Could polyhexanide and chlorine dioxide be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine? A systematic review

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Santos, Paulo Sérgio da Silva
Publication Date: 2022
Other Authors: Santos, Dayanne Simões Ferreira, Maman, Mariela Peralta, Brandão, Felipe Suaki, Andrade, Flaviana Bombarda, Cruvinel, Thiago
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: São Paulo medical journal (Online)
Download full: https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/555
Summary: BACKGROUND: Maintenance of oral microbiota balance is the simplest way to prevent infectious oral diseases, through controlling dental biofilm. Combined use of mouthwash and mechanical removal has been shown to be a very effective way for this. OBJECTIVES: To identify clinical studies comparing the antimicrobial effect and possible adverse effects and/or side effects of chlorhexidine-based mouthwashes with those of mouthwashes containing chlorine dioxide and/or polyhexanide, for controlling oral microbiota. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review designed by the stomatology sector of postgraduation in applied dental sciences of Bauru Dentistry School, University of São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using online databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Science Direct) up to April 8, 2020. The search was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: The studies included comprised eight articles published between 2001 and 2017. A total of 295 young adults, adults and elderly people were evaluated (males 44.75% and females 55.25%). Three articles compared polyhexanide with chlorhexidine and five articles compared chlorine dioxide with chlorhexidine. No studies comparing all three mouthwashes were found. The concentrations of the study solutions were quite varied, and all rinses had an antimicrobial effect. In four studies, it was stated that no side effects or adverse effects had been found. Three studies did not address these results and only one study addressed side effects and/or adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Mouthwashes containing chlorine dioxide and polyhexanide are viable alternatives to chlorhexidine, since they reduce oral biofilm and have little or no reported side or adverse effects. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO - CRD42019115929 – Available from: https://www.crd. york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019115929.
id APM-1_cfcf12c4048636a3f3045110b040777d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.diagnosticoetratamento.emnuvens.com.br:article/555
network_acronym_str APM-1
network_name_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Could polyhexanide and chlorine dioxide be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine? A systematic reviewChlorhexidinePolyhexanide [supplementary concept]Chlorine dioxide [supplementary concept]MouthwashSystematic review [publication type]BACKGROUND: Maintenance of oral microbiota balance is the simplest way to prevent infectious oral diseases, through controlling dental biofilm. Combined use of mouthwash and mechanical removal has been shown to be a very effective way for this. OBJECTIVES: To identify clinical studies comparing the antimicrobial effect and possible adverse effects and/or side effects of chlorhexidine-based mouthwashes with those of mouthwashes containing chlorine dioxide and/or polyhexanide, for controlling oral microbiota. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review designed by the stomatology sector of postgraduation in applied dental sciences of Bauru Dentistry School, University of São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using online databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Science Direct) up to April 8, 2020. The search was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: The studies included comprised eight articles published between 2001 and 2017. A total of 295 young adults, adults and elderly people were evaluated (males 44.75% and females 55.25%). Three articles compared polyhexanide with chlorhexidine and five articles compared chlorine dioxide with chlorhexidine. No studies comparing all three mouthwashes were found. The concentrations of the study solutions were quite varied, and all rinses had an antimicrobial effect. In four studies, it was stated that no side effects or adverse effects had been found. Three studies did not address these results and only one study addressed side effects and/or adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Mouthwashes containing chlorine dioxide and polyhexanide are viable alternatives to chlorhexidine, since they reduce oral biofilm and have little or no reported side or adverse effects. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO - CRD42019115929 – Available from: https://www.crd. york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019115929.São Paulo Medical JournalSão Paulo Medical Journal2022-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/555São Paulo Medical Journal; Vol. 140 No. 1 (2022); 1-14São Paulo Medical Journal; v. 140 n. 1 (2022); 1-141806-9460reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)instname:Associação Paulista de Medicinainstacron:APMenghttps://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/555/500https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Paulo Sérgio da SilvaSantos, Dayanne Simões FerreiraMaman, Mariela PeraltaBrandão, Felipe SuakiAndrade, Flaviana BombardaCruvinel, Thiago2023-08-22T11:17:22Zoai:ojs.diagnosticoetratamento.emnuvens.com.br:article/555Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/spmjPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistas@apm.org.br1806-94601516-3180opendoar:2023-08-22T11:17:22São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicinafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Could polyhexanide and chlorine dioxide be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine? A systematic review
title Could polyhexanide and chlorine dioxide be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine? A systematic review
spellingShingle Could polyhexanide and chlorine dioxide be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine? A systematic review
Santos, Paulo Sérgio da Silva
Chlorhexidine
Polyhexanide [supplementary concept]
Chlorine dioxide [supplementary concept]
Mouthwash
Systematic review [publication type]
title_short Could polyhexanide and chlorine dioxide be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine? A systematic review
title_full Could polyhexanide and chlorine dioxide be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine? A systematic review
title_fullStr Could polyhexanide and chlorine dioxide be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Could polyhexanide and chlorine dioxide be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine? A systematic review
title_sort Could polyhexanide and chlorine dioxide be used as an alternative to chlorhexidine? A systematic review
author Santos, Paulo Sérgio da Silva
author_facet Santos, Paulo Sérgio da Silva
Santos, Dayanne Simões Ferreira
Maman, Mariela Peralta
Brandão, Felipe Suaki
Andrade, Flaviana Bombarda
Cruvinel, Thiago
author_role author
author2 Santos, Dayanne Simões Ferreira
Maman, Mariela Peralta
Brandão, Felipe Suaki
Andrade, Flaviana Bombarda
Cruvinel, Thiago
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Paulo Sérgio da Silva
Santos, Dayanne Simões Ferreira
Maman, Mariela Peralta
Brandão, Felipe Suaki
Andrade, Flaviana Bombarda
Cruvinel, Thiago
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chlorhexidine
Polyhexanide [supplementary concept]
Chlorine dioxide [supplementary concept]
Mouthwash
Systematic review [publication type]
topic Chlorhexidine
Polyhexanide [supplementary concept]
Chlorine dioxide [supplementary concept]
Mouthwash
Systematic review [publication type]
description BACKGROUND: Maintenance of oral microbiota balance is the simplest way to prevent infectious oral diseases, through controlling dental biofilm. Combined use of mouthwash and mechanical removal has been shown to be a very effective way for this. OBJECTIVES: To identify clinical studies comparing the antimicrobial effect and possible adverse effects and/or side effects of chlorhexidine-based mouthwashes with those of mouthwashes containing chlorine dioxide and/or polyhexanide, for controlling oral microbiota. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review designed by the stomatology sector of postgraduation in applied dental sciences of Bauru Dentistry School, University of São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using online databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Science Direct) up to April 8, 2020. The search was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: The studies included comprised eight articles published between 2001 and 2017. A total of 295 young adults, adults and elderly people were evaluated (males 44.75% and females 55.25%). Three articles compared polyhexanide with chlorhexidine and five articles compared chlorine dioxide with chlorhexidine. No studies comparing all three mouthwashes were found. The concentrations of the study solutions were quite varied, and all rinses had an antimicrobial effect. In four studies, it was stated that no side effects or adverse effects had been found. Three studies did not address these results and only one study addressed side effects and/or adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Mouthwashes containing chlorine dioxide and polyhexanide are viable alternatives to chlorhexidine, since they reduce oral biofilm and have little or no reported side or adverse effects. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO - CRD42019115929 – Available from: https://www.crd. york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019115929.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/555
url https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/555
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicosapm.emnuvens.com.br/spmj/article/view/555/500
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv São Paulo Medical Journal
São Paulo Medical Journal
publisher.none.fl_str_mv São Paulo Medical Journal
São Paulo Medical Journal
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv São Paulo Medical Journal; Vol. 140 No. 1 (2022); 1-14
São Paulo Medical Journal; v. 140 n. 1 (2022); 1-14
1806-9460
reponame:São Paulo medical journal (Online)
instname:Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron:APM
instname_str Associação Paulista de Medicina
instacron_str APM
institution APM
reponame_str São Paulo medical journal (Online)
collection São Paulo medical journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv São Paulo medical journal (Online) - Associação Paulista de Medicina
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistas@apm.org.br
_version_ 1825135057174528000