Export Ready — 

Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: El-Anwar,Mohammad Waheed
Publication Date: 2016
Other Authors: ElAassar,Ahmed Shaker, Foad,Yaser Ahmad
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642016000200180
Summary: Abstract Introduction Posterior tympanotomy approach for cochlear implant (CI) surgery, has been the most commonly used worldwide with current 0.7% rate of facial nerve injury. Non-mastoidectomy CI approaches include the suprameatal approach (SMA) and its modifications, the transcanal approach and its modifications and the pericanal approach for electrode insertion. Objectives The objective of this study was to review the literature regarding nonmastoidectomy CI approaches. Data Synthesis A search was performed in the LILACS, MEDLINE, SciELO, PubMed databases and Cochrane Library in February 2015, and the key words used in the search were CI, SMA, transcanal approach, pericanal approach, or electrode extrusion. About 30 studies that met the criteria described in "Study Selection" were read in full. The studies showed 1014 patients that underwent CI by SMA or its modifications, 266 CI patients treated by transcanal approach or its modifications, and 15 patients implanted by the pericanal approach. Reported complication with SMA was 99 (9.8%) minor and 13 (1.3%) major. With transcanal, there were 24 complications; 19 (7.1%) minor and 5 (1.9%) major. No post-operative complication was reported in pericanal approach. Studies showed no reported facial nerve paresis or paralysis in all non-mastoidectomy approaches. Conclusion Complications rates with non-mastoidectomy approaches are similar to those found in the mastoidectomy approach. Thus, non-mastoidectomy approaches may be an alternative in cases where the conventional mastoidectomy approach is difficult to perform. It would be helpful for CI surgeons to become familiarized with these approaches.
id FORL-1_8f3fcf47bb0ba1d8677fea9bd77f4769
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1809-48642016000200180
network_acronym_str FORL-1
network_name_str International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
repository_id_str
spelling Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Reviewcochlear implantmastoidectomyfacial nerveAbstract Introduction Posterior tympanotomy approach for cochlear implant (CI) surgery, has been the most commonly used worldwide with current 0.7% rate of facial nerve injury. Non-mastoidectomy CI approaches include the suprameatal approach (SMA) and its modifications, the transcanal approach and its modifications and the pericanal approach for electrode insertion. Objectives The objective of this study was to review the literature regarding nonmastoidectomy CI approaches. Data Synthesis A search was performed in the LILACS, MEDLINE, SciELO, PubMed databases and Cochrane Library in February 2015, and the key words used in the search were CI, SMA, transcanal approach, pericanal approach, or electrode extrusion. About 30 studies that met the criteria described in "Study Selection" were read in full. The studies showed 1014 patients that underwent CI by SMA or its modifications, 266 CI patients treated by transcanal approach or its modifications, and 15 patients implanted by the pericanal approach. Reported complication with SMA was 99 (9.8%) minor and 13 (1.3%) major. With transcanal, there were 24 complications; 19 (7.1%) minor and 5 (1.9%) major. No post-operative complication was reported in pericanal approach. Studies showed no reported facial nerve paresis or paralysis in all non-mastoidectomy approaches. Conclusion Complications rates with non-mastoidectomy approaches are similar to those found in the mastoidectomy approach. Thus, non-mastoidectomy approaches may be an alternative in cases where the conventional mastoidectomy approach is difficult to perform. It would be helpful for CI surgeons to become familiarized with these approaches.Fundação Otorrinolaringologia2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642016000200180International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology v.20 n.2 2016reponame:International Archives of Otorhinolaryngologyinstname:Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)instacron:FORL10.1055/s-0035-1558871info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEl-Anwar,Mohammad WaheedElAassar,Ahmed ShakerFoad,Yaser Ahmadeng2016-07-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1809-48642016000200180Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/iao/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||iaorl@iaorl.org||archives@internationalarchivesent.org||arquivos@forl.org.br1809-48641809-4864opendoar:2016-07-08T00:00International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology - Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review
title Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review
spellingShingle Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review
El-Anwar,Mohammad Waheed
cochlear implant
mastoidectomy
facial nerve
title_short Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review
title_full Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review
title_fullStr Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review
title_sort Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review
author El-Anwar,Mohammad Waheed
author_facet El-Anwar,Mohammad Waheed
ElAassar,Ahmed Shaker
Foad,Yaser Ahmad
author_role author
author2 ElAassar,Ahmed Shaker
Foad,Yaser Ahmad
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv El-Anwar,Mohammad Waheed
ElAassar,Ahmed Shaker
Foad,Yaser Ahmad
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv cochlear implant
mastoidectomy
facial nerve
topic cochlear implant
mastoidectomy
facial nerve
description Abstract Introduction Posterior tympanotomy approach for cochlear implant (CI) surgery, has been the most commonly used worldwide with current 0.7% rate of facial nerve injury. Non-mastoidectomy CI approaches include the suprameatal approach (SMA) and its modifications, the transcanal approach and its modifications and the pericanal approach for electrode insertion. Objectives The objective of this study was to review the literature regarding nonmastoidectomy CI approaches. Data Synthesis A search was performed in the LILACS, MEDLINE, SciELO, PubMed databases and Cochrane Library in February 2015, and the key words used in the search were CI, SMA, transcanal approach, pericanal approach, or electrode extrusion. About 30 studies that met the criteria described in "Study Selection" were read in full. The studies showed 1014 patients that underwent CI by SMA or its modifications, 266 CI patients treated by transcanal approach or its modifications, and 15 patients implanted by the pericanal approach. Reported complication with SMA was 99 (9.8%) minor and 13 (1.3%) major. With transcanal, there were 24 complications; 19 (7.1%) minor and 5 (1.9%) major. No post-operative complication was reported in pericanal approach. Studies showed no reported facial nerve paresis or paralysis in all non-mastoidectomy approaches. Conclusion Complications rates with non-mastoidectomy approaches are similar to those found in the mastoidectomy approach. Thus, non-mastoidectomy approaches may be an alternative in cases where the conventional mastoidectomy approach is difficult to perform. It would be helpful for CI surgeons to become familiarized with these approaches.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642016000200180
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642016000200180
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0035-1558871
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Otorrinolaringologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Otorrinolaringologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology v.20 n.2 2016
reponame:International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
instname:Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
instacron:FORL
instname_str Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
instacron_str FORL
institution FORL
reponame_str International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
collection International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology - Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||iaorl@iaorl.org||archives@internationalarchivesent.org||arquivos@forl.org.br
_version_ 1754203975584841728