Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2015 |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | por |
| Source: | Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos |
| Download full: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/1014 |
Summary: | The complexity of contemporary society has led to the existence of conflicts in excessive degree of legalization, resulting from a demandista culture coupled with the inefficiency and delays in the provision of state judicial services. This traditional model of conflict resolution is the result of a mistaken reading of the constitutional guarantee of access to justice that took, long, a monopolistic feature, turning the Brazilian Judiciary in a multiport system to receive any kind of demand. However, not every conflict of interest claims the provocation of state jurisdiction, worth observing the democratic dimension of access to justice established by the new Civil Procedure Code, referring to arbitration as an appropriate means of conflict resolution in private. In this context, the new legislation reforming and updates the Law of Arbitration, the expectation is modernizing its institute of court, without state intervention. |
| id |
CONPEDI-11_aa70cae99bc429d4e5ecf1d8f991c85d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/1014 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-11 |
| network_name_str |
Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure CodeA Modernização do Instituto da Arbitragem no Cenário Contemporâneo Sob A Ótica do novo Código de Processo Civil BrasileiroAccess to justiceJurisdictionArbitrationNew civil procedure codeAcesso à justiçaJurisdiçãoArbitragemNovo código de processo civilThe complexity of contemporary society has led to the existence of conflicts in excessive degree of legalization, resulting from a demandista culture coupled with the inefficiency and delays in the provision of state judicial services. This traditional model of conflict resolution is the result of a mistaken reading of the constitutional guarantee of access to justice that took, long, a monopolistic feature, turning the Brazilian Judiciary in a multiport system to receive any kind of demand. However, not every conflict of interest claims the provocation of state jurisdiction, worth observing the democratic dimension of access to justice established by the new Civil Procedure Code, referring to arbitration as an appropriate means of conflict resolution in private. In this context, the new legislation reforming and updates the Law of Arbitration, the expectation is modernizing its institute of court, without state intervention.A complexidade da sociedade contemporânea tem provocado a existência de conflitos em um excessivo grau de judicialização, resultante de uma cultura demandista aliada à ineficiência e morosidade na prestação dos serviços jurisdicionais estatal. Esse modelo tradicional de resolução de conflitos é resultado de uma leitura equivocada da garantia constitucional do acesso à justiça que assumiu, por muito tempo, uma feição monopolística, transformando o Poder Judiciário brasileiro num sistema multiportas para receber toda e qualquer espécie de demanda. Todavia, nem todo conflito de interesses reclama a provocação da jurisdição estatal, valendo observar a dimensão democrática do acesso à justiça estabelecida pelo novo Código de Processo Civil, referenciando a arbitragem como meio adequado de resolução dos conflitos no âmbito privado. Nesse contexto, com a nova legislação que reforma e atualiza a Lei da Arbitragem, a expectativa é de modernização de seu instituto, de forma extrajudicial, sem a intervenção do Estado.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI2015-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/101410.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9679/2015.v1i1.1014Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos; v. 1 n. 1 (2015); 195-2192525-96792525-9679reponame:Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitosinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/1014/pdfCopyright (c) 2016 Feliciano Alcides Diasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDias, Feliciano Alcides2025-03-16T22:53:21Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/1014Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/indexPRIhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/oai||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-96792525-9679opendoar:2025-03-16T22:53:21Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code A Modernização do Instituto da Arbitragem no Cenário Contemporâneo Sob A Ótica do novo Código de Processo Civil Brasileiro |
| title |
Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code |
| spellingShingle |
Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code Dias, Feliciano Alcides Access to justice Jurisdiction Arbitration New civil procedure code Acesso à justiça Jurisdição Arbitragem Novo código de processo civil |
| title_short |
Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code |
| title_full |
Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code |
| title_fullStr |
Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code |
| title_sort |
Arbitration Institute of Modernization in Contemporary Scene From the Perspective of New Brazilian Civil Procedure Code |
| author |
Dias, Feliciano Alcides |
| author_facet |
Dias, Feliciano Alcides |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dias, Feliciano Alcides |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Access to justice Jurisdiction Arbitration New civil procedure code Acesso à justiça Jurisdição Arbitragem Novo código de processo civil |
| topic |
Access to justice Jurisdiction Arbitration New civil procedure code Acesso à justiça Jurisdição Arbitragem Novo código de processo civil |
| description |
The complexity of contemporary society has led to the existence of conflicts in excessive degree of legalization, resulting from a demandista culture coupled with the inefficiency and delays in the provision of state judicial services. This traditional model of conflict resolution is the result of a mistaken reading of the constitutional guarantee of access to justice that took, long, a monopolistic feature, turning the Brazilian Judiciary in a multiport system to receive any kind of demand. However, not every conflict of interest claims the provocation of state jurisdiction, worth observing the democratic dimension of access to justice established by the new Civil Procedure Code, referring to arbitration as an appropriate means of conflict resolution in private. In this context, the new legislation reforming and updates the Law of Arbitration, the expectation is modernizing its institute of court, without state intervention. |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-06 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/1014 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9679/2015.v1i1.1014 |
| url |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/1014 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9679/2015.v1i1.1014 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistasolucoesconflitos/article/view/1014/pdf |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Feliciano Alcides Dias info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Feliciano Alcides Dias |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos; v. 1 n. 1 (2015); 195-219 2525-9679 2525-9679 reponame:Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
| instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
| instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
| institution |
CONPEDI |
| reponame_str |
Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos |
| collection |
Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Formas Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||indexlawjournals@gmail.com |
| _version_ |
1831057305855066112 |