Public and private supply of beds and access to health care in the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Saude em Debate |
Texto Completo: | https://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/4470 |
Resumo: | The COVID-19 pandemic, a global health crisis, has put health systems in several countries in check. In Brazil, patient care has brought about disparities in the offer and access to public and private services and initiatives to preserve healthcare segmentation. The work systematizes information about: beds for hospitalization by COVID-19; patients´ complaints claiming access; and initiatives to expand the offer of assistance resources involving government proposals and the private sector (health plans and hospitals). There was an expansion of hospital beds, but the uneven distribution in the regions of the country has not changed. Nor does it appear to have changed the pattern of rationed coverage on the part of health insurance companies. A considerable part of the analyzed lawsuits refers to the denial of access to clients of private plans due to contractual deficiency, while SUS patients requested place in the ICU. Lives were lost due to the absence of an effective protection regulation for both SUS patients and restrictive plans. Public intensive care units had maximum occupancy, while the private sector registered idle beds. The analysis shows barriers to access beds and resistance to attempts to unify public and private efforts to mitigate lethality by the new coronavirus. |
id |
CBES-1_ee1a2bc4d096d0e2024e8b16bbffd950 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.saudeemdebate.emnuvens.com.br:article/4470 |
network_acronym_str |
CBES-1 |
network_name_str |
Saude em Debate |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Public and private supply of beds and access to health care in the Covid-19 pandemic in BrazilOferta pública e privada de leitos e acesso aos cuidados à saúde na pandemia de Covid-19 no BrasilCOVID-19. Acesso aos serviços de saúde. Sistema Único de Saúde. Planos de pré-pagamento em saúde. Direito à saúde.COVID-19. Health services accessibility. Unified Health System. Prepaid health plans. Right to health.The COVID-19 pandemic, a global health crisis, has put health systems in several countries in check. In Brazil, patient care has brought about disparities in the offer and access to public and private services and initiatives to preserve healthcare segmentation. The work systematizes information about: beds for hospitalization by COVID-19; patients´ complaints claiming access; and initiatives to expand the offer of assistance resources involving government proposals and the private sector (health plans and hospitals). There was an expansion of hospital beds, but the uneven distribution in the regions of the country has not changed. Nor does it appear to have changed the pattern of rationed coverage on the part of health insurance companies. A considerable part of the analyzed lawsuits refers to the denial of access to clients of private plans due to contractual deficiency, while SUS patients requested place in the ICU. Lives were lost due to the absence of an effective protection regulation for both SUS patients and restrictive plans. Public intensive care units had maximum occupancy, while the private sector registered idle beds. The analysis shows barriers to access beds and resistance to attempts to unify public and private efforts to mitigate lethality by the new coronavirus.A pandemia de COVID-19, uma crise sanitária global, pôs em xeque sistemas de saúde de diversos países. No Brasil, o atendimento aos pacientes trouxe à tona disparidades na oferta e acesso a serviços públicos e privados e iniciativas para preservar a segmentação assistencial. O trabalho sistematiza informações sobre: leitos para internação por COVID-19; pleitos de pacientes reivindicando acesso; e iniciativas para ampliar a oferta de recursos assistenciais envolvendo proposições governamentais e setor privado (empresas de planos e hospitais). Houve expansão de leitos hospitalares, mas a distribuição desigual nas regiões do país não foi alterada. Tampouco, parece ter havido mudanças no padrão de cobertura racionada de parte das empresas de planos de saúde. Parte considerável das ações judiciais analisadas refere-se à negação de acesso de clientes de planos privados por carência contratual, enquanto pacientes do SUS pleitearam vaga em UTI. Vidas foram perdidas por ausência de uma regulação de proteção efetiva tanto aos pacientes do SUS quanto de planos restritivos. Unidades públicas de terapia intensiva tiveram ocupação máxima, enquanto o setor privado registrou leitos ociosos. A análise evidencia barreiras de acesso a leitos e resistência às tentativas de unificação de esforços públicos e privados para mitigar a letalidade pelo novo coronavírus. Maria Lucia Frizon Rizzotto2022-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/4470Saúde em Debate; Vol. 44 No. especial 4 dez (2020): Covid-19: knowing to face future challenges; 232-247Saúde em Debate; Vol. 44 Núm. especial 4 dez (2020): Covid-19: conhecer para enfrentar os desafios futuros; 232-247Saúde em Debate; v. 44 n. especial 4 dez (2020): Covid-19: conhecer para enfrentar os desafios futuros; 232-2472358-28980103-1104reponame:Saude em Debateinstname:Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saudeinstacron:CBESporhttps://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/4470/643Copyright (c) 2022 Saúde em Debatehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Danielle Conte Alves Riani Bahia, LigiaCarvalho, Elza Maria Cristina Laurentino de Cardoso , Artur MonteSouza, Paulo Marcos Senra2023-09-01T17:17:43Zoai:ojs.saudeemdebate.emnuvens.com.br:article/4470Revistahttps://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/ONGhttps://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/oairevista@saudeemdebate.org.br2358-28980103-1104opendoar:2025-02-17T13:19:48.632440Saude em Debate - Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saudefalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Public and private supply of beds and access to health care in the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil Oferta pública e privada de leitos e acesso aos cuidados à saúde na pandemia de Covid-19 no Brasil |
title |
Public and private supply of beds and access to health care in the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Public and private supply of beds and access to health care in the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil Costa, Danielle Conte Alves Riani COVID-19. Acesso aos serviços de saúde. Sistema Único de Saúde. Planos de pré-pagamento em saúde. Direito à saúde. COVID-19. Health services accessibility. Unified Health System. Prepaid health plans. Right to health. |
title_short |
Public and private supply of beds and access to health care in the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil |
title_full |
Public and private supply of beds and access to health care in the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Public and private supply of beds and access to health care in the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Public and private supply of beds and access to health care in the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil |
title_sort |
Public and private supply of beds and access to health care in the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil |
author |
Costa, Danielle Conte Alves Riani |
author_facet |
Costa, Danielle Conte Alves Riani Bahia, Ligia Carvalho, Elza Maria Cristina Laurentino de Cardoso , Artur Monte Souza, Paulo Marcos Senra |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bahia, Ligia Carvalho, Elza Maria Cristina Laurentino de Cardoso , Artur Monte Souza, Paulo Marcos Senra |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Danielle Conte Alves Riani Bahia, Ligia Carvalho, Elza Maria Cristina Laurentino de Cardoso , Artur Monte Souza, Paulo Marcos Senra |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
COVID-19. Acesso aos serviços de saúde. Sistema Único de Saúde. Planos de pré-pagamento em saúde. Direito à saúde. COVID-19. Health services accessibility. Unified Health System. Prepaid health plans. Right to health. |
topic |
COVID-19. Acesso aos serviços de saúde. Sistema Único de Saúde. Planos de pré-pagamento em saúde. Direito à saúde. COVID-19. Health services accessibility. Unified Health System. Prepaid health plans. Right to health. |
description |
The COVID-19 pandemic, a global health crisis, has put health systems in several countries in check. In Brazil, patient care has brought about disparities in the offer and access to public and private services and initiatives to preserve healthcare segmentation. The work systematizes information about: beds for hospitalization by COVID-19; patients´ complaints claiming access; and initiatives to expand the offer of assistance resources involving government proposals and the private sector (health plans and hospitals). There was an expansion of hospital beds, but the uneven distribution in the regions of the country has not changed. Nor does it appear to have changed the pattern of rationed coverage on the part of health insurance companies. A considerable part of the analyzed lawsuits refers to the denial of access to clients of private plans due to contractual deficiency, while SUS patients requested place in the ICU. Lives were lost due to the absence of an effective protection regulation for both SUS patients and restrictive plans. Public intensive care units had maximum occupancy, while the private sector registered idle beds. The analysis shows barriers to access beds and resistance to attempts to unify public and private efforts to mitigate lethality by the new coronavirus. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/4470 |
url |
https://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/4470 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/4470/643 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Saúde em Debate http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Saúde em Debate http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Maria Lucia Frizon Rizzotto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Maria Lucia Frizon Rizzotto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Saúde em Debate; Vol. 44 No. especial 4 dez (2020): Covid-19: knowing to face future challenges; 232-247 Saúde em Debate; Vol. 44 Núm. especial 4 dez (2020): Covid-19: conhecer para enfrentar os desafios futuros; 232-247 Saúde em Debate; v. 44 n. especial 4 dez (2020): Covid-19: conhecer para enfrentar os desafios futuros; 232-247 2358-2898 0103-1104 reponame:Saude em Debate instname:Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saude instacron:CBES |
instname_str |
Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saude |
instacron_str |
CBES |
institution |
CBES |
reponame_str |
Saude em Debate |
collection |
Saude em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Saude em Debate - Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saude |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@saudeemdebate.org.br |
_version_ |
1824322521314361344 |