Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Duarte-Filho,Oscar Barbosa
Publication Date: 2021
Other Authors: Podgaec,Sérgio
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Einstein (São Paulo)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082021000100238
Summary: ABSTRACT Objective To answer the question if the freeze-all strategy and subsequent frozen embryo transfer is preferable to fresh embryo transfer for patients with normal response to ovarian stimulation (4 to 15 oocytes recovered) during in vitro fertilization treatments. Methods A retrospective cohort from two human reproduction centers between 2013 and 2017. A total of 471 frozen embryo transfers from freeze-all cycles, and 3,208 fresh transfers were included. Results After propensity score matching adjustment for age and number of eggs, 467 freeze-all cycles and 934 fresh cycles were analyzed, revealing no statistically significant difference between groups in relation to clinical pregnancy rate (32.5% in the Freeze-all Group and 32.3% in the Fresh Group, p=0.936). For women aged 40 years and older, we observed a statistically significant higher clinical pregnancy rate when freeze-all strategy was used (29.3% in the Freeze-all Group and 19.8% in the Fresh Group, p=0.04). Conclusion Freeze-all strategy was not superior to fresh transfer for all patients with normal response to ovarian stimulation. However, women aged 40 years and older could benefit from this strategy. This deserves further investigation in future research, preferable in a prospective randomized study.
id IIEPAE-1_bac31da84d72a59663b2bde788b9e795
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1679-45082021000100238
network_acronym_str IIEPAE-1
network_name_str Einstein (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulationFertilization in vitroOvulation inductionEmbryo transferCryopreservationVitrificationABSTRACT Objective To answer the question if the freeze-all strategy and subsequent frozen embryo transfer is preferable to fresh embryo transfer for patients with normal response to ovarian stimulation (4 to 15 oocytes recovered) during in vitro fertilization treatments. Methods A retrospective cohort from two human reproduction centers between 2013 and 2017. A total of 471 frozen embryo transfers from freeze-all cycles, and 3,208 fresh transfers were included. Results After propensity score matching adjustment for age and number of eggs, 467 freeze-all cycles and 934 fresh cycles were analyzed, revealing no statistically significant difference between groups in relation to clinical pregnancy rate (32.5% in the Freeze-all Group and 32.3% in the Fresh Group, p=0.936). For women aged 40 years and older, we observed a statistically significant higher clinical pregnancy rate when freeze-all strategy was used (29.3% in the Freeze-all Group and 19.8% in the Fresh Group, p=0.04). Conclusion Freeze-all strategy was not superior to fresh transfer for all patients with normal response to ovarian stimulation. However, women aged 40 years and older could benefit from this strategy. This deserves further investigation in future research, preferable in a prospective randomized study.Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082021000100238einstein (São Paulo) v.19 2021reponame:Einstein (São Paulo)instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)instacron:IIEPAE10.31744/einstein_journal/2021ao6290info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDuarte-Filho,Oscar BarbosaPodgaec,Sérgioeng2021-10-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1679-45082021000100238Revistahttps://journal.einstein.br/pt-br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@einstein.br2317-63851679-4508opendoar:2021-10-08T00:00Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation
title Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation
spellingShingle Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation
Duarte-Filho,Oscar Barbosa
Fertilization in vitro
Ovulation induction
Embryo transfer
Cryopreservation
Vitrification
title_short Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation
title_full Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation
title_fullStr Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation
title_sort Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation
author Duarte-Filho,Oscar Barbosa
author_facet Duarte-Filho,Oscar Barbosa
Podgaec,Sérgio
author_role author
author2 Podgaec,Sérgio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Duarte-Filho,Oscar Barbosa
Podgaec,Sérgio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fertilization in vitro
Ovulation induction
Embryo transfer
Cryopreservation
Vitrification
topic Fertilization in vitro
Ovulation induction
Embryo transfer
Cryopreservation
Vitrification
description ABSTRACT Objective To answer the question if the freeze-all strategy and subsequent frozen embryo transfer is preferable to fresh embryo transfer for patients with normal response to ovarian stimulation (4 to 15 oocytes recovered) during in vitro fertilization treatments. Methods A retrospective cohort from two human reproduction centers between 2013 and 2017. A total of 471 frozen embryo transfers from freeze-all cycles, and 3,208 fresh transfers were included. Results After propensity score matching adjustment for age and number of eggs, 467 freeze-all cycles and 934 fresh cycles were analyzed, revealing no statistically significant difference between groups in relation to clinical pregnancy rate (32.5% in the Freeze-all Group and 32.3% in the Fresh Group, p=0.936). For women aged 40 years and older, we observed a statistically significant higher clinical pregnancy rate when freeze-all strategy was used (29.3% in the Freeze-all Group and 19.8% in the Fresh Group, p=0.04). Conclusion Freeze-all strategy was not superior to fresh transfer for all patients with normal response to ovarian stimulation. However, women aged 40 years and older could benefit from this strategy. This deserves further investigation in future research, preferable in a prospective randomized study.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082021000100238
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082021000100238
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.31744/einstein_journal/2021ao6290
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv einstein (São Paulo) v.19 2021
reponame:Einstein (São Paulo)
instname:Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)
instacron:IIEPAE
instname_str Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)
instacron_str IIEPAE
institution IIEPAE
reponame_str Einstein (São Paulo)
collection Einstein (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Einstein (São Paulo) - Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein (IIEPAE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista@einstein.br
_version_ 1752129910595387392