A tensão entre a regulação das plataformas digitais e a liberdade de expressão no Brasil: uma análise discursivo-argumentativa envolvendo enunciados econômicos, jornalísticos e jurídicos
Uloženo v:
| Hlavní autor: | |
|---|---|
| Datum vydání: | 2025 |
| Médium: | Master thesis |
| Jazyk: | por |
| Zdroj: | Repositório Institucional da UFG |
| Download full: | https://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/14518 |
Shrnutí: | In this research, it was proposed to analyze the arguments and discourses that involve the regulation of digital platforms in Brazil, considering the conflicting relationship with the principle of freedom of expression. From the argumentative analysis of Ruth Amossy's discourse (AAD), the types of argument of Ingedore Koch and the characterizations on the controversy proposed by Marcelo Dascal, it was evaluated as the public debate has been around the issue. It was more specifically to investigate how the journalistic, legal and economic discourses operate in the context of the proposal and subsequent archive of Bill 2630/2020 in the House of Representatives, known as Fake News PEC. Corpus is made up of journalistic articles, official statements by the digital communication platforms and decisions of the Federal Supreme Court ministers who have expressed themselves on the attempted regulation and the operation of these platforms in the country. |