Terminally ill patients’ do not resuscitate orders from the doctors’ perspective

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bonamigo, Elcio Luiz
Publication Date: 2016
Other Authors: Putzel, Elzio Luiz, Hilleshein, Klisman Drescher
Format: Article
Language: por
eng
spa
Source: Revista Bioética (online)
Download full: https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1139
Summary: The do-not-resuscitate order is the explicit statement by patients with advanced disease in progression refusing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This study aimed to describe the attitude of physicians in relation to the this order and the need for its regulation. A questionnaire was applied to 80 physicians in the medicalbureau of the Regional Council of Medicine of Joacaba/SC, Brazil. It was found that 90% of the respondents knew the meaning of do-not-resuscitate, 86.2% agreed to respect it, 91.2% considered it important to be registered in medical records and 92.5% understood as opportune the issuance of a regulation in this regard.It was concluded that most doctors knew about the do-not-resuscitate order, agreed to respect it, valued its registration in medical records and wanted its regulation by the relevant bodies.
id CFM-1_6cc0f5fd65410dce46d0568f3d1983e5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1139
network_acronym_str CFM-1
network_name_str Revista Bioética (online)
repository_id_str
spelling Terminally ill patients’ do not resuscitate orders from the doctors’ perspectiveLa orden de no reanimar a los pacientes en fase terminal bajo la perspectiva de los médicosOrdem de não reanimar pacientes em fase terminal sob a perspectiva de médicosTerminally ill. Bioethics. Resuscitation orders. Heart massage. Respirationartificial. Medical futility.Enfermo terminal. Bioética. Órdenes de resucitación. Masaje cardíaco. Respiración artificial. Inutilidad médica.Doente terminal. Bioética. Ordens de não ressuscitar. Massagem cardíaca. Respiração artificial. Futilidade médica.The do-not-resuscitate order is the explicit statement by patients with advanced disease in progression refusing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This study aimed to describe the attitude of physicians in relation to the this order and the need for its regulation. A questionnaire was applied to 80 physicians in the medicalbureau of the Regional Council of Medicine of Joacaba/SC, Brazil. It was found that 90% of the respondents knew the meaning of do-not-resuscitate, 86.2% agreed to respect it, 91.2% considered it important to be registered in medical records and 92.5% understood as opportune the issuance of a regulation in this regard.It was concluded that most doctors knew about the do-not-resuscitate order, agreed to respect it, valued its registration in medical records and wanted its regulation by the relevant bodies.La orden de no reanimar es la manifestación expresa de rechazo de la reanimación cardiopulmonar por parte de pacientes portadores de una enfermedad avanzada en progresión. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo describir la actitud de los médicos con respecto a esta orden y la necesidad de su regulación. Se aplicó un cuestionario a 80 médicos (50% del total) inscriptos en el distrito del Consejo Regional de Medicina de Joaçaba, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Se encontró que el 90% de los encuestados conocían el significado de esta orden, el 86,2% estaban de acuerdo en cumplirla, el 91,2% consideraban importante el registro en el historial médico y el 92,5% juzgaban oportuna la existencia de una regulación al respecto. Se concluyó que la mayoría de los médicos tenía conocimiento de la orden de no reanimar, estaba de acuerdo en respetarla, valoraba su registro en el historial médico y deseaba su regulación por parte de las instituciones competentes.Ordem de não reanimar consiste na manifestação expressa da recusa de reanimação cardiopulmonar por paciente com doença avançada em progressão. Objetivou-se descrever a atitude dos médicos em relação à ordem de não reanimar e à necessidade de sua normatização. Foi aplicado questionário a 80 médicos inscritos na delegacia do Conselho Regional de Medicina de Joaçaba/SC, Brasil. Verificou-se que 90% dos participantes conheciam o significado dessa ordem, 86,2% concordavam em acatá-la, 91,2% consideravam importante seu registro em prontuário e 92,5% consideravam oportuna a emissão de normatização a respeito. Concluiu-se que a maioria dos médicos tinha conhecimento sobre Ordem de Não Reanimar, concordava em respeitá-la, valorizava seu registro em prontuário e desejava a normatização por parte dos órgãos competentes.CFM2016-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por ParesPesquisa quantitativaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1139Revista Bioética; Vol. 24 No. 3 (2016): Rev. bioét. (Impr.). 2016; 24 (3)Revista Bioética; Vol. 24 Núm. 3 (2016): Rev. bioét. (Impr.). 2016; 24 (3)Revista Bioética; v. 24 n. 3 (2016): Rev. bioét. (Impr.). 2016; 24 (3)1983-80341983-8042reponame:Revista Bioética (online)instname:Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM)instacron:CFMporengspahttps://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1139/1570https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1139/1571https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1139/1572Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Bioéticainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBonamigo, Elcio LuizPutzel, Elzio LuizHilleshein, Klisman Drescher2016-11-25T12:46:30Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/1139Revistahttps://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioeticaPUBhttps://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/oaibioetica@portalmedico.org.br||revistabioetica@gmail.com1983-80421983-8034opendoar:2016-11-25T12:46:30Revista Bioética (online) - Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Terminally ill patients’ do not resuscitate orders from the doctors’ perspective
La orden de no reanimar a los pacientes en fase terminal bajo la perspectiva de los médicos
Ordem de não reanimar pacientes em fase terminal sob a perspectiva de médicos
title Terminally ill patients’ do not resuscitate orders from the doctors’ perspective
spellingShingle Terminally ill patients’ do not resuscitate orders from the doctors’ perspective
Bonamigo, Elcio Luiz
Terminally ill. Bioethics. Resuscitation orders. Heart massage. Respiration
artificial. Medical futility.
Enfermo terminal. Bioética. Órdenes de resucitación. Masaje cardíaco. Respiración artificial. Inutilidad médica.
Doente terminal. Bioética. Ordens de não ressuscitar. Massagem cardíaca. Respiração artificial. Futilidade médica.
title_short Terminally ill patients’ do not resuscitate orders from the doctors’ perspective
title_full Terminally ill patients’ do not resuscitate orders from the doctors’ perspective
title_fullStr Terminally ill patients’ do not resuscitate orders from the doctors’ perspective
title_full_unstemmed Terminally ill patients’ do not resuscitate orders from the doctors’ perspective
title_sort Terminally ill patients’ do not resuscitate orders from the doctors’ perspective
author Bonamigo, Elcio Luiz
author_facet Bonamigo, Elcio Luiz
Putzel, Elzio Luiz
Hilleshein, Klisman Drescher
author_role author
author2 Putzel, Elzio Luiz
Hilleshein, Klisman Drescher
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bonamigo, Elcio Luiz
Putzel, Elzio Luiz
Hilleshein, Klisman Drescher
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Terminally ill. Bioethics. Resuscitation orders. Heart massage. Respiration
artificial. Medical futility.
Enfermo terminal. Bioética. Órdenes de resucitación. Masaje cardíaco. Respiración artificial. Inutilidad médica.
Doente terminal. Bioética. Ordens de não ressuscitar. Massagem cardíaca. Respiração artificial. Futilidade médica.
topic Terminally ill. Bioethics. Resuscitation orders. Heart massage. Respiration
artificial. Medical futility.
Enfermo terminal. Bioética. Órdenes de resucitación. Masaje cardíaco. Respiración artificial. Inutilidad médica.
Doente terminal. Bioética. Ordens de não ressuscitar. Massagem cardíaca. Respiração artificial. Futilidade médica.
description The do-not-resuscitate order is the explicit statement by patients with advanced disease in progression refusing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This study aimed to describe the attitude of physicians in relation to the this order and the need for its regulation. A questionnaire was applied to 80 physicians in the medicalbureau of the Regional Council of Medicine of Joacaba/SC, Brazil. It was found that 90% of the respondents knew the meaning of do-not-resuscitate, 86.2% agreed to respect it, 91.2% considered it important to be registered in medical records and 92.5% understood as opportune the issuance of a regulation in this regard.It was concluded that most doctors knew about the do-not-resuscitate order, agreed to respect it, valued its registration in medical records and wanted its regulation by the relevant bodies.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-11-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
Pesquisa quantitativa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1139
url https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1139
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
spa
language por
eng
spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1139/1570
https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1139/1571
https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1139/1572
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Bioética
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Bioética
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv CFM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv CFM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Bioética; Vol. 24 No. 3 (2016): Rev. bioét. (Impr.). 2016; 24 (3)
Revista Bioética; Vol. 24 Núm. 3 (2016): Rev. bioét. (Impr.). 2016; 24 (3)
Revista Bioética; v. 24 n. 3 (2016): Rev. bioét. (Impr.). 2016; 24 (3)
1983-8034
1983-8042
reponame:Revista Bioética (online)
instname:Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM)
instacron:CFM
instname_str Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM)
instacron_str CFM
institution CFM
reponame_str Revista Bioética (online)
collection Revista Bioética (online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Bioética (online) - Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bioetica@portalmedico.org.br||revistabioetica@gmail.com
_version_ 1830213565057859584

Similar Items