy for the period until 2030» of March 10, 2021. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/179-2021-р. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/UKRAINE. The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court. Decision in case No. 400/548/19 of April 18, 2020). Available at: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/88952401. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses of December 7, 1984. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Constitution of Ukraine of June 28, 1996. Available at: https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/constitution. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Criminal Code of Ukraine of April 5, 2001. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Customs Code of Ukraine of March 13, 2012. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4495-17#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine No. 2974 «On amendments to some legislative acts of Ukraine regarding strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights» of March 20, 2023. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2974-20#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine No. 981-VIII «On the adoption of the Protocol on Amendments to the TRIPS Agreement» of February 3, 2016. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/981-19#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine No. 703-IX «On amendments to some laws of Ukraine regarding the creation of a national intellectual property body» of January 1, 2023. Available at: https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/703-20#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
/*ref*/WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. Agreement on trade aspects of intellectual property rights of April 15, 1994. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/981_018#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2023 Revista Brasileira de Direito
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2023 Revista Brasileira de Direito
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Complexo de Ensino Superior Meridional S.A.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Complexo de Ensino Superior Meridional S.A.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito; v. 19, n. 1 (2023): RBD. Jan.-Abril./2023; e4916
Revista Brasileira de Direito; v. 19, n. 1 (2023): RBD. Jan.-Abril./2023; e4916
Revista Brasileira de Direito; v. 19, n. 1 (2023): RBD. Jan.-Abril./2023; e4916
Revista Brasileira de Direito; v. 19, n. 1 (2023): RBD. Jan.-Abril./2023; e4916
Revista Brasileira de Direito; v. 19, n. 1 (2023): RBD. Jan.-Abril./2023; e4916
Revista Brasileira de Direito; v. 19, n. 1 (2023): RBD. Jan.-Abril./2023; e4916
2238-0604
2238-0604
10.18256/2238-0604.2023.v19i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito
instname:Faculdade Meridional (IMED)
instacron:IMED
instname_str Faculdade Meridional (IMED)
instacron_str IMED
institution IMED
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito - Faculdade Meridional (IMED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fausto.morais@atitus.edu.br
_version_ 1836740215912267776

Registros relacionados