What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about new practices on integrative medicine?
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2018 |
| Other Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | eng |
| Source: | São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
| Download full: | https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1338 |
Summary: | BACKGROUND: This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) on the effects of ten integrative practices that were recently added to the Brazilian public healthcare system (SUS). DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp). METHODS: Review of Cochrane SRs on the following interventions were identified, summarized and critically assessed: apitherapy, aromatherapy, bioenergetics, family constellation, flower therapy, chromotherapy, geotherapy, hypnotherapy, hand imposition or ozone therapy. RESULTS: We included a total of 16 SRs: 4 on apitherapy, 4 on aromatherapy, 6 on hypnotherapy and 2 on ozone therapy. No Cochrane SR was found regarding bioenergetics, family constellation, chromotherapy, clay therapy, flower therapy or hand imposition. The only high-quality evidence was in relation to the potential benefit of apitherapy, specifically regarding some benefits from honey dressings for partial healing of burn wounds, for reduction of coughing among children with acute coughs and for preventing allergic reactions to insect stings. CONCLUSION: Except for some specific uses of apitherapy (honey for burn wounds and for acute coughs and bee venom for allergic reactions to insect stings), the use of ten integrative practices that have recently been incorporated into SUS does not seem to be supported by evidence from Cochrane SRs. |
| id |
APM-1_dc941e71ba7780cbf3abc98ad3a46cc3 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.diagnosticoetratamento.emnuvens.com.br:article/1338 |
| network_acronym_str |
APM-1 |
| network_name_str |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about new practices on integrative medicine?Review [publication type]Public health administrationEvidence-based medicineIntegrative medicineHealth policyBACKGROUND: This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) on the effects of ten integrative practices that were recently added to the Brazilian public healthcare system (SUS). DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp). METHODS: Review of Cochrane SRs on the following interventions were identified, summarized and critically assessed: apitherapy, aromatherapy, bioenergetics, family constellation, flower therapy, chromotherapy, geotherapy, hypnotherapy, hand imposition or ozone therapy. RESULTS: We included a total of 16 SRs: 4 on apitherapy, 4 on aromatherapy, 6 on hypnotherapy and 2 on ozone therapy. No Cochrane SR was found regarding bioenergetics, family constellation, chromotherapy, clay therapy, flower therapy or hand imposition. The only high-quality evidence was in relation to the potential benefit of apitherapy, specifically regarding some benefits from honey dressings for partial healing of burn wounds, for reduction of coughing among children with acute coughs and for preventing allergic reactions to insect stings. CONCLUSION: Except for some specific uses of apitherapy (honey for burn wounds and for acute coughs and bee venom for allergic reactions to insect stings), the use of ten integrative practices that have recently been incorporated into SUS does not seem to be supported by evidence from Cochrane SRs.São Paulo Medical JournalSão Paulo Medical Journal2018-06-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1338São Paulo Medical Journal; Vol. 136 No. 3 (2018); 251-261São Paulo Medical Journal; v. 136 n. 3 (2018); 251-2611806-9460reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APMenghttps://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1338/1255https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRiera, RachelBraga, Vinícius LopesRocha, Luana Pompeu dos SantosBernardo, Daniel DamascenoAndrade, Luísa Avelar Fernandes deHsu, Jessica ChiuSilva, Luciana Di Giovanni Marques daSuetsugu, Rodrigo Cesar de SáDittrich, Nicole HosniLima, Lucas Riguete Pereira deSilveira, Vicente Penido daKruglensky, Barbara CaonLeonel, Letícia de FreitasBarros, Edivando de MouraCosta, Anderson Adriano Leal Freitas daQuintella, Miguel LinsPacheco, Rafael LeiteCruz, Carolina de OliveiraMartimbianco, Ana Luiza CabreraPachito, Daniela ViannaMozetic, VaniaTeixeira, Tatiana de Bruyn FerrazTorloni, Maria ReginaAtallah, Alvaro Nagib2023-08-31T21:40:17Zoai:ojs.diagnosticoetratamento.emnuvens.com.br:article/1338Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2023-08-31T21:40:17São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about new practices on integrative medicine? |
| title |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about new practices on integrative medicine? |
| spellingShingle |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about new practices on integrative medicine? Riera, Rachel Review [publication type] Public health administration Evidence-based medicine Integrative medicine Health policy |
| title_short |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about new practices on integrative medicine? |
| title_full |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about new practices on integrative medicine? |
| title_fullStr |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about new practices on integrative medicine? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about new practices on integrative medicine? |
| title_sort |
What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about new practices on integrative medicine? |
| author |
Riera, Rachel |
| author_facet |
Riera, Rachel Braga, Vinícius Lopes Rocha, Luana Pompeu dos Santos Bernardo, Daniel Damasceno Andrade, Luísa Avelar Fernandes de Hsu, Jessica Chiu Silva, Luciana Di Giovanni Marques da Suetsugu, Rodrigo Cesar de Sá Dittrich, Nicole Hosni Lima, Lucas Riguete Pereira de Silveira, Vicente Penido da Kruglensky, Barbara Caon Leonel, Letícia de Freitas Barros, Edivando de Moura Costa, Anderson Adriano Leal Freitas da Quintella, Miguel Lins Pacheco, Rafael Leite Cruz, Carolina de Oliveira Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera Pachito, Daniela Vianna Mozetic, Vania Teixeira, Tatiana de Bruyn Ferraz Torloni, Maria Regina Atallah, Alvaro Nagib |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Braga, Vinícius Lopes Rocha, Luana Pompeu dos Santos Bernardo, Daniel Damasceno Andrade, Luísa Avelar Fernandes de Hsu, Jessica Chiu Silva, Luciana Di Giovanni Marques da Suetsugu, Rodrigo Cesar de Sá Dittrich, Nicole Hosni Lima, Lucas Riguete Pereira de Silveira, Vicente Penido da Kruglensky, Barbara Caon Leonel, Letícia de Freitas Barros, Edivando de Moura Costa, Anderson Adriano Leal Freitas da Quintella, Miguel Lins Pacheco, Rafael Leite Cruz, Carolina de Oliveira Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera Pachito, Daniela Vianna Mozetic, Vania Teixeira, Tatiana de Bruyn Ferraz Torloni, Maria Regina Atallah, Alvaro Nagib |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Riera, Rachel Braga, Vinícius Lopes Rocha, Luana Pompeu dos Santos Bernardo, Daniel Damasceno Andrade, Luísa Avelar Fernandes de Hsu, Jessica Chiu Silva, Luciana Di Giovanni Marques da Suetsugu, Rodrigo Cesar de Sá Dittrich, Nicole Hosni Lima, Lucas Riguete Pereira de Silveira, Vicente Penido da Kruglensky, Barbara Caon Leonel, Letícia de Freitas Barros, Edivando de Moura Costa, Anderson Adriano Leal Freitas da Quintella, Miguel Lins Pacheco, Rafael Leite Cruz, Carolina de Oliveira Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera Pachito, Daniela Vianna Mozetic, Vania Teixeira, Tatiana de Bruyn Ferraz Torloni, Maria Regina Atallah, Alvaro Nagib |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Review [publication type] Public health administration Evidence-based medicine Integrative medicine Health policy |
| topic |
Review [publication type] Public health administration Evidence-based medicine Integrative medicine Health policy |
| description |
BACKGROUND: This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) on the effects of ten integrative practices that were recently added to the Brazilian public healthcare system (SUS). DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp). METHODS: Review of Cochrane SRs on the following interventions were identified, summarized and critically assessed: apitherapy, aromatherapy, bioenergetics, family constellation, flower therapy, chromotherapy, geotherapy, hypnotherapy, hand imposition or ozone therapy. RESULTS: We included a total of 16 SRs: 4 on apitherapy, 4 on aromatherapy, 6 on hypnotherapy and 2 on ozone therapy. No Cochrane SR was found regarding bioenergetics, family constellation, chromotherapy, clay therapy, flower therapy or hand imposition. The only high-quality evidence was in relation to the potential benefit of apitherapy, specifically regarding some benefits from honey dressings for partial healing of burn wounds, for reduction of coughing among children with acute coughs and for preventing allergic reactions to insect stings. CONCLUSION: Except for some specific uses of apitherapy (honey for burn wounds and for acute coughs and bee venom for allergic reactions to insect stings), the use of ten integrative practices that have recently been incorporated into SUS does not seem to be supported by evidence from Cochrane SRs. |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-06-07 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1338 |
| url |
https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1338 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/1338/1255 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo Medical Journal São Paulo Medical Journal |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo Medical Journal São Paulo Medical Journal |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo Medical Journal; Vol. 136 No. 3 (2018); 251-261 São Paulo Medical Journal; v. 136 n. 3 (2018); 251-261 1806-9460 reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online) instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina instacron:APM |
| instname_str |
Associação Paulista de Medicina |
| instacron_str |
APM |
| institution |
APM |
| reponame_str |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
| collection |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistas@apm.org.br |
| _version_ |
1825135063666262016 |