Risk Society, Bioethics and the Precautionary Principle

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Santos, Marcelo Pereira dos
Publication Date: 2015
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais
Download full: http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/29
Summary: The dynamics of medicine has causing great shiver in society, given the progress made in the context of biomedicine and genetic events that provided before thoughtless as the assisted reproduction techniques, therapeutic cloning, surgery for transmutation of sex, as well as focused clinical procedures prolonging life. These events do not occur without causing ethical dilemmas that require a reflection on the limits and degrees of acceptability in the methods and practices used by health professionals, biologists, scientists, pharmacists and others involved in the manipulation of genetic material and trials with humans. From this perspective, this paper, from the analytical assessment of the Bioethics paradigms, promotes the correlation between human dignity, scientific progress and rights of future generations under inflows arising from advances in science and technology in a society of risk and the ambivalence. The analysis of the issues is promoted with the use of dialectical-descriptive methodology, based on the literature about the above issues, involving books, articles, dissertations and theses published in the last ten years. The theoretical framework sits in the design of risks and ambivalences, outlined by Ulrich Beck, Franz Josef Brüseke, Anthony Giddens, Zygmunt Bauman. The study aims to understand the necessary effect bioethics of the precautionary principle as a guiding ethical beacon of scientific and technical progress and the necessary reconciliation between trials and legitimacy of choices for the maintenance and evolution of the human species.
id CONPEDI-3_cf6e4354d1dcc7b662563c24adfe5ca8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/29
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-3
network_name_str Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais
repository_id_str
spelling Risk Society, Bioethics and the Precautionary PrincipleSociedade de Risco, Bioética e Princípio da PrecauçãoRiskScienceBioethicsDignityCautionRiscosCiênciaBioéticaDignidadePrecauçãoThe dynamics of medicine has causing great shiver in society, given the progress made in the context of biomedicine and genetic events that provided before thoughtless as the assisted reproduction techniques, therapeutic cloning, surgery for transmutation of sex, as well as focused clinical procedures prolonging life. These events do not occur without causing ethical dilemmas that require a reflection on the limits and degrees of acceptability in the methods and practices used by health professionals, biologists, scientists, pharmacists and others involved in the manipulation of genetic material and trials with humans. From this perspective, this paper, from the analytical assessment of the Bioethics paradigms, promotes the correlation between human dignity, scientific progress and rights of future generations under inflows arising from advances in science and technology in a society of risk and the ambivalence. The analysis of the issues is promoted with the use of dialectical-descriptive methodology, based on the literature about the above issues, involving books, articles, dissertations and theses published in the last ten years. The theoretical framework sits in the design of risks and ambivalences, outlined by Ulrich Beck, Franz Josef Brüseke, Anthony Giddens, Zygmunt Bauman. The study aims to understand the necessary effect bioethics of the precautionary principle as a guiding ethical beacon of scientific and technical progress and the necessary reconciliation between trials and legitimacy of choices for the maintenance and evolution of the human species.A dinâmica da medicina tem provocando grande arrepio na sociedade, em virtude dos avanços alcançados no âmbito da biomedicina e da genética que proporcionaram eventos dantes impensados como as técnicas de reprodução assistida, clonagem terapêutica, cirurgias para transmutação de sexo, bem como dos procedimentos clínicos voltados ao prolongamento da vida. Esses eventos não se dão sem provocar dilemas éticos que impõem uma reflexão em torno dos limites e graus de aceitabilidade quanto aos métodos e práticas utilizados por profissionais da saúde, biólogos, cientistas, farmacêuticos dentre outros envolvidos na manipulação de material genético e experimentações com seres humanos. Nessa perspectiva, o presente ensaio, a partir da apreciação analítica dos paradigmas da Bioética, promove a correlação entre dignidade humana, progresso científico e direitos fundamentais das futuras gerações sob os influxos decorrentes dos avanços da ciência e da tecnologia numa sociedade caracterizada pelo risco e a ambivalência. A análise das questões suscitadas é promovida com a utilização da metodologia dialético-descritiva, consubstanciada na pesquisa bibliográfica em torno das questões supramencionadas, envolvendo livros, artigos, dissertações e teses publicadas nos dez últimos anos. O referencial teórico tem assento na concepção de riscos e ambivalências, delineados por Ulrich Beck, Franz Josef Brüseke, Anthony Giddens, Zygmunt Bauman. O estudo aponta a compreensão da necessária incidência bioética do princípio da precaução como farol ético norteador do progresso técnico-científico e a necessária conciliação entre experimentações e legitimidade das escolhas para a manutenção e evolução da espécie humana.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI2015-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/2910.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9695/2015.v1i1.29Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais; v. 1 n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 309 - 3282525-96952525-9695reponame:Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animaisinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/29/pdfCopyright (c) 2016 Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animaisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Marcelo Pereira dos2021-08-20T01:59:58Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/29Revistahttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbdaONGhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/oai||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-96952525-9695opendoar:2021-08-20T01:59:58Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Risk Society, Bioethics and the Precautionary Principle
Sociedade de Risco, Bioética e Princípio da Precaução
title Risk Society, Bioethics and the Precautionary Principle
spellingShingle Risk Society, Bioethics and the Precautionary Principle
Santos, Marcelo Pereira dos
Risk
Science
Bioethics
Dignity
Caution
Riscos
Ciência
Bioética
Dignidade
Precaução
title_short Risk Society, Bioethics and the Precautionary Principle
title_full Risk Society, Bioethics and the Precautionary Principle
title_fullStr Risk Society, Bioethics and the Precautionary Principle
title_full_unstemmed Risk Society, Bioethics and the Precautionary Principle
title_sort Risk Society, Bioethics and the Precautionary Principle
author Santos, Marcelo Pereira dos
author_facet Santos, Marcelo Pereira dos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Marcelo Pereira dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Risk
Science
Bioethics
Dignity
Caution
Riscos
Ciência
Bioética
Dignidade
Precaução
topic Risk
Science
Bioethics
Dignity
Caution
Riscos
Ciência
Bioética
Dignidade
Precaução
description The dynamics of medicine has causing great shiver in society, given the progress made in the context of biomedicine and genetic events that provided before thoughtless as the assisted reproduction techniques, therapeutic cloning, surgery for transmutation of sex, as well as focused clinical procedures prolonging life. These events do not occur without causing ethical dilemmas that require a reflection on the limits and degrees of acceptability in the methods and practices used by health professionals, biologists, scientists, pharmacists and others involved in the manipulation of genetic material and trials with humans. From this perspective, this paper, from the analytical assessment of the Bioethics paradigms, promotes the correlation between human dignity, scientific progress and rights of future generations under inflows arising from advances in science and technology in a society of risk and the ambivalence. The analysis of the issues is promoted with the use of dialectical-descriptive methodology, based on the literature about the above issues, involving books, articles, dissertations and theses published in the last ten years. The theoretical framework sits in the design of risks and ambivalences, outlined by Ulrich Beck, Franz Josef Brüseke, Anthony Giddens, Zygmunt Bauman. The study aims to understand the necessary effect bioethics of the precautionary principle as a guiding ethical beacon of scientific and technical progress and the necessary reconciliation between trials and legitimacy of choices for the maintenance and evolution of the human species.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/29
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9695/2015.v1i1.29
url http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/29
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9695/2015.v1i1.29
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistarbda/article/view/29/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais; v. 1 n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 309 - 328
2525-9695
2525-9695
reponame:Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais
collection Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Biodireito e Direito dos Animais - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1830297888844939264

Similar Items