Brazilian consumers’ perception towards food labeling models accompanying self-service foods

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Felipetto, Nariéli
Publication Date: 2022
Other Authors: Scheffer, Patrícia Arruda, Margutti, Karen Mello de Mattos, Silveira, Joice Trindade, Marques, Clandio Timm, Storck, Cátia Regina, Oliveira, Viviani Ruffo de, Helbig, Elizabete, Ginani, Verônica Cortez, Saccol, Ana Lúcia de Freitas
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UnB
Download full: http://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/46549
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11060838
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2377-2930
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5341-1263
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6491-6988
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6029-2525
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8751-3671
Summary: The study aimed to evaluate consumers’ perception of self-service foods’ nutrition labels. This qualitative and quantitative assessment was performed with potential consumers at food services. Four food labeling formats, traditional, simplified, traffic-light, and warning, were proposed to evaluate three types of sandwiches: simple, chicken, and hamburger. Data were collected via an online survey from April to May 2020. The study included 413 subjects. The respondents preferred the traffic-light format, but there was a good understanding and acceptability of all four models. The traffic-light and warning nutrition labeling models, which showed health warnings, led to a reduction in the choice of the Simple Sandwich and the Hamburger. Most respondents (96.1%, n = 397) agreed that it is necessary to complement the information on food labels with ingredients and the number of calories per serving. Therefore, it is essential to have legislation regulating such issues. Consumers’ choices improved with the increase in the information placed on the products. This research demonstrated that nutrition labels explain what exists currently and that consumers require such information. Thus, food labeling may positively influence consumers’ choices.